首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
48
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What does RPO start with?
选项
A、Third party recruiters
B、Contract recruiting
C、Internal staffing Agency
D、In-house recruitment
答案
A
解析
文中第三段提到“Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives.”即:招聘流程外包是一个演化过程的高峰,这个过程从第三方招聘发展起来,最初是为部门经理服务或是一个公司内部招聘主动权的附属机构。所以,A项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/TTFsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whatdidthemandorecently?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
随机试题
过曲线y=χ2(χ≥0)上某点A作切线,若过点A作的切线,曲线y=χ2及χ轴围成的图形面积为,求该图形绕χ轴旋转一周所得旋转体体积v。
既能行气宽中,又能利水消肿的药物是
患者男,45岁,突然呕血400ml并伴黑便。BP100/70mmHg,心肺(-),可见腹壁静脉曲张,肝未触及,脾于肋下2cm可触及。应首选的治疗为()
尿道下裂术后常见的并发症有
A、附子B、干姜C、肉桂D、吴茱萸E、丁香为补火助阳,回阳救逆之要药的是
在理财产品名称中若含有拟投资资产名称的,则拟投资该资产的比例必须达到该理财产品规模的()或以上。
在评奖会上,A、B、C、D、E、F、G、H竞争一项金奖。由一个专家小组投票,票数最多的将获金奖。如果A的票数多于B,并且C的票数多于D。那么E将获得金奖。如果B的票数多于A,或者F的票数多于G,那么H将获得金奖。如果D的票数多于C,那么F将获得金奖。
下列操作适合使用VBA而非宏的是
TheGreatestMysteryofWhalesThewhaleisawarm-blooded,air-breathinganimal,givingbirthtoitsyoungalive,suckingt
A、 B、 C、 C
最新回复
(
0
)