首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
admin
2018-06-30
42
问题
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO— has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expectations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s)with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategies, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors— their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid " nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What will the author talk about in the following paragraph?
选项
A、He will continue to talk about the history of RPO.
B、He will talk about the principles of raising the efficiency and end result of the RPO solution.
C、He will talk about the types of RPO.
D、He will talk about different RPO solutions.
答案
B
解析
文中第二段提到“Before we look at those tenets,however,it’s important to under一stand the history of RPO.”即:我们在看这些原则之前,先了解一下招聘流程外包的发展历史,所以,B项符台题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/rjFsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Answeringreceptionist’squestions回答接待员询问
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromtheth
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Customerrelations:howtodefuseangrycustomersB:Recruitment:howtohireane
TASKONE—ADVANTAGE•Forquestions13—17,matchtheextractswiththeadvantages,listedA—H.•Foreachextract,choosetheadv
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
随机试题
哪些材料不适宜进行冷作娇正?
女,20岁,系统性红斑狼疮患者,狼疮肾,尿蛋白持续(++),足量糖皮质激素治疗4周无效,应
手术前常规禁食的主要目的是
某企业距其企业章程规定的经营期限只剩5年,到期后不再继续经营。预计未来5年的预期收益额为100万元、110万元、120万元、120万元和130万元。5年后,该企业变现预计可收回1000万元。假定折现率为10%,则该企业价值最有可能为()万元。
下列各项中,能表明固定资产可能发生了减值的有()。
某企业2017年度的利润总额为1000万元,其中包括本年收到的国库券利息收入10万元;税收罚款支出10万元,企业适用的所得税税率为25%。该企业2017年所得税费用为()万元。
《村民委员会组织法》把村民自治的活动范围一般局限在()内。
在CRM中,体现企业曾经为客户提供的产品和服务的历史数据,如用户产品使用情况的调查数据、客服人员的建议数据和广告数据等,属于()。
规定输入的字符串中只包含字母和*号。请编写函数fun,其功能是:使字符串的前导木号不得多于n个,若多于n个,则删除多余的*号;若少于或等于n个,则不做处理。字符串中间和尾部的*号不删除。例如,字符串中的内容为“*******A*BC*DEF*G****”
Thefirstandsmallestunitthatcanbediscussed【21】______relationtolanguageistheword.Inspeaking,thechoiceofwor
最新回复
(
0
)