首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Touch-Screen Generation A)On a chilly day last spring, a few dozen developers of children’s apps(应用程序)for phones and tablets
The Touch-Screen Generation A)On a chilly day last spring, a few dozen developers of children’s apps(应用程序)for phones and tablets
admin
2014-08-25
18
问题
The Touch-Screen Generation
A)On a chilly day last spring, a few dozen developers of children’s apps(应用程序)for phones and tablets(平板电脑)gathered at an old beach resort in Monterey, California, to show off their games. The gathering was organized by Warren Buckleitner, a longtime reviewer of interactive children’s media. Buckleitner spent the breaks testing whether his own remote-control helicopter could reach the hall’s second story, while various children who had come with their parents looked up in awe(敬畏)and delight. But mostly they looked down, at the iPads and other tablets displayed around the hall like so many open boxes of candy. I walked around and talked with developers, and several quoted a famous saying of Maria Montessori’s, " The hands are the instruments of man’s intelligence. "
B)What, really, would Maria Montessori have made of this scene? The 30 or so children here were not down at the shore poking(戳)their fingers in the sand or running them along stones or picking seashells. Instead they were all inside, alone or in groups of two or three, their faces a few inches from a screen, their hands doing things Montessori surely did not imagine.
C)In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics updated its policy on very young children and media. In 1999, the group had discouraged television viewing for children younger than 2, citing research on brain development that showed this age group’s critical need for " direct interactions with parents and other significant care givers. " The updated report began by acknowledging that things had changed significantly since then. In 2006, 90% of parents said that their children younger than 2 consumed some form of electronic media. Nevertheless, the group took largely the same approach it did in 1999, uniformly discouraging passive media use, on any type of screen, for these kids.(For older children, the academy noted, " high-quality programs" could have " educational benefits. ")The 2011 report mentioned "smart cell phone" and "new screen" technologies, but did not address interactive apps. Nor did it bring up the possibility that has likely occurred to those 90% of American parents that some good might come from those little swiping(在电子产品上刷)fingers.
D)I had come to the developers’ conference partly because I hoped that this particular set of parents, enthusiastic as they were about interactive media, might help me out of this problem, that they might offer some guiding principle for American parents who are clearly never going to meet the academy’s ideals, and at some level do not want to. Perhaps this group would be able to express clearly some benefits of the new technology that the more cautious doctors weren’t ready to address.
E)I fell into conversation with a woman who had helped develop Montessori Letter Sounds, an app that teaches preschoolers the Montessori methods of spelling. She was a former Montessori teacher and a mother of four. I myself have three children who are all fans of the touch screen. What games did her kids like to play, I asked, hoping for suggestions I could take home.
"They don’t play all that much. "
Really? Why not?
"Because I don’t allow it. We have a rule of no screen time during the week, unless it’s clearly
educational. "
No screen time? None at all? That seems at the outer edge of restrictive, even by the standards of
overcontrolling parents.
" On the weekends, they can play. I give them a limit of half an hour and then stop. Enough. "
F)Her answer so surprised me that I decided to ask some of the other developers who were also parents what their domestic ground rules for screen time were. One said only on airplanes and long car rides. Another said Wednesdays and weekends, for half an hour. The most permissive said half an hour a day, which was about my rule at home. At one point I sat with one of the biggest developers of e-book apps for kids, and his family. The small kid was starting to fuss in her high chair, so the mom stuck an iPad in front of her and played a short movie so everyone else could enjoy their lunch. When she saw me watching, she gave me the universal tense look of mothers who feel they are being judged. "At home," she assured me, "I only let her watch movies in Spanish. "
G)By their reactions, these parents made me understand the problem of our age: as technology becomes almost everywhere in our lives, American parents are becoming more, not less, distrustful of what it might be doing to their children. Technological ability has not, for parents, translated into comfort and ease. On the one hand, parents want their children to swim expertly in the digital stream that they will have to navigate(航行)all their lives; on the other hand, they fear that too much digital media, too early, will sink them. Parents end up treating tablets as precision surgical(外科的)instruments, devices that might perform miracles for their child’s IQ and help him win some great robotics competition—but only if they are used just so. Otherwise, their child could end up one of those sad, pale creatures who can’t make eye contact and has a girlfriend who lives only in the virtual world.
H)Norman Rockwell, a 20th-century artist, never painted Boy Swiping Finger on Screen, and our own vision of a perfect childhood has never been adjusted to accommodate that now-common scene. Add to that our modern fear that every parenting decision may have lasting consequences—that every minute of enrichment lost or mindless entertainment indulged(放纵的)will add up to some permanent handicap(障碍)in the future—and you have deep guilt and confusion. To date, no body of research has proved that the iPad will make your preschooler smarter or teach her to speak Chinese, or alternatively that it will rust her nervous system—the device has been out for only three years, not much more than the time it takes some academics to find funding and gather research subjects. So what is a parent to do?
Research shows interaction with people is key to babies’ brain development.
选项
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/jI9FFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Thecinemaissomedistanceawayfromwheretheyare.B、Hewouldliketoreadthefilmreviewinthenewspaper.C、Theyshould
AmericansandTheirCarsA)Ithasbeenoneoftheworld’smostenduringandpassionateloveaffairs:Americansandtheircars.I
中国是个礼仪(amenity)之邦,凡事注重规矩。就拿喝酒来说,也有很多有意思的事儿。比如在宴席上,如果想表示对长辈或者上级的尊重,晚辈就会主动举杯敬酒(toast),在喝掉酒之前,两个人会碰一下酒杯表示亲近,碰杯的时候,晚辈举杯不能比长辈高,这表示尊重。
A、TheachievementtheancientEgyptiansmadeinmanyaspects.B、HowtheancientEgyptiansbuildvariousships.C、Howtheancient
A、Studentsoftencomplainaboutteachers.B、Ateacherwillbeconsideredunqualifiedifastudentdoesn’tunderstandhim.C、Teac
Britonsareincreasinglyentertainingguestsathomewithdinner,filmandkaraokenights,(1)______bytelevisionshowsoncookin
MostAmericansconsiderthemselvesfriendlypeople.(1)______inthesouthernUnitedStates,inparticular,takeprideinentertai
A、Teensmokersarepricesensitive.B、Tobaccotaxesimprovepublichealth.C、Tobaccoindustryfiercelyfightsthetaxrise.D、So
Menarespendingmoreandmoretimeinthekitchenencouragedbycelebritychefs(名人厨师)likeGordonRamsayandJamieOliver,accor
A、Toabarbershop.B、Tothegrocer’s.C、Toabookstore.D、Toarestaurant.B结合对话中女士说的Pickupabarofsoapandaloafofbread,
随机试题
简述马歇尔计划的内容与影响。(辽宁大学2014年历史学专业基础真题)
非职位权力包括( )
以下所列项目不属白色主病范围者为
风瘙痒湿疮
黄教授在2004年6月开始一本学术专著的写作,该专著于2005年7月定稿,2005年12月由出版社出版,2006年1月进行了版权登记。请综合分析本案所涉及的法律问题。
使用软梯上下船舶应设专人监护,并备有带安全绳的救生圈。()
常见的建设工程索赔不包括( )。
根据《保险法》第49条规定,保险人、被保险人为查明和确定保险事故的性质、原因和保险标的的损失程度所支付的必要的、合理的费用,应由( )。
在计算基金资产总值时,基金拥有的上市股票、认股权证是以计算日集中交易市场的()为准。
中国知识分子试图通过弘扬传统文化,加强对国学的深入研究来实现传统文化的伟大复兴。然而在目前这种专业化技术化的大趋势下,中国哲学的研究越是繁荣,它的社会影响就越小,因为专业化技术化拒绝大众的理解,于是哲学工作者的“科研成果”就成了学术共同体小圈子自我欣赏的作
最新回复
(
0
)