首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom says that it is better to be a large company than a small one when credit is tight. Bigger firms have more r
Conventional wisdom says that it is better to be a large company than a small one when credit is tight. Bigger firms have more r
admin
2011-04-04
22
问题
Conventional wisdom says that it is better to be a large company than a small one when credit is tight. Bigger firms have more room for maneuver (机动): They have access to more types of funding, they have more fat to cut, and they have greater bargaining power with lenders. Even so, life is getting ever more uncomfortable for the bigger beasts of the corporate jungle.
According to the Federal Reserve’s most recent lending survey, American banks are tightening terms more aggressively for bigger firms than for smaller ones. Lenders are more cautious than they have been at least since 1990. The story among European banks is similar. Lenders in emerging markets can be more suspicious of multinational firms than they are of locals. "We just don’t know what they’ve got on their balance-sheets back home," says one bank boss in Africa.
Violent movements in exchange rates are causing additional headaches, says Andrew Balfour of Slaughter & May, a law firm. Calculations of financial ratios can be thrown out by wild currency movements, potentially triggering breaches of loan agreements. Companies with sterlingdenominated (以英镑为单位的) credit lines may find that their facilities are not big enough as a result of the pound’s recent sharp fall, for instance.
It is not panic stations yet. Most firms can survive for a while with the credit tap turned off. Analysis by Moody’s, a rating agency, shows that the vast majority of highly rated companies in America and Europe have enough headroom, in the form of cash and undrawn bank facilities, to be able to survive for 12 months without needing new financing. European corporate-debt markets have seen a rare flurry (骤雨) of issues in the past few days by opportunistic, highly rated firms.
Governments are also working hard to hold out credit markets. The Fed’s program to buy commercial paper, a form of short-term company debt, had acquired almost $300 billion by November 26th. Banks on both sides of the Atlantic are issuing lots of government-backed bonds, which should encourage lending.
European lenders are more ______ when they deal with bigger firms.
选项
答案
cautious
解析
根据题干中的European lenders将本题出处定位在第二段第三句。原文说“欧洲银行的情况也是相似的”。也就是前面两句中提到的“贷款条款更加严格,态度更加谨慎(cautious)”。题干要求填入的是一个形容词,表示银行在与大公司打交道时的态度,由此可知答案为cautious。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/s9TFFFFM
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、ThatGhanaiantomatoestastebetterthanBritishones.B、ThatBritishtomatoesarehealthierthanGhanaianones.C、Thatprotec
SuggestionsforYourWorkAnnieisalongtimesecretary/receptionistfortwoseniorvicepresidentsatabigcompany.Theyh
SuggestionsforYourWorkAnnieisalongtimesecretary/receptionistfortwoseniorvicepresidentsatabigcompany.Theyh
A、Thecompanywillcompensatethecustomer.B、Thecompanywillrefundthecustomer’smoney.C、Thecompanywillreplaceit.D、The
Virtuallyallconsumerswillhaveacreditcardintheirlives.Selectingacreditcardshouldnotbesomethingtakenlightly,c
Virtuallyallconsumerswillhaveacreditcardintheirlives.Selectingacreditcardshouldnotbesomethingtakenlightly,c
A、Hewillchooseanewtopictowritetheessay.B、HewillchoosethenovelwrittenbyShakespeareasthetopic.C、Herefusesto
RecentlyasociologistfromtheUniversityofNewHampshire,MurrayStraus,presentedapapersuggestingthatcorporalpunishmen
A、Sheisexpectingherturn.B、Shehasfoundvaluableinformation.C、Sheneedsanotherweektoprepare.D、Shehasnetpreparedy
随机试题
A.扁桃体切除B.免疫调节剂C.抗生素+抗病毒药D.纤维支气管镜局部灌洗治疗E.肺叶切除以下情况,应采取哪项治疗女,5岁,反复咳嗽、咳脓痰,肺CT示右中叶囊状支气管扩张
骨软骨瘤多见于
下列关于构成组织结构三要素的描述中,不正确的是()
载脂蛋白的主要功能,错误的是
预备支托窝的方法错误的是
A.输血B.强的松C.睾丸酮D.切脾E.输注血小板重型再生障碍性贫血的首选治疗手段
建设单位甲与供货商乙签订了一份钢材供货合同,合同中约定:由供货商送货至施工现场,但未约定运费的负担,后双方对此没有达成补充协议,也不能依其他方法确定。则供货商将钢材送到工地后,该运输费应由()。
某国有企业甲企业有关事项如下:(1)甲企业单独设置了内审部门,但内审人员王某没有取得会计从业资格证书。(2)会计人员李某负责收入账目的登记工作,同时负责会计档案的保管。(3)该企业业务收支活动以美元为主,采用美元作为记账本位币
关于优先权,下列哪些说法是错误的?
李某在某特区打工时被机器轧断手臂,就赔偿问题与企业发生争议起诉至法院。根据该特区依据全国人大授权制定的地方性法规,李某只能得到20个月工资的赔偿额,而根据该特区所在省的地方性法规,他可以得到25个月的赔偿额。法院应如何处理本案?()
最新回复
(
0
)