Necessity can spur novelty. Even political novelty. As the need for fiscal austerity grows, an unlikely alliance has emerged bet

admin2014-09-09  35

问题     Necessity can spur novelty. Even political novelty. As the need for fiscal austerity grows, an unlikely alliance has emerged between policymakers and public advocates who have long sought criminal-justice reform. These policymakers are realizing what advocates have reiterated for years: The nation’s addiction to incarceration as a curb on crime must end. The evidence is staggering. In California, 54 prisoners may share a single toilet and 200 prisoners may live in a gymnasium supervised by two or three officers. Suicidal inmates may be held for protracted periods in cages without toilets and the wait times for mental-health care sometimes reach 12 months.
    Citing these conditions and more, the US Supreme Court ruled in May that California prisoners were deprived of adequate access to mental and medical health care in violation of the Eighth Amendment and its prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Prison overcrowding is ubiquitous: Between 1970 and 2005, the nation’s inmate population grew by 700 percent. Besides impeding access to health care, overcrowding also creates unsafe and unsanitary conditions, diverts prison resources away from education and social development, and forces low-and high-risk offenders to mingle, increasing the likelihood of recidivism.
    Expect additional lawsuits. That’s why a consortium of states submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the state of California. America’s overreliance on incarceration has also impeded the rights of criminal defendants. The Sixth Amendment guarantees legal representation to individuals charged with a crime. Yet, because of the crushing volume of cases, indigent defense programs often suffer from inadequate staffing, funding, and supervision. In Kentucky, a public defender may represent more than 450 clients in a single year. In Miami, the annual case load is nearly 500 felonies and 2,225 misdemeanors. The consequences include wrongful incarceration, wrongful convictions, and guilty pleas when meritorious defenses are available.
    Civil rights groups in Michigan and New York have already brought lawsuits seeking an overhaul of their states’ indigent defense systems. These lawsuits might be a harbinger for the future; States unfaithful to the promise of the Sixth Amendment may be forced to increase funding and restructure priorities. Protecting prisoners and criminal defendants is about recognizing that they are acutely vulnerable because they do not have access to coalitions and political networks capable of effecting change. Affording them protection is consistent with the enduring constitutional principle that political democracy alone cannot adequately protect the rights of certain groups of people. The solution?
    First, revamp habitual-offender laws, now in effect in more than 20 states, which regularly yield perverse sentences. California’s three-strikes law, for example, was passed during the paranoia that followed the searing murder of 12-year-old Polly Klaas by a longtime violent offender, and is so egregiously punitive that nonviolent petty theft may serve as a "third strike. " A new ballot initiative in California seeks to change this law.
    Second, implement misdemeanor reform by decriminalizing offenses such as feeding the homeless, dog-leash violations. Such reform is vital: Between 1972 and 2006, misdemeanor prosecutions rose from 5 million to 10. 5 million.
    Third, limit the use of pretrial detention. Nearly two-thirds of the nation’s prison population haven’t been convicted of a crime; they are awaiting trial. Many are arrested for low-risk offenses such as disturbing the peace or traffic violations, and they languish in jail because they can’t afford bail. Releasing these individuals would not jeopardize public safety and would reduce overcrowding and public defender caseloads. Last year, Kentucky terminated pre-trial detention for numerous drug offenses and mandated citations rather than arrests for certain misdemeanors.
    Fourth, impose nonprison penalties on those arrested for technical parole and probation violations like missing a meeting or court appearance. This would dramatically cut overcrowding and caseloads given that more than a third of all prison admissions are for such types of violations. Texas has significantly reduced its inmate population.
    The spirit that animates the Sixth and Eighth Amendments is human dignity. No matter the crime or harm, criminal defendants and prisoners retain a dignity. Just over 40 years ago, a group of inmates claimed they were deprived of this dignity and, in what has since become a subject of fascination in pop culture, rioted at Attica Correctional Facility in New York. The violence and its death toll serves as an ominous reminder that America must pursue criminal-justice reform if it is to honor this dignity.
Which of the following is NOT recommended by the author to reduce the overcrowding of America’s prisons?

选项 A、To abolish habitual-offender laws.
B、To reduce the use of pretrial detention.
C、To implement penalties without imprisonment.
D、To cut and limit misdemeanor prosecutions.

答案A

解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/CKCYFFFM
0

最新回复(0)