首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
admin
2020-11-04
24
问题
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy
[A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, something retail analysts have known for years is now apparent to everyone: The online retailer is on a collision course with Walmart to try to be the predominant seller of pretty much everything you buy. Each one is trying to become more like the other—Walmart by investing heavily in its technology, Amazon by opening physical bookstores and now buying physical supermarkets. But this is more than a battle between two business titans. Their rivalry sheds light on the shifting economics of nearly every major industry.
[B] That in turn has been a boon(福音)for consumers but also has more worrying implications for jobs, wages and inequality. To understand this epic shift, you can look not just to the grocery business, but also to my closet, and to another retail acquisition announced Friday morning.
[C] Men’s dress clothing, mine included, can be a little boring. Like many male office workers, I lean toward clothes that are sharp but not at all showy. Nearly every weekday, I wear a dress shirt that is either light blue, white or has some subtle check pattern, usually paired with slacks and a blazer. The description alone could make a person doze. I used to buy my dress shirts from a Hong Kong tailor. They fit perfectly, but ordering required an awkward meeting with a visiting salesman in a hotel suite. They took six weeks to arrive, and they cost around $ 120 each, which adds up fast when you need to buy eight or 10 a year to keep up with wear and tear(破损). Then several years ago I realized that a company called Bonobos was making shirts that fit me nearly as well, that were often sold three for $ 220, or $ 73 each, and that would arrive in two days.
[D] Bonobos became my main shirt provider, at least until recently, when I learned that Amazon was trying to get into the upper-end men’s shirt game. The firm’s " Buttoned Down" line, offered to Amazon Prime customers, uses high-quality fabric and is a good value at $ 40 for basic shirts. I bought a few: they don’t fit me quite as well as the Bonobos, but I do prefer the stitching(针脚). I’m on the fence as to which company will provide my next shirt order, and a new deal this week makes it interesting: Walmart is buying Bonobos. Walmart’s move might seem a strange decision. It is not a retailer people typically turn to for $ 88 summer weight shirts in Ruby Wynwood Plaid or $ 750 Italian wool suits. Then again, Amazon is best known as a reseller of goods made by others.
[E] Walmart and Amazon have had their sights on each other for years, each aiming to be the dominant seller of goods—however consumers of the future want to buy them. It increasingly looks like that " however" is a hybrid of physical stores and online-ordering channels, and each company is coming at the goal from a different starting point.
[F] Amazon is the dominant player in online sales, and is particularly strong among affluent consumers in major cities. It is now experimenting with physical bookstores and groceries as it looks to broaden its reach. Walmart has thousands of stores that sell hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods. It is particularly strong in suburban and rural areas and among low- and middle-income consumers, but it’s playing catch-up with online sales and affluent urbanites.
[G] Why are these two mega-retailers both trying to sell me shirts? The short answer is because they both want to sell everything. More specifically, Bonobos is known as an innovator in exactly this type of hybrid of online and physical store sales. Its website and online customer service are excellent, and it operates stores in major cities where you can try on garments and order items to be shipped directly. Because all the actual inventory is centralized, the stores themselves can occupy minimal square footage. So the acquisition may help Walmart build expertise in the very areas where it is trying to gain on Amazon. You can look at the Amazon acquisition of Whole Foods through the same lens. The grocery business has a whole different set of challenges from the types of goods that Amazon has specialized in: you can’t store a steak or a banana the way you do books or toys. And people want to be able to make purchases and take them home on the spur of the moment.
[H] Just as Walmart is using Bonobos to get access to higher-end consumers and a more technologically savvy way of selling clothes, Amazon is using Whole Foods to get the expertise and physical presence it takes to sell fresh foods. But bigger dimensions of the modern economy also come into play.
[I] The apparel business has long been a highly competitive industry in which countless players could find a niche(商机). Any insight that one shirt-maker developed could be rapidly copied by others, and consumer prices reflected the retailer’s real estate costs and branding approach as much as anything. That helps explain why there are thousands of options worldwide for someone who wants a decent-quality men’s shirt. In that world, any shirt-maker that tried to get too big rapidly faced diminishing returns. It would have to pay more and more to lease the real estate for far-flung stores, and would have to outbid competitors to hire all the experienced shirt-makers. The expansion wouldn’t offer any meaningful cost savings and would entail a lot more headaches trying to manage it all.
[J] But more and more businesses in the modern economy, rather than reflecting those diminishing returns to scale, show positive returns to scale: The biggest companies have a huge advantage over smaller players. That tends to tilt markets toward a handful of players or even a monopoly, rather than an even playing field with countless competitors.
[K] The most extreme example of this would be the software business, where a company can invest bottomless sums in a piece of software, but then sell it to each additional customer for practically nothing. The apparel industry isn’t that extreme—the price of making a shirt is still linked to the cost of fabric and the workers to do the stitching—but it is moving in that direction. And that helps explain why Walmart and Amazon are so eager to put a shirt on my back.
[L] Already, retailers need to figure out how to manage sophisticated supply chains connecting Southeast Asia with stores in big American cities so that they rarely run out of product. They need mobile apps and websites that offer a seamless user experience so that nothing stands between a would-be purchaser and an order. Larger companies that are good at supply chain management and technology can spread those more-or-less fixed costs around more total sales, enabling them to keep prices lower than a niche player and entrench their advantage.
[M] These positive returns to scale could become even more pronounced. Perhaps in the future, rather than manufacture a bunch of shirts in Indonesia and Malaysia and ship them to the United States to be sold one at a time to urban office workers, a company will have a robot manufacture shirts to my specifications somewhere nearby.
[N] If that’s the future of clothing, and quite a few companies are working on just that, apparel will become a landscape of high fixed costs and enormous returns to scale. The handful of companies with the very best shirt-making robots will win the market, and any company that can’t afford to develop shirt-making robots, or isn’t very good at it, might find itself left in the cold.
The price for a shirt depends on many factors, including the cost of fabric and the labor force.
选项
答案
K
解析
[K]段将服装业与软件业的相同趋势做类比,同时指出,制衣的价格与面料及制衣工人的成本相关。题干中的the labor force对应原文中的the workers to do the stitching,故选[K]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/MzBFFFFM
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Sheisnotathome.B、SheiswatchingTV.C、Sheisnotfeelingwell.D、Sheistoobusytocook.C
A、Studenttofacultyratioisbig.B、Studentsarecriticaltoprofessors.C、Goodprofessorsandsmall-scaleclasses.D、Thestude
A、Thelackofsupervisionbyboththenationalandlocalgovernments.B、Theimpactofthecurrenteconomiccrisisathomeandab
A、Topersuadethelistenerstobelievethepowerofstorytelling.B、Toemphasizetheimportanceofmoderntechnicalskills.C、To
农历腊月初八是腊八节,在这一天,人们会吃腊八粥(LabaRicePorridge)。在中国,吃腊八粥已有一千多年的历史,它起源于印度佛教。在古代,许多寺庙都会在这天做腊八粥,它以大米、果仁(nutlet)、小米(millet)等为原料。它首先被供奉给佛
长江三峡(theThreeGorges)是长江上最为壮丽的一段大峡谷,西起重庆奉节,东至湖北宜昌,全长193千米。陡峭的悬崖、危险的浅滩(shoal)和湍急的(turbulent)江水构成了三峡壮观的景象,给许多诗人和艺术家带来了创作灵感。长江三峡是中
民俗活动
小微企业(smallandmicro-sizedfirm)是小型企业、微型企业、家庭作坊式企业(familyartisanalenterprise)和个体户的统称。目前中国小微企业规模有近5000万家,在国民经济中的支撑作用越来越大。小微企业是提供
李白和杜甫被认为是唐朝最伟大的诗人。李白和杜甫有很多共同点。两个人都没有参加过科举,但是都曾经在朝廷任职,都在四川居住过,都曾经旅行。然而,他们也有不同点。杜甫更像是一个专业的儒家学者,而李白更像是道家的。杜甫写的是现实主义诗歌,而李白写的是浪漫主义诗歌。
期货保证金存管银行是由()指定,协助交易所办理期货交易结算业务的银行。
随机试题
A.来自宿主细胞c-oncB.在感染早期具有重要的调节作用C.两者皆是D.两者皆非DNA肿瘤病毒携带的癌基因
男性,40岁,慢性咳嗽咳痰史10年,突发左侧胸痛1天,呈针刺样疼痛,向左肩部放射,伴有胸闷及气短,干咳,无发热。吸烟约10年,1包/天。查体:消瘦,神志清楚,气管居中,无颈静脉怒张,左下肺叩诊鼓音,左下肺呼吸音明显降低,右肺散在少量干啰音,心界叩诊不清,心
关于儿童生长发育的说法,错误的是
[2013年第40题]下列防水材料施工环境温度可以低于5℃的是:
下列关于总平面设计中影响工程造价的主要因素描述,正确的是()。
任何单位不得以虚假的经济业务事项或者()进行核算。
成长型基金、收入型基金和平衡型基金是按照基金的()分类。
对城市建设焕然一新的追求,不仅会使城市记忆受到损坏甚至毁灭,也是对城市中人的生活情感的_________。城市中长期积淀形成的文化风格和人文环境,被当作了“过时”的东西予以_________或抛弃,城市记忆也因此没有了依托对象,公众的情感认同无法被唤起,在
若进行网络配置不后不能进入Internet服务,ping 127.0.0.1是通的,ping网关不通,给出(55)的结论是不正确的。 需要确定TCP/IP是否已经初始化,或者在NT上是否配置了重复的IP地址,要使用程序(56)关于ping的使用,其正
NajibullahZaziwasarrestedbecause
最新回复
(
0
)