首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisat
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisat
admin
2017-03-15
36
问题
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisations proceed, he said, from bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to apathy; from apathy to dependency; and from dependency back to bondage. Apathy is also anti-democratic: democracy requires the informed consent of the governed, and will not last if voters can’t be bothered.
Europe’s leaders also fret that apathy is anti-European. Popular indifference, they fear, leaves the European Union’s institutions vulnerable to the gusts of popular indignation. Their worry is understandable. The polling evidence, for what it is worth, shows that people who say they know a lot about the EU tend to support it. Those who know nothing and care less tend to be Eurosceptics. So governments and public institutions naturally seek to combat Euro-apathy as much as they can: by public-relations campaigns, by exhortations that Europe must dream (Jacques Delors’s admonition against indifference)—or by stunts such as last weekend’s birthday bash in Berlin to mark the 50th anniversary of the EU’s founding Treaty of Rome.
If apathy were indeed a threat to European integration, there would seem to be much reason to worry. Apathy is lolling about everywhere. Voter turnout has fallen in every election to the European Parliament since the institution was created. In the most recent one, in 2004, it slumped below 50%—a lower rate than India’s parliamentary polls. The gap between turnout in national elections and in European ones is widening, so the problem seems especially acute for the EU.
Britain’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, has a website where people can file online petitions. It is an unscientific measure of popular concerns, but intriguing nonetheless. A recent petition asking Britain to hold a referendum on any EU constitution got a few thousand electronic signatures. One opposing road pricing got a few million.
It is hard to measure degrees of apathy non-anecdotally because people tend to react badly to polling questions such as "Do you care two hoots about the EU?" But lack of knowledge might be taken as a proxy for lack of concern. Here too the evidence is discouraging. Some three-quarters of Europeans, asked to rate their own knowledge of the EU, say it is modest or non-existent, and this share is rising, not falling.
Yet is it really true that apathy is an obstacle to European integration? A certain amount of apathy is understandable, perhaps inevitable. The EU’s institutions are remote and deliberately complex (deliberately in the sense that they seek to balance pan-European decision-making with national checks and balances). Most voters have no idea who represents them in the European Parliament and would not recognise a European commissioner if one turned up on their doorstep.
There are also reasons why apathy might have grown. Historically, the term entered common use after the First World War, when it was associated with shell-shock and depression. The EU is suffering from the bombshell when French and Dutch voters rejected the draft constitution in 2005. It can also be argued that economic sluggishness and high unemployment (at least until the current recovery) have led to a continent-wide depression.
More important, apathy has its compensations, especially for Europhiles. Without it, European integration would not have gone as far as it has. There was almost no debate about the content of the constitution in the referendum campaigns in Spain or Luxembourg, which approved it by wide margins. The voters who looked most closely at the text were in France and the Netherlands. Similarly, Britain debated the merits of the single currency more extensively than any other country. But Britain stayed out, while others adopted it without discussion.
European integration can proceed without popular enthusiasm because of its character: the EU has a large regulatory component and much integration proceeds through rules-based co-operation. Rules and technical standards are peculiarly unsuited to mobilising popular opinion, whether for or against.
Most people are content to leave them to experts. Integration by regulation proceeds under the voters’ indifferent gaze. In that sense, apathy is the Europhiles’ best friend.
Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, has learned this lesson. The "Berlin declaration" to mark the 50th birthday was written in secret and signed only by the EU’s own representatives: Ms. Merkel as holder of the EU presidency and the heads of the European Commission and Parliament. It seems likely that any revised constitutional treaty- will also be cooked up in semi-secret, with the aim of ratification by national parliaments, not referendums. Let sleeping voters lie.
But there is a further manifestation of apathy to consider: a behavioural condition associated with it, known as "learned helplessness". In 1965 a psychologist, Martin Seligman, subjected two groups of dogs to electric shocks. The first group could end the punishment by pressing a lever. These dogs recovered quickly; in a subsequent experiment, they learned to avoid further shocks by jumping a low wall. The second group had a lever that did nothing. They became apathetic and in the subsequent experiment simply cowered on the electrified floor, unable to escape the shocks. They had "learned helplessness".
In Europe, the treaties of Maastricht and Nice were rejected by Danish and Irish voters, only to be largely implemented later. If the constitution is successfully revived—a big if—it would continue this pattern. Some EU leaders may hope that, if they do this often enough, apathetic voters will learn that they are helpless to stop further integration, even when they want to.
Why do European leaders fret that apathy is anti-European?
选项
答案
Indifference leaves the European Union’s institutions vulnerable to the gusts of popular indignation. People who say they know a lot about the EU tend to support it. Those who know nothing and care less tend to be Eurosceptics who seek to combat Euro-apathy as much as they can.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/PhCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Manyschool-busdriversinNorthAmericaassignseats,keepsuspectedbulliesclosetothefront.
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
西藏森林面积717万公顷,活立木蓄积量达20.91亿立方米,保存有中国最大的原始森林。为了保护西藏的生态环境,政府实行限额采伐,以严格控制森林的采伐规模,每年的商品性采伐量一直控制在15万立方米以内。//同时,对采伐基地进行及时更新,恢复森林植被。在影响长
如果你认为多媒体只是可以在家中单独享用的东西,你应该再想一想。银行处在“信息高速公路”的前沿,因为它们对这种技术比任何其他类型的民用企业投资更多。以资产在美国银行中排列第四的摩根公司为例。它开发了一种系统,借助一支电子笔就能在计算机屏幕上快速完成
A、Lowdomesticdemand.B、Highenergycost.C、Deflation.D、WeakereconomicgrowthintheU.S.andChina.B根据原文第一段最后一句“...Japan’s
A、optimisticB、pessimisticC、cautiousD、unconfidentA通过支持性细节理解中心句中重要短语的含义。本题expect的正确含义,需根据其后句的支持性细节描写来判断。
世界每天都在变小。全球化、信息革命和通信使居住在这个星球的人们更紧密地联系在一起。关键词汇:globalization(全球化);revolution(革命)。closely-knit(紧密结合)。难点:词汇的理解和三个并列主语的记录。关键词globali
悉尼(Sydney)是个非常现代化的城市,但也有许多历史名胜古迹。在市中心,你依然可以看到一些很久以前就建造在那里的老房子。
ThestylethatUrreahasadoptedtotellTeresita’s—andMexico’s—storyinhisbook"TheHummingbird’sDaughter"partakesoft
随机试题
私募基金募集结算资金专用账户主要用于()。Ⅰ.归集私募基金募集结算资金Ⅱ.给付赎回款项Ⅲ.向投资者分配收益Ⅳ.分配基金清算后的剩余基金财产
对犯罪行为造成的物质损失依法负有赔偿责任并被司法机关传唤应诉的一方当事人是
盆腔脓肿的非手术治疗措施不包括
单位工程质量验收记录表中,验收记录和验收结论分别由( )填写。
评估战略的成功标准有()。
下列作品、作家、时代(国别)及体裁对应正确的一项是______。
[配置路由器信息]Currentconfiguration:!version11.3noservicepassword-encryption!hostnamerouter1
在考生文件夹下,打开文档WORD2.DOCX,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名(WORD2.DOCX)保存文档。【文档开始】姓名数学外语政治语文平均成绩王立9887898
【B1】【B14】
CertainphrasesonecommonlyhearsamongAmericanscapturetheirdevotiontoindividualism:"Doyourownthing.""Ididitmywa
最新回复
(
0
)