首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2015-09-26
32
问题
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeep and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants-. "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism. " If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U. S. , warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, And May Complicate Pregnancy. " What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings("Smokers die earlier")or esteem-related warnings("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal; Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid(病态的)warning on a cigarette label may actually backfire.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou(自以为是的)customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelting like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
According to Christian Jarrett, which of the following signs can make a student motivated by self-esteem stop smoking?
选项
A、Cherish Your Health, Stop Smoking
B、Smoking Makes Your Heart Stop Earlier
C、Enjoy a Cigarette, Regret a Whole Life
D、You Look More Charming Without a Cigarette
答案
D
解析
推理题。第五段第六句说明了Christian Jarrett的研究结果:从抽烟中获得自尊心的那些学生,当他们看到与死亡相关的警告和那些与自尊心相关的警告的时候,前者会令他们更加积极地看待吸烟。据此可以推出,[D]“不吸烟,你看上去更有吸引力”是属于与自尊心相关的警示牌,故为正确答案。[A]“珍惜你的健康,停止吸烟”、[B]“吸烟使你更早地死亡”和[C]“享受一支烟,后悔一辈子”均是与死亡有关的警示牌,所以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/a9KMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
ThethreebiggestliesinAmericanare:(1)"Thecheckisinthemail."(2)"OfcourseI’11respectyouinthemorning."(3)"I
Smoking,whichmaybeapleasureforsomepeople,isaserioussourceofdiscomfortfortheirfellows.【C1】______,medicalautho
Insuchachanging,complexsocietyformerlysimplesolutionstoinformationalneedsbecomecomplicated.Manyoflife’sproblems
Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolvedaroundtheearth.An【C1】______7%did
Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults,21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolvedaroundtheearth.An【C1】______7%did
GraduationCeremoniesMayandJunearethemonthswhenmostAmericancollegesanduniversitiesholdtheircommencements./T
Globalwarmingisthegradualincreaseofthetemperatureoftheearth’sloweratmosphereasaresultoftheincreaseingreenho
AnnaDouglaswas72yearsoldwhenshestartedwritinghernewspapercolumn.Shehadbeenthedirectorofaschoolandacampbe
AntonioSanzmightaswellhavewonthelottery.In1965,whenthesmall,curly-hairedSpaniardwas10,anAmericanprofessoras
AntonioSanzmightaswellhavewonthelottery.In1965,whenthesmall,curly-hairedSpaniardwas10,anAmericanprofessoras
随机试题
茶叶的保健功效与茶叶的品质高低无关。()
某女患者因发热、腰痛、尿频、尿急、尿痛就就医,确诊为急性肾盂肾炎,尿化验的特点是()。
患儿7岁,左下Ⅰ松动Ⅲ度,左下1舌侧部分萌出,拔左下Ⅰ时最适合采用
A.各种原因引起的心神不宁B.阴虚血少之心神不宁C.心火亢盛之心神不宁D.心肾不交之心神不宁E.肝阳上亢之心神不宁远志尤宜于
露置在空气中的氢氧化钠因与二氧化碳反应而部分变质,要除去氢氧化钠中混有的杂质,应加入的适量物质是()。
支票的出票人和商业承兑汇票的承兑人在票据上的签章应为()。
关于资产负债表日后事项,下列说法中正确的有()。
根据下面资料回答问题。2005年全国1%人口抽样调查数据显示,至2005年11月1日零时全国31个省、自治区、直辖市和现役军人的总人口为130628万人,比2000年11月1日零时第五次全国人口普查的总人数增加了4045万人,增长3.2%;年平均
甲、乙均系丰收村村民,因对某块土地的承包经营权发生纠纷,向当地仲裁庭申请仲裁,双方达成调解协议,仲裁庭制作了调解书,关于该调解书的说法正确的是:
有的人睡五个小时就可以开始做事了,有的人睡八个小时还觉得特别累。其实这也没什么奇怪的,因为睡觉时间长短每个人都是不一样的,不是时间越长就休息得越好。关于睡眠时间,可以知道:
最新回复
(
0
)