首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
93
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
According to the passage, a suitable candidate may be underestimated by the contrast effect because ______.
选项
A、the candidate has no noticeable good trait
B、the previous candidate may appears exceptionally intelligent
C、the candidate lacks self-confidence
D、the candidate leaves a bad first impression
答案
B
解析
本题是细节题。根据第4段的第2句:“A suitable candidate…exceptionally intelligent.”可以得出,如果前一位面试者非常优秀,那么后面一个面试者的能力就会被低估,这是受到对比效应的影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/9IHsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,personneldirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Togenerateinterestinitsbusinessgifts,ABCcompanytakesanadintheJulyissueofPersonnelInternational,invitingreade
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Mr.Cousinsgotsickafterreturningfrom______.Whatdidn’tMr.Cousinsdoinhisexperimentswithlaughter?
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Hamstershavesleepingproblems.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Biologicalclocktellstime.
随机试题
Flash文档的扩展名为
A.奇脉B.交替脉C.水冲脉D.短绌脉提示心包填塞
某患者,47岁。因牙周病失牙。计算DM-FT时,按照世界卫生组织的记录方法,其M即失牙数为
项目工作大纲是指导项目工作的纲领性文件,主要内容包括()。
文件型病毒通常容易感染扩展名为()的文件。
2014年3月11日,甲公司签发一张商业汇票,收款人为乙公司,到期日为2014年9月11日,甲公司的开户银行P银行为该汇票承兑。2014年6月30日,乙公司从丙公司采购一批货物,将该汇票背书转让给丙公司,丙公司9月30日持该汇票到其开户银行Q银行
土地增值税纳税人应在签订房地产转让合同7日内,到()税务机关办理纳税申报。
大气和云层既可以折射也可以吸收部分太阳光,约有一半照射地球的太阳能被地球表面的土地和水面吸收,这一热能值十分巨大。由此可以得出:地球将会逐渐升温以致融化。然而,幸亏有一个可以抵消此作用的因素,即__________。填入划横线部分最恰当的一句是:
下面属于整数类I实例的是
Mikejustdiscoveredthathispassporthad______threemonthsago.
最新回复
(
0
)