首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying arra
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying arra
admin
2023-01-17
41
问题
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying array of companies that barely existed five years ago: Twitter, Linkedln, Groupon, Yammer—and the list goes on. These companies are mostly private, but have attracted the ardent attention of Wall Street and investors, with Facebook now worth purportedly US$75 billion and Groupon valued at close to US$25 billion.
There can be little doubt that these companies enrich their founders as well as some investors. But do they add anything to overall economic activity? While jobs in social media are growing fast, there were only about 21,000 listings last spring, a tiny fraction of the 150 million-member U.S. workforce. So do social-media tools enhance productivity or help us bridge the wealth divide? Or are they simply entertaining socially, and diverting us when it comes to national economic health?
The answers are vital, because billions of dollars in investment capital are being spent on these ventures, and if we are to have a productive future economy, that capital needs to grow the economic pie—and not just among the elite of Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
The problem is that these tools are so new that it is extremely difficult to answer the questions definitively. Flash back nearly 20 years and the same question was being asked about the first Internet wave. Were Netscape and the Web enhancing our economy, or were people just spending more time at work checking out ESPN.com? Official statistics weren’t designed to capture the benefits, and didn’t capture them until statistics experts at the Federal Reserve, urged on by Alan Greenspan, refined the way they measured productivity. As a result of these somewhat controversial innovations, the late 1990s became a period of substantial technology-driven gains.
It is possible that
the same gap
exists today, that social-media tools are indeed laying the groundwork for new industries and jobs, but aren’t yet registering on the statistical radar. Many companies believe social media make them more competitive. Ford and Zappos, for instance, use Twitter to market their products and address consumer complaints.
One big question is what proportion of that benefit will be captured economically by consumers vs. corporations. Sure, social media allow people to compare prices and quality and assess which companies are good to work for and where jobs might be. They also may enhance education and idea sharing, but the caveat is that the people who use these tools are the ones with higher education and income to spend on technology, not the tens of millions whose position in today’s world has eroded so sharply. According to a recent Pew Foundation study, only 45 percent of adults making less than
US$30,000 have access to broadband, which is an essential component of using content-rich social media effectively. And that is the rub. Like so many things these days, social media contribute to economic bifurcation. Dynamic companies are benefiting from these tools, even if the gains are tough to nail down in specific figures. Many individuals are benefiting too, using Linkedln to find jobs and Groupon to find deals. But now, the irony is that social media widen the social divide, making it even harder for the have-nots to navigate. They allow those with jobs to do them more effectively and companies that are profiting to profit more. But so far, they have done little to aid those who are being left behind. They are, in short, business as usual.
Which of the following titles is proper for the passage?
选项
A、Can Social Media Help the Economy?
B、Do Social Media Benefit Most Big Companies?
C、Do Social Media Tools Influence Cultural Values?
D、Who Could Become the Next Twitter?
答案
A
解析
本题要求为文章拟定标题。文章第2段便直接就社交媒体对社会经济发展的影响抛出了几个问题,而后几个段落分别探讨了社交媒体的现状、已显现的经济上的好处和问题,以及未来可能会对经济产生的影响等几个方面,均是围绕着经济方面展开,因此A项“社交媒体是否能帮助经济发展”,可作为文章标题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/rEQiFFFM
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
[A]Whattodoasastudent?[B]Variousdefinitionsofplagiarism[C]Ideasshouldalwaysbesourced[D]Ignorance
Happypeopleworkdifferently.They’remoreproductive,morecreative,andwillingtotakegreaterrisks.Andnewresearchsugge
Amtrak—thelargestrailwaycompanyintheU.S.—wasexperiencingadeclininginridership.【C1】________majorconcernstoAmtraka
Peekthroughtheinspectionwindowsofthenearly100three-dimensional(3D)printersquietlymakingthingsatRedEye,acompany
Theworldisonthetopofastaggeringriseinthenumberofoldpeople,andtheywilllivelongerthaneverbefore.【C1】_______
A)Downloadsoftelevisionprogramsandfilmsfromwebsitesareexpectedtogrowtenfoldtobeworth$6.3bnin2012,althoughso
大学で勉強する気がないのなら、大学を受験して________ところで、何ら意味はない。
规劝乃是朋友中间应有之义,但是谈何容易。名利场中,沆瀣一气,自己都难以明辨是非,哪有余力规劝别人?而在对方则又良药苦口忠言逆耳,谁又愿意让人批评他的逆鳞?规劝不可当着第三者的面行之,以免伤他的颜面,不可在他情绪不宁时行之,以免逢彼之怒。孔子说:“忠告则善道
接读朋友的来信,尤其是远自海外犹带着异国风情的航空信件,如果无须回信的话,确是人生一大快事。回信,是读信之乐的一大代价。久不回信,屡不回信,接信之乐必然就相对减少,以至于无,这时友情便暂告中断了,直到有一天在赎罪的心情下,你毅然回起信来。蹉跎了这么久,接信
随机试题
WWW——WorldWideWeb。()
在严重损伤引起的系统或器官功能障碍中,最先累及的是
小儿生理特点中所说的“稚阴稚阳”的含义是
不属于牙急性损伤范畴的是
甘草主含
下列关于假释的说法正确的是()。
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》GB50584—2013规定,有关保温、隔热工程量计算,说法正确的是()。【2014年真题】
阅读以下说明,回答以下问题,将解答填入答题纸对应的解答栏内。【说明】某单位网络拓扑结构如下图所示,该单位.Rotlter以太网接口E0接内部交换机S1,S0接口连接到电信ISP的路由器;交换机S1连接内部的Web服务器、DHCP服务器、
Laughterisnotthesameashumor.Laughteristhephysiologicalresponsetohumor.Laughterconsistswithtwoparts—asetofge
A、Theyareunimportantandshouldbedisregarded.B、Theymaygiveushelpfulcluesaboutourselves.C、Onlyatrainedpsychologis
最新回复
(
0
)