首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States h
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States h
admin
2011-12-20
28
问题
Since the late 1970’s in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the United States have been trying to improve productivity—and therefore enhance their international competitiveness—through cost-cutting programs. (Cost-cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) However, from 1978 through 1982, productivity—the value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor input—did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. At the same time, it became clear that the harder manufactures worked to implement cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge.
With this paradox in mind, I recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed. Manufacturing regularly observes a "40, 40, 20" rule. Roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches to materials. Another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. The final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-cutting. This rule does not imply that cost-cutting should not be tried. The well-known tools of this approach—including simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harder—do produce results. But the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute.
Another problem is that the cost-cutting approach hinders innovation and discourages creative people. As Abernathy’s study of automobile manufacturers has shown, an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. And managers under pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. Production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and maximizing output. This dimension of performance has until recently sufficed as a basis of evaluation, but it has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers.
Every company I know that has freed itself from the paradox has done so, in part, by developing and implementing a manufacturing strategy. Such a strategy focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equipment and process technology. In one company a manufacturing strategy that allowed different areas of the factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. Together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. There is hope for manufacturing, but it dearly rests oil a different way of managing.
The author refers to Abernathy’s study most probably in order to ______.
选项
A、qualify an observation about one rule governing manufacturing
B、address possible objections to a recommendation about improving manufacturing competitiveness
C、support an earlier assertion about method of increasing productivity
D、suggest the centrality in the Unit States economy of a particular manufacturing industry
答案
C
解析
“As Abernathy’s study of automobile manufacturers has shown,an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques,reducing its ability to develop new products.”提到Abernathy的研究主要是否定cost-cutting,从而肯定新方法对于提高生产力的帮助。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/VDwUFFFM
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
"Othercountrieshaveaclimate;inEnglandwehaveweather."Thisstatement,oftenmadebyEnglishmentodescribethepeculia
ScientistsShedNewLightOnTheBody’sRhythmsHaveyoueversufferedfromjet-lag,thefatigueanddepressionthatcomes
"Gender",astheWorldHealthOrganizationdefinesit,"isusedtodescribethosecharacteristicsofwomenandmen,whichareso
"Thedistinctionbetweenlangueandparole"wasfirstputforwardby().
Despitethefactthatthecommission’sreporttreatsavitallyimportanttopic,thereportwillbe______readbecauseitsprose
Ofallthingsbanishthe______outofyourconversation,andneverthinkofentertainingpeoplewithyourownpersonalconcerns
Atpresent,thereisaheateddiscussioninChinaonwhetherpeopleshouldbeencouragedtobuycarsornot.Youaresupposedto
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabureaucraticmanagementinwhichmanbecomesasmall,
Foramanwhowantstheworldtoslowdown,CarlHonore’smomentofclaritycamein,ofallplaces,anairport.TheCanadianjo
"I’vebeenexpectingyou!"Marekrepeated,whenhehadseatedhisguestinacomfortableleatherchair.Nothingonearthwould
随机试题
A.链霉素B.氯霉素C.林可霉素D.嘌呤霉素E.白喉毒素
外周血涂片中,几乎不可能出现原始和幼稚细胞的是
某医生对一批计量、计数资料实验数据的假设检验,结果判定如下A.P>0.05B.P<0.05C.P<0.01D.P=0.05E.P=0.01
某技术人员对三角形的三个内角进行多次测定,统计三角形闭合差时发现,相差6″的误差次数为5次,相差1″的误差次数为25次,经统计结果体现出的误差特性为()。
仲裁裁决书自()之日起发生法律效力。
关于下滑信标台场地保护区中的敏感区,下列说法正确的有()。
结构性外汇理财产品的客户投资者面临的风险因素有()。
甲公司有三个事业部,分别从事A、B、C三类家电产品的生产和销售。在A、B、C三类产品市场上,甲公司的最大竞争对手是乙公司。下表是A、B、C三类家电产品在2021年的市场销售数据。假设市场增长率和相对市场占有率分别以10%和1.0作为高低
张阳是北京某公司财务部的主管,为了提高公司的日常报账和结算单审核效率,他准备设计一个《经费联审结算单》模板。请根据考生文件夹下“Word素材文件1.docx”和“Word素材文件2.xlsx”帮他完成制作任务,具体要求如下:在考生文件夹下,将素材文件“
Iurgedhim______becausetheroadwasdangerous.
最新回复
(
0
)