In the eighteenth century, Japan’s feudal overlords, from the shogun to the humblest samurai, found themselves under financial s

admin2020-08-17  16

问题     In the eighteenth century, Japan’s feudal overlords, from the shogun to the humblest samurai, found themselves under financial stress. In part, this stress can be attributed to the overlords’ failure to adjust to a rapidly expanding economy, but the stress was also due to factors beyond the overlords’ control. Concentration of the samurai in castle-towns had acted as a stimulus to trade. Commercial efficiency, in turn, had put temptations in the way of buyers. Since most samurai had been reduced to idleness by years of peace, encouraged to engage in scholarship and martial exercises or to perform administrative tasks that took little time, it is not surprising that their tastes and habits grew expensive. Overlords’ income, despite the increase in rice production among their tenant farmers, failed to keep pace with their expenses. Although shortfalls in overlords’ income resulted almost as much from laxity among their tax collectors (the nearly inevitable outcome of hereditary office-holding) as from their higher standards of living, a misfortune like a fire or flood, bringing an increase in expenses or a drop in revenue, could put a domain in debt to the city rice-brokers who handled its finances. Once in debt, neither the individual samurai nor the shogun himself found it easy to recover.
    It was difficult for individual samurai overlords to increase their income because the amount of rice that farmers could be made to pay in taxes was not unlimited, and since the income of Japan’s central government consisted in part of taxes collected by the shogun from his huge domain, the government too was constrained. Therefore, the Tokugawa shoguns began to look to other sources for revenue. Cash profits from government-owned mines were already on the decline because the most easily worked deposits of silver and gold had been exhausted, although debasement of the coinage had compensated for the loss. Opening up new farmland was a possibility, but most of what was suitable had already been exploited and further reclamation was technically unfeasible. Direct taxation of the samurai themselves would be politically dangerous. This left the shoguns only commerce as a potential source of government income.
    Most of the country’s wealth, or so it seemed, was finding its way into the hands of city merchants. It appeared reasonable that they should contribute part of that revenue to ease the shogun’s burden of financing the state. A means of obtaining such revenue was soon found by levying forced loans, known as goyo-kin; although these were not taxes in the strict sense, since they were irregular in timing and arbitrary in amount, they were high in yield. Unfortunately, they pushed up prices. Thus, regrettably, the Tokugawa shogunsl search for solvency for the government made it increasingly difficult for individual Japanese who lived on fixed stipends to make ends meet.
According to the passage, the actions of the Tokugawa shoguns in their search for solvency for the government were regrettable because those actions________.

选项 A、raised the cost of living by pushing up prices
B、resulted in the exhaustion of the most easily worked deposits of silver and gold
C、were far lower in yield than had originally been anticipated
D、did not succeed in reducing government spending

答案A

解析 事实细节题。最后一段最后一句指出了德川幕府寻求为政府偿债的结果。由Thus可知,上一句为原因,即强制征收的结果抬高了物价,提高了生活成本,A项表述符合文义,故为答案。文中未提及国有矿山资源枯竭的原因,故排除B项;第三段第三句提到,幕府通过强制贷款的方式向商人征收了很多钱款。故C项与文义不符。同时可推测,幕府未能减少开支,D项表述与原文不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/JAVUFFFM
0

最新回复(0)