首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so
admin
2009-08-13
39
问题
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so it is with plants—at least, that is the conclusion of a paper published in Biology Letters by Naomi Cappuccino, of Carleton University, and Thor Arnason, of the University of Ottawa, both in Canada.
The phenomenon of alien species popping up unexpected parts of the world has grown over the past few decades as people and goods become more mobile and plant seeds and animal larvae have hitched along for the ride. Most such aliens blend into the ecosystem in which they arrive without too much fuss. (Indeed, many probably fail to establish themselves at all—but those failures, of course, are never noticed.) Occasionally, though, something goes bananas and starts trying to take the place over, and an invasive species is born. Dr. Cappuccino and Dr. Arnason asked themselves why.
One hypothesis is that aliens leave their predators behind. Since the predators in their new homelands are not adapted to exploit them, they are able to reproduce unchecked. That is a nice idea, but it does not explain why only certain aliens become invasive. Dr. Cappuccino and Dr. Arnason suspected this might be because native predators are sometimes "pre-adapted" to the aliens’ defences, but in other cases they are not.
To test this, they had first to establish a reliable list of invaders. That is not as easy as it sounds. As they observe, "although there are many lists of invasive species published by governmental agencies, inclusion of a given species in the lists may not be entirely free of political motivation". Instead, they polled established researchers in the field of alien species, asking each to list ten invasive species and, for comparison, ten aliens that just rubbed along quietly with their neighbours. The result was a list of 21 species widely agreed to be invasive and, for comparison, 18 non-invasive aliens.
Having established these lists, they went to the library to find out what was known about the plants’ chemistry. Their aim was to find the most prominent chemical weapon in each plant, whether that weapon was directed against insects that might want to eat the plant, bacteria and fungi that might want to infect it, or other plants that might compete for space, water, nutrients and light. Botanists know a lot about which sorts of compounds have what roles, so classifying constituent chemicals in this way was not too hard.
The researchers then compared the chemical arsenals of their aliens with those of native North American plants, to see if superior (or, at least, unusual) weaponry was the explanation for the invaders’ success. Their hypothesis was that highly invasive species would have chemical weapons not found in native plants, and which pests, parasites and other plants would therefore not have evolved any resistance to. The more benign aliens, by contrast, were predicted to have arsenals also found in at least some native species.
And so it proved. More than 40% of the invasive species had a chemical unknown to native plants, just over 10% of the non-invasive aliens had such a chemical. Moreover, when they looked at past studies on alien plants that had examined how much such plants suffer from the depredations of herbivorous insects, they found that the extent of the damage reported was significantly correlated with the number of native species with which that alien shared its principal chemical weapon.
For alien plants, then, the real secret of success—also as in human warfare—is surprise. It is not that the chemicals concerned are more toxic in any general sense (indeed, successful invaders are often rare in their own native habitats). Rather, it is that the locals just don’t see them coming.
选项
A、plant seeds are resistant to antibiotics.
B、people tend to hitch a ride.
C、there are more circulation of goods.
D、animal larvae become stronger.
答案
C
解析
本题是细节题。由题干中的关键词alien species定位至第二段。首句明确指出:过去的几十年,随着人和货物的流动日益频繁,植物种子和动物幼体也乘机“搭便车”四处播散,世界各地无意间出现了越来越多的外来物种。可见,货物流动增多是外来物种入侵的原因之一,故[C]为答案。[A]及[D]未提及,排除。这里搭便车的主体是plant seeds和animal larvae,并非people,[B]属于张冠李戴,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/bv9YFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Whichofthefollowingstatementsistrueaccordingtowhatyouhear?
TheAlaskaGovernorhastakenthefollowingstepsinresponsetothePrudhoeBayoilfieldshutdownEXCEPT.
TheAlaskaGovernorhastakenthefollowingstepsinresponsetothePrudhoeBayoilfieldshutdownEXCEPT.
Accordingtothespeaker,thefirstmodernOlympicGameswereheldasaninternationalcompetition.
Accordingtopsychologists,acompulsivespenderwantstospendalotofmoneybecause:
Whatisconsideredtobetheoperatingstandardforglobalcommunication?
Theeconomyurgesthegovernmenttotakemeasurestocountertheinflationandloweringsalaries.
OnethingisclearafterthetragicdeathofFreddieGray,theyoungAfrican-Americanmanwhowasfatallyinjuredwhileinpolic
A、CheneyandKerryB、BushandKerryC、CheneyandtheheadofDemocraticPartyD、TheheadsofDemocraticandRepublicpartiesC
随机试题
设函数f(x)在[a,b]上连续,在(a,b)内二阶可导,f(a)=f(b)=0且f′++(a)f′(b)>0,证明:存在ξ∈(a,b),使得f″(ξ)+2f(ξ)=3f′(ξ).
该病例最可能的诊断是该病例与良性婴儿肌阵挛区别,下列哪点不符合良性婴儿肌阵挛的诊断要点
某矿建单位施工一半圆拱形巷道,该巷道设计净断面宽4.8m,锚喷支护,每断面布置13根锚杆,间排距800mm×100m,锚杆长2.0m。施工计划确定月进尺180m,四六制作业,采用三掘一喷,掘进进尺2.2m。施工队安排的工序质量检查规定,当日施工完成的内容
建设工程项目的组织风险有()。
请阅读下列材料:“电子表格的制作”是人教版七年级上册第三单元第9课的内容。其内容主要包括:Excel的启动与退出;Excel的窗口组成;工作簿、工作表的概念及其关系;单元格的概念及表示;数据的输入和修改等内容。Excel与Word属于同一家族,本
下列说法与“少小离家老大回,乡音无改鬓毛衰”所蕴涵的哲学寓意相一致的是()。
下列语句中有语病的一句为()。
Thedoctorreceivedan(urge)______callfromtheparentsoftheinjuredchild.
【B1】【B6】
A、Thesurroundings.B、Thecumulativeinfluenceofotherpeople.C、Thegovernment’sintervention.D、Socialtrend.B
最新回复
(
0
)