A、They are too light to be steady. B、They have cut off some users’ toes. C、They are easily broken in use. D、They endanger junior

admin2017-12-08  31

问题  
An Australian furniture company is recalling one of its popular dining chairs after claims [5]its design has made people lose parts of their toes. Two people have separately told Australian media they cut off a toe after catching it inside the chair leg. Fantastic Furniture said it was recalling their chair because the design of such metal chair may cause a hazard.
    This weekend, Australia’s media reported that an 11-year-old boy had to have reconstructive surgery—but still lost the end of his toe—after catching it on a chair in October. His mother posted a warning on Facebook saying the "super dangerous" chair had cut his toe off clean.
    A Sydney man said in October that his middle toe was sliced off after he caught it on the chair’s leg while chasing his young son. He is seeking compensation. Fantastic Furniture said customers could either return the chairs—which were on sale for A$39—or take free insert plugs which could be inserted inside the chair legs to make them safe.
5 Why did Fantastic Furniture call back its chairs?
6 What do we learn about the 11-year-old boy?
7 How did Fantastic Furniture react to the accidents?

选项 A、They are too light to be steady.
B、They have cut off some users’ toes.
C、They are easily broken in use.
D、They endanger junior children.

答案B

解析 题目询问家具公司召回椅子的原因。新闻开头提到,椅子的设计缺陷造成一些用户的脚趾被削掉(made people lose parts of their toes),故B“有些用户的脚趾被削掉”正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/xGUFFFFM
0

最新回复(0)