首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
99
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
According to the passage, a suitable candidate may be underestimated by the contrast effect because ______.
选项
A、the candidate has no noticeable good trait
B、the previous candidate may appears exceptionally intelligent
C、the candidate lacks self-confidence
D、the candidate leaves a bad first impression
答案
B
解析
本题是细节题。根据第4段的第2句:“A suitable candidate…exceptionally intelligent.”可以得出,如果前一位面试者非常优秀,那么后面一个面试者的能力就会被低估,这是受到对比效应的影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/9IHsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,PersonnelDirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Accordingtothepassage,theattempttoeradicatetheAIDSvirusOtherscientistsarelookingatexperimentsthataresimilar
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Hamstershavesleepingproblems.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Scientistsarecrueltodoexperimentswithhamsters.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.theidentificationoftheinternalclockmayhelptoreliev
随机试题
应激性溃疡
CO2与Hb结合生成氨基甲酰血红蛋白的反应主要受下列哪种因素的调节
患者男性,40岁。囚创伤致心跳呼吸停止,经复苏后心跳呼吸恢复,继而出现体温升高、抽搐、惊厥。为防治以上并发症,应首选
A.高铁血红蛋白症B.氰化物中毒C.有机磷中毒D.强心苷中毒E.砷中毒苯妥英钠可治疗
哪项不是影响全冠固位的因素
急性阑尾炎最严重的病理类型是
甲因走私武器被判处15年有期徒刑,剥夺政治权利5年;因组织他人偷越国境被判处14年有期徒刑,并处没收财产5万元,剥夺政治权利3年;因骗取出口退税被判处10年有期徒刑,并处罚金20万元。关于数罪并罚,下列选项符合《刑法》规定的是
有如下程序:#includeusingnamespacestd;classGrandChild{public::GrandChild(){strcpy(name,"Unknown");}co
下面对“对象”概念描述正确的是()。
ImmanuelKantneverleftthetownofhisbirthandAtaughtattheuniversityBofthere,wherehebecameprofessorCoflogicand
最新回复
(
0
)