首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
40
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Psychopathic or Machiavellian people are expected to make the laws probably because
选项
A、common people are tired of the current policy-makers.
B、policy-making will be based on utilitarianism.
C、they are good at making laws and policies.
D、they are likely to bring up brand-new policies.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/2eMYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
______canbedefinedasthestudyofhowspeakersusethesentencesofthelanguagetoaffectsuccessfulcommunication.
MyclassatHarvardBusinessSchoolhelpsstudentsunderstandwhatgoodmanagementtheoryisandhowitisbuilt.Ineachsessio
WhatdidtheresearchersdiscoverinnorthernKenya?
Thebizarreanticsofsleepwalkershavepuzzledpolice,perplexedscientists,andfascinatedwritersforcenturies.Thereisan
Aperiodofclimatechangeabout130,000yearsagowouldhavemadewatertraveleasierbyloweringsealevelsandcreatingnavig
InformationSuperhighwayatWorkThechangesinhowwecommunicatemakeitnecessarytochangehowwethinkaboutcommunicat
Theladycalledpoliceimmediately,butwhenthepolicearrived,thethiefhadalreadygotcleanlyaway.
中国是人类文明最早的发源地之一,中华文明也是世界上最古老的文明之一。从文字、青铜器等在中国出现并被使用开始,古老的中华大地便迎来了古代文明的晨曦。造纸术、火药、印刷术、指南针等发明,是中华民族对世界文明的突出贡献。孔子、老子等伟大思想家在两千多年前创立的哲
Thefirstfallofsnowisnotonlyaneventbutitisamagicalevent.Yougotobedinonekindofworldandwakeuptofindyo
WhyisthereaGermany?PartoftheanswergoesbacktoabattlefoughtinA.D.9inthetreacherousmarshesanddensethickets
随机试题
茄子的果实为瓠果,食用价值较高。()
以下对早期溶血诊断最有价值的检查是
增感屏的相对感度指的是
链霉素过敏试验液0.1ml含链霉素的量是
律师邹某受法律援助机构指派,担任未成年人陈某的辩护人。关于邹某的权利,下列哪些说法是正确的?(2015/2/73)
下面是某老师执教《接近整百、整千数加减法的简便计算》的片断,请你从数学思想方法的角度进行分析。教学片断:人教版实验教材二年级下册《统计》一课。新课结束之后,学生做课后的“做一做”,要求:统计佳美电器商店一个星期电视机的销售情况。统计表如下:统计的
奥苏伯尔将有意义学习分为()。
伴随淘宝商城的双十一的火爆热销,电了商务进一步深入寻常百姓家,已成为街头巷尾热议的话题。电予商务已经不再是_______的少年,也不是_______的青春期,而是大量知名品牌齐聚,正在步入_______的而立之年。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
我国宪法的地位体现在()
EffectiveFriday,ScreenActorsGuild-AmericanFederationofTelevisionandRadioArtists(SAG-AFTRA)hasdeclaredastrikeagai
最新回复
(
0
)