首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
admin
2018-06-06
34
问题
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant groups think it offers little hope to low-skilled, mostly Hispanic would-be migrants. Right-wingers snarl that it is nothing but an "amnesty" for illegals. Companies, who it had been hoped would support the new compromise, hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers. And the left is complaining because it fears it will depress low-end wages. It would be nice to be able to report that opposition across so full a spectrum is a sign that the bill is a well-crafted compromise. In fact, it may well turn out to be doomed.
That would be a pity, because there are some good things in the proposal. Most important, it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of what to do about the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already in America, most of them working hard at low-paid and disagreeable jobs. Deporting a population the size of Ohio’s is impossible, economically illiterate and morally wrong. The new bill would make the 12 million legal, and offer them a path, though a winding one, to full citizenship.
The right doesn’t like this, of course, and points out that amnesties(which this really isn’t, given the fines and hurdles involved)have in the past drawn fresh waves of migrants. So the other side of the bargain gives conservatives everything they could wish for in terms of razor-wired fences, surveillance drones, armed border guards and a programme that will force companies to check the legality of their workers. Such measures are probably necessary to win support and rebuild trust in the immigration system. No bill would pass without them.
The bad part of the deal is what happens to would-be immigrants once all those sensors and spy-planes are in place. The bill proposes a dual system. A guest-worker programme would allow 400,000 people a year to enter the country to work for two years, after which they must go home for a year, with a six-year cap on the total time they can spend in America. The other part is a new method of granting residence permits, carrying the right to work. Such "green cards" currently go mostly to relatives of American citizens or to people sponsored by an employer. The bill would bring in a "points" system for 380,000 people a year, similar to those in use in Canada and Australia. Permits for family members would be restricted, to cover only spouses and young children. Employers would have less ability to sponsor the people they need.
There are several problems. One is that extended families help build vibrant communities in a way that guest workers don’t. Second, the government should not be in the business of telling companies whom they ought to hire. There are ways round this, such as awarding points not for specific jobs, but still the problem is that most of the green cards will be used up by Indian software designers, Bosnian engineers or the similarly blessed. America does indeed need such folk, but it also needs legions of the less-skilled, too.
That will continue to mean a large, poorly paid and constantly rotating alien underclass with little stake in American society. On May 23rd, the Senate voted to scale the guest worker programme back to 200,000. So the illegals will keep coming—except that now their journey will be still more dangerous and they will be even further beyond the law. The current bill is better than nothing: but unless it is improved, it will not solve the main problem of the illegals.
The social reaction towards the immigration reform includes the following EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、right-wingers think it simply provides more chance for illegal immigrants
B、companies hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers
C、some people fear it will depress low-end wages
D、the majority of people think that the bill is a well-crafted compromise
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/JTCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Volunteeringonpoliticalcampaignscanhelpstudentsbecomeamoreattractivecandidateforjobsingovernment.
Chinaisthetopsourcecountryofinternationalstudentsintheworld.Recentstatisticshaveshowna【C1】______trendforChine
Embracingfailureisaclicheofthebusinessworld.ButasMatthewSyed,ajournalistatTheTimes,showsinanewbook,Black
Ifthereisanyendeavorwhosefruitsshouldbefreelyavailable,thatendeavorissurelypubliclyfinancedscience.Morally,ta
InDecember,WaymoLLC,theleadingdriverlesscarcompany,broughtouttheworld’sfirstcommercialrobo-taxiservice.Butfor
Teachersofcross-culturalcoursesshouldhelpthestudentstobecome______tothetargetculture.
作为一名运动员、教练员和体育管理者,尤其是作为奥运会的技术官员,我最大的体会是:在奥运会中,没有什么比运动员的利益更重要了。我们整个奥运计划的制定是以运动员需要为中心的。//在做任何决定时,我们都要问一问自己,什么对奥运会和残奥会运动员最有利。在国际单项体
我国首次月球探测工程的成功,实现了中华民族的千年奔月梦想,开启了中国人走向深空探索宇宙奥秘的时代,标志着我国已经进入世界具有深空探测能力的国家行列。这是我国推进自主创新、建设创新型国家取得的又一标志性成果,是中华民族在攀登世界科技高峰征程上实现的又一历史性
A、Whatisthecarpetmadeof?B、Whatwasityousplit?C、Youspoiledwhatwasthere.D、Yousplititinthecar.B
A、Toensurepassengers’safety.B、Tocollectfaresfrompassengers.C、Toteachpassengershowtoridetheelephant.D、Tofeedth
随机试题
After1945,theUSgovernmentbuiltmanynewroadsandhighways.Peoplemovedfartherandfartherfromthecitieswheretheywor
对涂敷完成的3PE防腐管进行剥离强度检测,待防腐管冷却到常温即可进行测量。
2003年抗击传染性非典型肺炎的工作中,产生了哪项法律
资产评估管理机构对资产评估报告的运用体现在下列方面,不包括()。
下列有关或有事项的表述中,错误的是()。
根据船舶吨税法律制度的规定,下列各项中,免征船舶吨税的有()。
国有经济的主导地位和作用应当主要体现在()。
阅读下面文字,完成下列问题宋代学者称杜甫为“圣于诗者”,这主要是指杜甫在诗歌史上地位而言。他们把杜甫视为“集大成”者,认为他是位无体不工、无美不备的诗人。到了后世把杜甫称为“诗圣”,这突出了杜诗的道德含义(郭沫若称其为“诗中圣哲”也是此意),符合杜
Suicidehasbeenacauseofconcerninmostsocietiesforalongtime.TheclassicalGreeks,forexample,requiredpeoplewhowa
Unfortunatelysalesresultsoverthelastyearhavefailedtocomeuptoourexpectations.Anumberoffactorshavebeenrespons
最新回复
(
0
)