In a provocative research paper from a couple of years ago, economist Robert Gordon of North-western University in the USA asked

admin2023-02-22  46

问题         In a provocative research paper from a couple of years ago, economist Robert Gordon of North-western University in the USA asked if economic growth has essentially come to an end. He wondered if the rapid economic and technological growth of the past few centuries might turn out to have been only a temporary thing.  Growth of this kind, he noted,  is certainly not the norm for human history.【B6】________________
    We stand today at the trailing edge of this explosion, and most people expect it to continue,  and perhaps even accelerate,  propelling us endlessly into a future that we can barely imagine.
    An alternative possibility, Gordon suggested, is that the past two hundred years reflected our intellectual expansion into an open domain of relatively easy discoveries.【B7】_______________
    Indeed, some evidence suggests that technological advance has slowed down, at least in certain areas. As of 1800, the fastest travel came by way of the horse; it then advanced to the steam train and motorcar, and still later to the airplane and jet aircraft, ultimately reaching speeds of 500 mph in the mid-1950s. Today, speed of travel remains stuck just where it was back then, and has even dropped due to the need to conserve fuel.
    【B8】____________________
    A team of scientists has recently done this using patent data over more than 200 years, and their analysis suggests that there is something real to the notion that innovation is slowing. The discovery of completely new technologies does seem to be increasingly less frequent.
    They find that the resulting record of patents and codes reveals some interesting trends.
    【B9】_____________________
    As time passes, in other words, it seems that single-technology inventions have become less common, whereas combinatorial invention has become the norm. For the past century at least, we’ve been making inventions faster than new technologies.
    The shift to combinatorial innovation also shows up in the comparative growth of the total number of patents, distinct codes and combinations of codes through time. Starting in 1790, all three grew exponentially for the first 80 years, during a period when most new inventions involved a new technology. Things changed abruptly around 1870, when growth in the number of distinct technology codes slowed, falling behind the number of patents and new combinations.
    【B10】___________________
    Since 1870 the process of invention has been driven almost entirely by combining existing technologies.
    [A]   We may have already tamed the most basic technologies—chemistry, sanitation, light, electronics and so on—and may face greater difficulties in making new discoveries with comparable impact on hu-man well-being.
    [B]  All in all, this analysis shows that the introduction of new technologies—currently, and also for quite a while in the recent past—plays a maximal role in fuelling invention.
    [C]   In other words, the nature of invention changed—people slowed in their invention of new technologies, but turned out new inventions just as quickly as before by putting old technologies together in new ways.
    [D]  In the nineteenth century, for example, nearly half of all patents were single-code inventions, meaning that inventors achieved their useful ends by exploiting a single, new technology. This proportion steadily decreased over the twentieth century, and currently stands at about 12%.
    [E]  In this combinatorial era, invention seems to have conformed to a fairly regular law reflecting a balance between exploitation of existing ideas and exploration for new ones.
    [F]   Before about 1700, humans had lived in pretty much the same way for many thousands of years. Then, abruptly, the transformation of the industrial revolution arrived, bringing waves of change through science and technology.
    [G]  This is all speculation, of course, as no one can truly see into the future. But it is possible to look back at data about the history of technologies, and of the inventions to which they gave rise, and to chart the pace of innovation over time.
【B6】

选项

答案F

解析 第一段开头讲经济学家罗伯特.戈登怀疑经济和科技的快速增长只是短暂的现象。空格前罗伯特.戈登指出这种飞速发展在人类历史上并非常态(not the norm)。空格后说现今我们在这一发展的最后阶段(the trailing edge of...),this explosion说明空格处会谈到某种事物的爆发和扩张。F提到工业革命之前和之后这两个时期人类生活和科技发展的情况:在1700年之前长达几千年来人类的生活方式几乎没有任何改变,但1700年后工业革命突然带来了几百年间的变革潮流,促使科技飞速发展。这一现实情况和空格前提到的科技飞速发展并非人类发展史的常态相符。此外,空格后提到的this explosion也能F中找到所指,即工业革命带来的科技变革浪潮(waves of ...technology),故选F。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/3U1iFFFM
0

最新回复(0)