首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the horizons of scientific knowledge.
According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the horizons of scientific knowledge.
admin
2010-07-06
38
问题
According to the new school of scientists, technology is an overlooked force in expanding the horizons of scientific knowledge. Science moves forward , they say, not so much through the insights of great men of genius as because of more ordinary things like improved techniques and tools. In short, a leader of the new school contends , the scientific revolution, as we call it, was largely the improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments that expanded the reach of science in innumerable direction.
Over the years, tools and technology themselves as a source of fundamental innovation have largely been ignored by historians and philosophers of science. The modern school that hails technology argues that such masters as Galileo, Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, and inventors such as Edison attached great importance to, and derived great benefit from, craft information and technological devices of different kinds that were usable in scientific experiments.
The centerpiece of the argument of a technology-yes, genius-no advocate was an analysis of Galileo’s role at the start of the scientific revolution. The wisdom of the day was derived from Ptolemy, an astronomer of the second century, whose elaborate system of the sky put Earth at the center of all heavenly motions. Galileo’s greatest glory was that in 1609 he was the first person to turn the newly invented telescope on the heavens to prove that the planets revolve around the sun rather than around the earth. But the real hero of the story, according to the new school of scientists, was the long evolution in the improvement of machinery for making eyeglasses.
Federal policy is necessarily involved in the technology vs. genius dispute. Whether the Government should increase the financing of pure science at the expense of technology or vice versa often depends on the issue of which is seen as the driving force.
Over the years, tools and technology themselves as a source of fundamental innovation have largely been ignored by historians and philosophers of science.
选项
答案
工具和技术本身作为根本性创新的源泉多年来在很大程度上被历史学家和科学思想家们忽视了。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/nGisFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
AccordingtoCasey,whatdodesignersoftenforgetindesigningasystemoraproduct?
HowdoesSerkis’versiondifferfromtheoriginalone?
DaffodilsbloomandchocolateeggsmeltasthelongEasterweekenddrawsnear.Alongsidesuchpleasuresisanother,equallyseas
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Agingbabyboomersaredeterminedtofighttheagingprocess.Theyspendmillionsofdollarsayearon【C1】________theyperceive
Agingbabyboomersaredeterminedtofighttheagingprocess.Theyspendmillionsofdollarsayearon【C1】________theyperceive
HowdoesAusubelfeelaboutthescientificprogressmadeeveryday?
A=WashingtonD.C.B=NewYorkCityC=ChicagoD=LosAngelesWhichcity….istheheadquarteroftheSupremeCourt
A=WashingtonD.C.B=NewYorkCityC=ChicagoD=LosAngelesWhichcity….istheheadquarteroftheSupremeCourt
随机试题
简述总分类账和明细分类账的关系。
患者,男,40岁。持续性脐周痛,阵发性加剧,肛门停止排便排气2日,伴有呕吐,呕吐物为食物。查体:一般情况良好,体温37.5℃,脉搏84次/分,血压120/80mmHg,腹部轻度膨隆,未见肠型,右下腹麦氏切口皮肤瘢痕愈合好,肠鸣音亢进,偶闻气过水声,腹部无明
早期诊断化脓性关节炎,最有确诊价值的检查是
案例某年7月31日15时45分,在Q省G市某城市给水管网改造工程管沟土方施工时,发生沟壁土方坍塌,造成3人死亡,1人重伤,1人轻伤,直接经济损失40余万元。事故发生过程:Q省G市某城市给水管网改造工程,系市政建设工程。由市自来
由于施工现场处于人口密集区,则下面说法正确的是()。关于粉尘四处弥漫的情形,下面说法正确的是()。
关于地下防水混凝土所用材料及配合比的说法,正确的有()。
如果你被录用,在新的岗位上,你将如何开展工作?
A.theissuingbankwillsendtheL/Ctooneofitscorrespondentsattheplaceofexportbymailorcable.B.I’dliketoknow
我国的根本政治制度是()(2001年单选理科卷)
Youshouldspendabout20minutesonQuestions14-26,whicharebasedonReadingPassage2below.HowWellDoWeConcentrate?A
最新回复
(
0
)