首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
admin
2011-12-20
42
问题
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinctive activity. No other discipline has produced as much in such a short period. It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time, but for sheer industry, the business school deserve credit. Not a day goes by without another wave of research papers, books, articles, and journals.
In these terms, schools have produced a generally accepted theoretical basis for management. When it comes to knowledge creation, however, they find themselves in difficulties. They are caught between the need for academic rigour and for real-world business relevance, which tend to pull in opposite directions. The desire to establish management as a credible discipline leads to research that panders to traditional academic criteria. The problem for business school researchers is that they seek the approval of their academic peers rather than the business community. In the United States this has led to the sort of grand ’paper clip counting’ exercises that meet demands for academic rigour but fail to add one iota to the real sum of human knowledge.
Business schools have too often allowed the constraints of the academic world to cloud their view of the real world. Business school researchers seek provable theories rather than helpful theories. They have championed a prescriptive approach to management based on analysis and, more recently, on fashionable ideas that soon disappear into the ether. The one best way approach encourages researchers to mould the idiosyncrasies of managerial reality into their tightly defined models of behaviour. Figures and statistics are fitted into linear equations and tidy models. Economists and other social scientists label this cure smoothing. Meanwhile, reality continually refuses to cooperate.
Central to this is the tension between relevance and rigour. In a perfect world, there would be no need to choose between the two. But in the business school world, the need to satisfy academic criteria and be published in journals often tilts the balance away from relevance. In other words, it is often easier to pursue quantifiable objectives than it is to add anything useful to the debate about management. To a large extent, the entire business school system works against useful, knowledge-creating research. Academics have five years in which to prove themselves if they are to make the academic grade. It seems long enough. But it can take two or even three years to get into a suitable journal. They therefore have around three years, probably less, to come up with an area of interest and carry out meaningful and original research. This is a demanding timescale. The temptation must be to slice up old data in new ways rather than pursue genuinely groundbreaking, innovative research.
It is a criticism also made by some business school insiders. "Academic journals tend to find more and more techniques for testing more and more obscure theories. They are asking trivial questions and answering them exactly. There has to be a backlash," says Julian Birkinshaw of London Business School. In large part, the problem goes back to a time when business schools were trying to establish themselves. Up until the 1960s, American business schools were dismissed as pseudo-academic institutions, including the universities of which they often formed a part, regarded them as a little more than vocational colleges. Since then, most of the leading schools have undergone major reassessments and introduced sweeping changes. However, it is questionable whether those changes have gone far enough.
What does the first paragraph suggest about the research generated by business schools?
选项
A、Its quality is variable.
B、Its lasting value is uncertain.
C、It has always been produced too quickly.
D、It has had no influence on management.
答案
B
解析
第一段第三句指出“It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time”,即这些研究成果能否经得起时间考验还不确定,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/piwUFFFM
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Thebasicpeople’scourt
creativetransposition
"Othercountrieshaveaclimate;inEnglandwehaveweather."Thisstatement,oftenmadebyEnglishmentodescribethepeculia
Anewspaperismuchmorethanabusiness;itisaninstitution.Itreflectsandinfluencesthelifeofacommunity;itmayaffec
public-privatepartnership
Haveyoueverbeenaflowergirl,abridesmaid,orcaughtthebouquetatafriend’swedding?Allofthesecustomsareexpecteda
“Weareinterestedincontentthatpeoplewanttosharepartlyforpragmaticreasons.”这句话准确的汉语翻译是()。
PopstarstodayenjoyastyleoflivingwhichwasoncetheprerogativeonlyofRoyalty.Wherevertheygo,peopleturnoutinthe
Whentheyoungmanrealizedthatthepolicehadspottedhim,hemade______theexitasquicklyaspossible,onlytofindthatt
Sincethelate1970’sinthefaceofaseverelossofmarketshareindozensofindustries,manufacturersintheUnitedStatesh
随机试题
书刊外表的主要部位不包括()。
臣药的含义包括
A、风池、太冲、合谷、内关、后溪B、风池、百会、悬颅、侠溪、行间C、上星、头维、合谷、阿是穴D、百会、通天、行间、阿是穴E、率谷、太阳、侠溪、内庭治疗前头痛风邪袭络证,应首选
不属于喷雾剂质量评价项目的是()。
审计全过程的中间环节是()
某家公司制造产品多年,过去一直受政策保护,经营十分顺利,营业额节节上升,收益率尚佳。近年来,由于市场国际化、消费者消费习性多元化,致使该公司在既有产业的市场竞争上节节败退,加之现存经营包袱颇重,也增加了经营上的压力。鉴于此,该公司除积极地进行总体经营体制改
根据需要的不同性质,可以将动机分为()。
简述班级授课制的优缺点。
一位教师讲《失街亭》一文时,首选就提出:“究竟是谁失街亭?”这样的导入方法叫()。
要在D盘当前文件夹下建立一个名为InfoBase.dat的顺序文件,应使用的语句是
最新回复
(
0
)