首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
admin
2018-06-06
40
问题
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant groups think it offers little hope to low-skilled, mostly Hispanic would-be migrants. Right-wingers snarl that it is nothing but an "amnesty" for illegals. Companies, who it had been hoped would support the new compromise, hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers. And the left is complaining because it fears it will depress low-end wages. It would be nice to be able to report that opposition across so full a spectrum is a sign that the bill is a well-crafted compromise. In fact, it may well turn out to be doomed.
That would be a pity, because there are some good things in the proposal. Most important, it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of what to do about the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already in America, most of them working hard at low-paid and disagreeable jobs. Deporting a population the size of Ohio’s is impossible, economically illiterate and morally wrong. The new bill would make the 12 million legal, and offer them a path, though a winding one, to full citizenship.
The right doesn’t like this, of course, and points out that amnesties(which this really isn’t, given the fines and hurdles involved)have in the past drawn fresh waves of migrants. So the other side of the bargain gives conservatives everything they could wish for in terms of razor-wired fences, surveillance drones, armed border guards and a programme that will force companies to check the legality of their workers. Such measures are probably necessary to win support and rebuild trust in the immigration system. No bill would pass without them.
The bad part of the deal is what happens to would-be immigrants once all those sensors and spy-planes are in place. The bill proposes a dual system. A guest-worker programme would allow 400,000 people a year to enter the country to work for two years, after which they must go home for a year, with a six-year cap on the total time they can spend in America. The other part is a new method of granting residence permits, carrying the right to work. Such "green cards" currently go mostly to relatives of American citizens or to people sponsored by an employer. The bill would bring in a "points" system for 380,000 people a year, similar to those in use in Canada and Australia. Permits for family members would be restricted, to cover only spouses and young children. Employers would have less ability to sponsor the people they need.
There are several problems. One is that extended families help build vibrant communities in a way that guest workers don’t. Second, the government should not be in the business of telling companies whom they ought to hire. There are ways round this, such as awarding points not for specific jobs, but still the problem is that most of the green cards will be used up by Indian software designers, Bosnian engineers or the similarly blessed. America does indeed need such folk, but it also needs legions of the less-skilled, too.
That will continue to mean a large, poorly paid and constantly rotating alien underclass with little stake in American society. On May 23rd, the Senate voted to scale the guest worker programme back to 200,000. So the illegals will keep coming—except that now their journey will be still more dangerous and they will be even further beyond the law. The current bill is better than nothing: but unless it is improved, it will not solve the main problem of the illegals.
The good thing about the immigration bill is that______.
选项
A、it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of a large group of immigrants in America
B、it offers better opportunity for legal workers
C、it helps illegal workers to go back to their hometown
D、it helps to change the living situation of 12 million illegal workers
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/OTCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Researchershypothesizethatsharkssometimesconfusehumansforanothertypeofanimalstheyusuallyconsume,differentfromse
An"epigram"isusuallydefinedtobebrightorwittythoughtthatisterselyandingeniouslyexpressed.
Someentrepreneursperceivethemselvespossessedofan______powertochoosesafepartnersintheir"goingglobal"projects.
Chinaisthetopsourcecountryofinternationalstudentsintheworld.Recentstatisticshaveshowna【C1】______trendforChine
OntheInternet,adsarearealproblem.They’reaproblemforus,thepeople,andnotjustbecausetheyclutterupourWebpage
Declininghouseprices,risingjoblayoffs,skyrocketingoilcostsandamajorcreditcrunchhavebroughtconsumerconfidenceto
Onakilltheyshownospecialrelishforliver,heartorkidneysbysinglingthemouttoeatfirstasdelicacies.
当前,亚欧两地区都处于蓬勃发展的阶段。亚洲是世界上最具经济活力的地区,资源丰富,市场广阔,区域合作方兴未艾。欧盟是世界上最大的发达经济体,资本充裕,科技先进,一体化程度高。两地区政治上共识很多,经济上优势互补,文化上各具特色,为开展更广泛和具有实质性的对话
作为一名运动员、教练员和体育管理者,尤其是作为奥运会的技术官员,我最大的体会是:在奥运会中,没有什么比运动员的利益更重要了。我们整个奥运计划的制定是以运动员需要为中心的。//在做任何决定时,我们都要问一问自己,什么对奥运会和残奥会运动员最有利。在国际单项体
Wehaveallheardofcounterfeitingbefore.Usuallyitreferstopeoplemakingmoney—printingitinsteadofearningit.Butcou
随机试题
Ineedtomovetoalargerapartment.Doyouknowofany______onesinthisneighborhood?
用彩色多普勒技术检测由左向右分流的主动脉窦瘤破裂(流向右心室流出道)有什么特征所见
患者,男性,29岁。3年前因消化性溃疡做过“胃大部切除术”,近三月来经常头晕、乏力,心悸,体力逐渐下降,临床诊断为缺铁性贫血。患者贫血的最可能原因是
资源从不同角度可分为()。
围堰施工技术要求中,钢板桩可用()等方法下沉。
适用于人为利润中心之间的往来结算的内部结算价格是()。
浮躁风气和商业投机心理()着学术,一些学者偏离正轨,或见利忘义,粗制滥造,或取媚世俗,热衷炒作。
以下历史事件发生的先后顺序不正确的是()。
下列四组词语中都有错别字,其中只有一个错别字的一组是()。
DemocracyDemocracyisnotanewconcept.TheancientAthenianshadademocraticsystem.TheirdemocracywasthesameasAme
最新回复
(
0
)