首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, ta
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, ta
admin
2019-09-23
30
问题
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, taxpayers who wish to should be able to read about it without further expense. And science advances through cross-fertilization between projects. Barriers to that exchange slow it down.
There is a widespread feeling that the journal publishers who have mediated this exchange for the past century or more are becoming an impediment to it. One of the latest converts is the British government. Recently it announced that, the results of taxpayer-financed research would be available, free and online, for anyone to read and redistribute.
Britain’s government is not alone. Soon the European Union followed suit. In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NIH, the single biggest source of civilian research funds in the world) has required open-access publishing since 2008. And the Wellcome Trust, a British foundation that is the world’s second-biggest charitable source of scientific money, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also insists that those who receive its support should make their work available free.
Criticism of journal publishers usually boils down to two things. One is that their processes take months, when the Internet could enable them to take days. The other is that because each paper is like a mini-monopoly, which workers in the field have to read if they are to advance their own research, there is no incentive to keep the price down. The publishers thus have scientists — or, more accurately, their universities, which pay the subscriptions — in an armlock. That, combined with the fact that the raw material (manuscripts of papers) is free, leads to generous returns. In 2011, Elsevier, a large Dutch publisher, made a profit of £768 million on revenues of £2.06 billion — a margin of 37 percent. Indeed, Elsevier’s profits are thought so
egregious
by many people that 12,000 researchers have signed up to boycott the company’s journals.
Publishers do provide a service. They organize peer reviews, in which papers are criticized anonymously by experts (though those experts, like the authors of papers, are seldom paid for what they do). They also sort the scientific sheep from the goats, by deciding what gets published, and where. That gives the publishers huge power. Since researchers, administrators and grant-awarding bodies all take note of which work has got through this filtering mechanism, the competition to publish in the best journals is intense, and the system becomes self-reinforcing, increasing the value of those journals still further.
But not, perhaps, for much longer. Support has been swelling for open-access scientific publishing: doing it online, in a way that allows anyone to read papers free of charge. The movement started among scientists themselves, but governments are paying attention and asking whether they might also benefit from the change.
Much remains to be worked out. Some fear the loss of the traditional journals’ curation and verification of research. Even Sir Mark Walport, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a fierce advocate of open-access publication, worries that the newly liberated papers have ended up in different places rather than being consolidated in the way they want.
A revolution, then, has begun. Technology permits it; researchers and politicians want it. If scientific publishers are not trembling in their boots, they should be.
Before the publication of papers, peer reviews are to______.
选项
A、differentiate papers
B、evaluate them
C、exercise the power of publishers
D、add the value of journals
答案
B
解析
细节题。根据关键词定位原文第5段第2句,大意为“出版社组织同行评审专家对论文进行匿名评审”,故选B(评估论文)。值得注意的是,选项A(区分论文)也与题意接近,但不如B准确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Vt1YFFFM
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
A、learningprocessinparticularB、eitherofthetwoprocessesC、theinteractionsbetweenthetwoprocessesD、maturationprocess
A、tothelocalgovernmentB、intothecountryinwhichtheyhavebeenbuiltC、abroadD、tothelocalinhabitantsC推理判断题。关于一些旅馆的利润,
FightingAgainstHungerVocabularyandExpressionsmicronutrientsroadmapdonoragenciessmallholderfoodsecurityp
ShouldUrbanGrowthbeRestricted?VocabularyandExpressionsrepercussionAbercrombiePlanoptimalaccommodateaut
TheTrendsofChineseTouristsTravellingAbroadVocabularyandExpressionsshoppingtourdutyfreeproductsTahitiM
Onwhichdayisthehotelavailable?
AccordingtotheWorldHealthOrganization,airpollutionkillsabout________aroundtheworldeachyear.
Thereportbelievesthatsomecompaniestendtofalsifyabloodtestresult.
WhatshouldAmericantechcompaniesdotosecuretheirsuccess?
It’snotthatweareafraidofseeinghimstumble,ofscribblingamustacheoverhiscareer.Sure,thenicepartofuswantsMik
随机试题
乙胺丁醇的主要不良反应是
复发性口腔溃疡治疗措施中哪项效果最佳?
A.水杨酸B.口服避孕药、雄激素和蛋白同化类激素C.异烟肼、甲氨蝶呤、苯妥英钠D.甲氨蝶呤、烟酸、维生素AE.氯丙嗪、三环类抗抑郁药可导致肝纤维化和肝硬化的药物是
关于民事仲裁与民事诉讼的区别,下列哪一选项是正确的?(2011年卷三第36题)
中世纪欧洲城市的主要天际轮廓线是以()为主导的。
为避免罚款,证券经营机构对资金交收账户出现的透支必须在()。
企业在对担保申请人进行资信调查和风险评估时,应当重点关注的事项包括()。
1867年,出售阿拉斯加给美国的是()
(2016年第14题)我国宪法将“国家尊重和保障人权”规定为一项基本原则。法律的重要使命就是充分尊重和保障人权,人权的法律保障包括宪法保障、立法保障、行政保护和司法保障。其中,宪法保障是
1924年1月,国民党一大在广州召开,大会通过的宣言对三民主义作出了新的解释,具体表现为()
最新回复
(
0
)