首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
No one in fashion is surprised that Burberry burnt £28 million of stock A) Last week, Burberry’s annual report revealed that
No one in fashion is surprised that Burberry burnt £28 million of stock A) Last week, Burberry’s annual report revealed that
admin
2022-03-24
65
问题
No one in fashion is surprised that Burberry burnt £28 million of stock
A) Last week, Burberry’s annual report revealed that £28.6 million worth of stock was burnt last year. The news has left investors and consumers outraged but comes as little surprise to those in the fashion industry.
B) The practice of destroying unsold stock, and even rolls of unused fabric, is commonplace for luxury labels. Becoming too widely available at a cheaper price through discount stores discourages full-price sales. Sending products for recycling leaves them vulnerable to being stolen and sold on the black market. Jasmine Bina, CEO of brand strategy agency Concept Bureau explains, "Typically, luxury brands rally around exclusivity to protect their business interests, namely intellectual property and preservation of brand equity (资产)." She stated she had heard rumors of stock burning but not specific cases until this week.
C) Another reason for the commonplace practice is a financial incentive for brands exporting goods to America. United States Customs states that if imported merchandise is unused and destroyed under their supervision, 99% of the duties, taxes or fees paid on the merchandise may be recovered. It is incredibly difficult to calculate how much dead stock currently goes to waste. While there are incentives to do it, there’s no legal obligation to report it.
D) A source, who chose to remain anonymous, shared her experience working in a Burberry store in New York in October 2016. "My job was to toss items in boxes so they could be sent to be burned. It was killing me inside because all that leather and fur went to waste and animals had died for nothing. I couldn’t stay there any longer, their business practices threw me off the roof." In May this year, Burberry announced it was taking fur out of its catwalk shows and reviewing its use elsewhere in the business. "Even though we asked the management, they refused to give us detailed answers as to why they would do this with their collection," continued the source, who left her role within two weeks. She has since worked with another high-profile, luxury label.
E) In an online forum post, which asked if it’s true that Louis Vuitton burns its bags, Ahmed Bouchfaa, who claimed to work for Louis Vuitton, responded that the brand holds sales of old stock for staff members twice a year. Items which have still not sold after several sales are destroyed. "Louis Vuitton doesn’t have public sales. They either sell a product at a given price or discontinue it. This is to make sure that everybody pays the same price for an item," he says. He goes on to disclose the strict guidelines around the employee sales: "You may buy gifts for someone, but they track each item, and if your gift ends up online they know who to ask." One investor commenting on the Burberry figures was reportedly outraged that the unsold goods were not even offered to investors before they were destroyed.
F) Richemont, who owns several luxury brands, hit the headlines in May for taking back £437 million of watches for destruction in the last two years to avoid marked-down prices. It’s not just luxury brands either. In October last year, a Danish TV show exposed H&M for burning 12 tonnes of unsold clothing since 2013. In a statement, the high street retailer defended itself by saying that the burnt clothing had failed safety tests: "The products to which the media are referring have been tested in external laboratories. The test results show that one of the products is mold infested and the other product contains levels of lead that are too high. Those products have rightly been stopped in accordance with our safety routines." In March, a report revealed that H&M were struggling with $4.3 billion worth of unsold stock. The brand told The New York Times that the plan was to reduce prices to move the stock, arguably encouraging consumers to buy and throw away with little thought.
G) Over-production is perhaps the biggest concern for Burberry. While there has been much outrage at the elitist connotation of burning goods rather than making them affordable, executives at the British fashion house are no doubt struggling to defend how they miscalculated production. The waste has been put down to burning old cosmetic stock to make way for their new beauty range. However, while the value of destroyed stock is up from £26.9 million last year, it’s an even more significant increase from 2016’s figure of £18.8 million, highlighting that this is an ongoing issue.
H) In September 2016, Burberry switched to a "see now, buy now" catwalk show format. The move was a switch to leverage on the coverage of their fashion week show to make stock available immediately to consumers. This is opposed to the traditional format of presenting to the industry, taking orders for production and becoming available in six months’ time. While Burberry announced "record-breaking" online reach and engagement, there has been little evidence to suggest that the strategy has had a significant effect on sales, particularly as the hype (炒作) slows across the season. In February they made adjustments to the format, dropping some catwalk items immediately and promising that others would launch in the coming months.
I) In a statement, Burberry denied that switching to "see now, buy now" has had an impact on waste. A Burberry spokesperson further said, "On the occasions when disposal of products is necessary, we do so in a responsible manner. We are always seeking ways to reduce and revalue our waste. This is a core part of our strategy and we have forged partnerships and committed support to innovative organizations to help reach this goal."
J) One such partnership is with Elvis & Kresse, an accessories brand working with reclaimed materials. Co-founder Kresse Wesling said, "Late last year we launched an ambitious five-year partnership with the Burberry Foundation. The main aim of this is to scale our leather rescue project, starting with off-cuts from the production of Burberry leather goods. We are working tirelessly to expand our solutions and would love to welcome anyone to our workshop to come and see what we are doing." At the moment, the partnership only addresses waste at the production stage and not unsold goods.
K) While these are honorable schemes, it makes it harder for Burberry to defend these latest figures. Fifteen years ago, Burberry was at crisis point as their signature check pattern was widely imitated by cheap, imitation brands. It deterred luxury consumers who found their expensive clothing more closely associated with working-class youth culture than a prestigious heritage fashion house. In the year 2004, at the height of over-exposure of the Burberry check, the brand’s turnover was £715.5 million. Under Christopher Bailey as creative director they turned the brand around and this past year revenue hit £2.73 billion. L) Bina believes that brands need to readdress their exclusivity tactic. "Exclusivity is starting to be challenged," she says. "I think that goes hand in hand with how luxury itself is being challenged. Access to fashion, and the brands who police it, are becoming less and less relevant. Things like health, enlightenment, and social and environmental responsibility are the new luxuries. These all come from within, not without. That’s the challenge that traditional luxury brands will have to contend with in the mid- to long-term future."
Staff members of a luxury brand may buy its old stock at cheaper prices, but they are not allowed to resell them.
选项
答案
E
解析
注意抓住题干中的关键信息Staff members和buy its old stock at cheaper prices。文章段落中论及奢侈品牌员工可以以特价购买旧存货的内容出现在E段。该段首句指出,一名自称在路易威登工作的员工称,该品牌每年为员工举行两次旧库存特价销售活动。随后在该段第六句进一步说。他还披露了有关这种特价销售的严格准则:“你可以买给某人作为礼物,但他们会跟踪每件商品,如果你购买的礼物最终在网上销售,他们知道该对谁进行问责。”可见,题干是对原文的同义转述。题干中的Staff members of a luxury brand may buy its old stock at cheaper prices对应原文中的the brand holds sales of old stock for staff members;题干中的are not allowed to resell them对应原文中的they track each item,and if your gift ends up online they know who to ask。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/uAaFFFFM
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Thereallyneedystudentscan’tgetitandhavetodropout.B、Negotiationsleaveschoolslittleroomforimprovement.C、Stude
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteanessaycommentingontheproverb"Hewhomakesnomistakesmakesnothing,
HowPovertyChangestheBrainA)Yousawthepicturesinscienceclass—aprofileviewofthehumanbrain,sectionedbyf
Makingchoicesishard.ThatwouldbewhyresearcherMoranCerfhaseliminateditfromhislife.Asarule,healwayschoosesth
Waffles?Frenchtoast?Bacon?Bigbreakfastsmaybeathingofthepast.AccordingtotheAssociatedPress,moreAmericansarec
在大家庭(extendedfamily)里,老一辈人的意见受到尊重,小一辈的人得到全家的爱护。中国宪法(constitution)规定赡养父母是成年子女义不容辞的责任。在城市里,不和家里老人一起住的年轻夫妇给老人生活费(livingexpenses
春运(SpringFestivaltravelrush)是指中国春节前后一段时间里出现的一种高负荷交通运输的现象。春运一般从春节前15天开始,持续约40天。对大多数中国人来说,在春节期间与家人团聚是一个悠久的传统。人们从工作、读书的地方回到家里,
A、Handlingcustomercomplaints.B、Recruitingandtrainingnewstaff.C、Dispatchingorderedgoodsontime.D、Developingcomputer
A、Heisnotfollowingthecompleterecipe.B、Heismissingtherightpantocookthepizza.C、Heisusingthedirectionsforad
A、Doubtful.B、Supportive.C、Indifferent.D、Objective.A
随机试题
此所谓藉寇兵而赍盗粮者也。兵:
关于视杆细胞和视锥细胞的叙述哪项不正确
李某拥有一处地段不错的商铺,王某欲承租,2006年2月15日双方签订了租赁协议,约定2006年3月1日起租用。同年2月20日李某又与张某签订了租赁协议,并当日将该商铺交付给了张某。对此,下列说法中正确的是()。
账务处理系统中,填制记账凭证时应同时输入总账科目和明细科目。()
现代企业制度的基本特征包括()。
Whyareyouoftenlateforwork______youlivenotfarfromthecompany?
公民甲(19周岁)与公民乙(15周岁)因口角发生斗殴。公安民警对此依法进行了治安调解。问题:如公安民警欲进行现场调解,则需满足什么条件?
结构化程序设计的基本原则不包括
Aweathermapisanimportanttoolforgeographers.Asuccessionofthreeoffourmapspresentsacontinuouspictureofweather
LandfillsYouhavejustfinishedyourmealatafastfoodrestaurantandyouthrowyouruneatenfood,foodwrappers,drinkc
最新回复
(
0
)