首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2011-04-11
30
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers, and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U. S. -born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
We can learn from the fourth paragraph that______.
选项
A、immigration will bring about noneconomic benefits
B、immigration will bring about some social problems
C、immigration will raise issues of law and fairness
D、immigration should be considered carefully
答案
B
解析
我们可以从第四段中得知 。文章第四段主要探讨移民可能带来的社会问题,如文化融合、边境安全和社会公平等问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ytpYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Becausesomeresourcesmustbeallocatedatthenationallevel,wehavecreatedpolicieswhichreflecttheaggregatedattributes
Doyourememberallthoseyearswhenscientistsarguedthatsmokingwouldkillusbutthedoubtersinsistedthatwedidn’tknow
牡丹以其形美色艳、品种繁多,素有“花中之王”“国色天香”的美誉,深受国人的喜爱。牡丹又以其雍容华贵、光彩照人的外形,成为富贵、吉祥的象征,因而人们常常把牡丹与繁荣、昌盛和幸福连缀在一起。千百年来,文人墨客以牡丹为题,创造出无数名句绝响,给观赏者增添了无限的
TheexpandingInternationalSpaceStationhaslivingspace,alaboratory,storagemodulesandsolarpowerpanels.Nowitwillge
TheexpandingInternationalSpaceStationhaslivingspace,alaboratory,storagemodulesandsolarpowerpanels.Nowitwillge
从20世纪下半叶起,英语作为全球通用语言的地位进一步得到巩固和发展。英语已经不再是非英语国家和英语国家的人们进行交流时的工具,而更多地成为非英语国家之间的人们进行沟通的共用语言。英语在非英语国家的发展已经造成了许多带有浓厚地域特色的变体,它们的诞生已经或将
人类社会的发展进入了快车道。现代都市文明的产物——抑郁症等心理或精神疾病正开始折磨着人们。心理学家和医生认为21世纪将是心理疾病高发时代。据估计,本世纪大约有3%的人需要心理治疗。大部分人的心理问题可以通过自我调整来控制。不少学者指出,我们应该更加
TheidealseasonforplantingthecropinthemainfieldisJuly-AugustorNovember-December.Plantingisdoneonraisedbedsof
TheidealseasonforplantingthecropinthemainfieldisJuly-AugustorNovember-December.Plantingisdoneonraisedbedsof
随机试题
Listentothefollowingpassage.Altogetherthepassagewillbereadtoyoufourtimes.Duringthefirstreading,whichwillbe
一切唯心主义者都主张()。
A.寻常性间质性肺炎(UIP)B.脱屑性间质性肺炎(DIP)C.非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)D.急性间质性肺炎(AIP)E.隐源性机化性肺炎(COP)
A.金黄色葡萄球菌B.厌氧菌C.肺炎克雷伯杆菌D.肺炎链球菌E.肺炎支原体男,66岁。慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,“上感”后出现高热、咳嗽、脓痰伴痰中带血。胸部X线片示右上肺大片状影,其内可见多个圆形透亮区,叶间隙略下移,最可能感染的病原体是(
连翘用高效液相色谱法测定()
可转换债券的价格通常在理论价值之上,转换价值之上。()
下列情形中,注册会计师认为通常适合采用信息技术控制的有()。
冬至日,小明、小红、小丽、小强各吃了一种食物,分别是饺子、汤圆、面条、米饭。已知:①小明没吃饺子,也没吃米饭;②小红没吃饺子,也没吃面条;③如果小明没吃面条,那么小强也没吃饺子;④小丽既没吃饺子,也没吃米饭。由此可以推出:
曲线()
模式也称为概念模式,它是对数据库全体数据的______的描述。
最新回复
(
0
)