2. 考研
  3. In his new book, Going Solo, New York University sociologist Eric Klinenberg argues that we’re poised to become a nation dominat

In his new book, Going Solo, New York University sociologist Eric Klinenberg argues that we’re poised to become a nation dominat

admin2013-06-26  34
问题     In his new book, Going Solo, New York University sociologist Eric Klinenberg argues that we’re poised to become a nation dominated by single people. Just 51 percent of American adults are married, according to recent census data, and more than a quarter of all U. S. households consist of only one person. Yet singles often don’t get a lot of love—and we’re not talking about their romantic lives.
    Activists say that unmarried people are systematically discriminated against. " Singleism— stereotyping, stigmatizing, and discrimination against people who are single—is largely unrecognized and unchallenged," says activist Bella DePaulo, the author of Singled Out.
    DePaulo says: "People don’t notice singleism, and if their attention is called to it, they think there’s nothing wrong. " That’s why, for instance, car and health insurance companies get away with charging less for couples and families. "They can attract more business that way," DePaulo notes. In the process, they leave single people to essentially subsidize the benefit by paying more. " When married workers can add spouses to a health-care plan at a discount and single workers can’t add someone important to them, that’s discrimination," says DePaulo.
    The U. S. government not only turns a blind eye to the problem of "singleism," but helps enforce it, activists say. Just look at Social Security. " A childless singleton can work side by side with a childless married person, doing the same job, for the same number of years, at the same level of accomplishment—and when the married person dies, that worker can leave his or her Social Security benefits to a spouse," says DePaulo. "The single person’s benefits go back into the system. "
    That’s especially true given how much they contribute to society—more, activists argue, than married couples with families. " On average, singles have more disposable income," Klinenberg says. "They’ re fueling urban economies that would be in much worse shape without them. And compared to married people, they’re more likely to spend time with neighbors, to participate in public events, and to volunteer. "
    Singles may also be contributing more at the office, without being compensated for it, activists say. " Studies have shown that singles are often paid less than married people, even if they share the same title, responsibilities, and years of experience," says Langburt. " And if you agree that time equals dollars, then it doesn’t stop there: there’s maternity leave, all the time off leading up to the pregnancy for doctors’ visits, and sick days. "
    Historically, governments have passed laws encouraging marriage and families in the hopes that doing so would decrease the likelihood that the state would need to care for abandoned children. But policies that benefit the married shouldn’t be substitutes for more universal social programs, says marriage historian Stephanie Coontz, the director of research and public education for the Council on Contemporary Families. "The penalties for being single in this country are worse than in Europe, where individuals have guaranteed access to health care, and they have options beyond a spouse’s death benefits for staying above the poverty line as they age. "
It can be known from the last paragraph that the European countries______.
选项 A、have abandoned the preferential policies for the married people
B、have seen to that the single people can pass their social security to people important to them after they die
C、have done a good job in enhancing the universal welfare for the whole society
D、have prohibited all forms of implicit or explicit prejudice against the single by strict order
答案C
解析 作者在最后一段论述的观点比较难理解，他并不是在呼吁政府或者企业为单身主义者提供单独的福利，而是呼吁在整体上提升社会的福利保障体系。为了说明这个情况，作者举了欧洲的例子，在美国，单身者的遭遇比欧洲的单身者要悲惨。最难理解的是这样一句话，“The penalties for being single in this country are worse than in Europe，where individuals have guaranteed access to health care，and they have options beyond a spouse’s death benefits for staying above the poverty line as they age．”“欧洲人享受健全的社会保健制度。即便是单身，他们也能够老有所养，不至于要靠配偶去世后的死亡抚恤金来保证不陷入穷困潦倒的境地。”很多人会觉得这段话很费解，其实联系上下文，也很好理解。因为上文提到，很多单身主义者去世之后，他们的社会保险就被重新打回整个社会系统中；而已婚人士则可以交由配偶使用。这当然是对单身者的歧视，但是如果整个社会福利能够提升，也没有多少人会在乎配偶的保险金了。因此，作者这里强调的不是社会福利金在死后如何安置的问题，而是讨论整体的社会福利需要提升的问题。[B]选项错误，[C]选项为正确答案。[A]和[D]两个选项都涉及欧洲对单身人士歧视方面的问题，但是文中并没有讨论这个问题，因此我们也无法作出判断。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/nssRFFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)