首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Getting into the Ivies [A] Ask just about any high school senior or junior — or their parents — and they’ll tell you that gettin
Getting into the Ivies [A] Ask just about any high school senior or junior — or their parents — and they’ll tell you that gettin
admin
2015-03-28
24
问题
Getting into the Ivies
[A] Ask just about any high school senior or junior — or their parents — and they’ll tell you that getting into a selective college is harder than it used to be. They’re right about that. But the reasons for the newfound difficulty are not well understood.
[B] Population growth plays a role, but the number of teenagers is not too much higher than it was 30 years ago, when the youngest baby boomers were still applying to college. And while many more Americans attend college than in the past, most of the growth has occurred at colleges with relatively few resources and high dropout rates, which bear little resemblance to the elites.
[C] So what else is going on? One overlooked factor is that top colleges are admitting fewer American students than they did a generation ago. Colleges have globalized over that time, deliberately increasing the share of their student bodies that come from overseas and leaving fewer slots for applicants from the United States. For American teenagers, it is really harder to get into Harvard — or Yale, Stanford, Brown, Boston College or many other elite colleges — than it was when today’s 40-year-olds or 50-year-olds were applying. The number of spots filled by American students at Harvard, after adjusting for the size of the teenage population nationwide, has dropped 27 percent since 1994. At Yale and Dartmouth, the decline has been 24 percent. At Carleton, it’s 22 percent. At Notre Dame and Princeton, it is 14 percent.
[D] The frenzy (狂热) over admissions at top colleges can seem nonstop: the last-minute flurry (忙乱) as accepted students decide by May 1 where to attend, the Supreme Court battles over affirmative action (反歧视运动), the applications that some high school juniors have already begun writing. Yet the globalization of these colleges has been largely missing from the discussion.
[E] This globalization obviously brings some big benefits. It has exposed American students to perspectives that our proudly parochial (狭隘的) country often does not provide in childhood. "It would be a lesser education for them if they didn’t get a chance to interact with some international students," as William Fitzsimmons, the dean of admissions at Harvard since 1986, told me. The trend also fits with the long American tradition of luring some of the world’s most talented people here. Many international students who come for college never leave. Some of them found companies or make other contributions to society.
[F] Yet the way in which American colleges have globalized comes with costs, too. For one thing, the rise in foreign students has complicated the colleges’ stated efforts to make their classes more economically diverse. Foreign students often receive very little financial aid and tend to be from well-off families. For another thing, the country’s most selective colleges have effectively shrunk as far as American students are concerned, during the same span that many students and their parents are spending more time obsessing over getting into one.
[G] Many numbers for individual colleges here come from Noodle, a company that provides advice on education decisions. I combined the numbers with census data on the number of 18- to 21-year-olds in the United States to examine what share of college-age Americans in four different years — 1984, 1994, 2004 and 2012 — were attending various elite colleges. The share for any individual college is extremely small, of course. In 2012, about 33 out of every 100,000 American 18- to 21-year-olds were attending Harvard, down from 45 per 100,000 in 1994. These changes in the share tell you how much harder, or easier, admission has become for American teenagers on average. Between 1984 and 1994, it became easier at many colleges. The college-age population in this country fell during that time to 14.1 million in 1994 from 16.5 million in 1984, and the number of foreign students was relatively stable.
[H] I attended college in the early 1990s, and these numbers made me realize how easy the application process was for me and my peers, relative to almost any other time over the past half century. By the 2000s, the so-called echo boom in births had increased the number of college-age Americans. It reached 17.9 million in 2012. The number of foreign students was growing at the same time. They now constitute close to 10 percent of the student body at many selective colleges, nearly double the level of the early 1990s.
[I] The result is those big declines in the number of available seats for any given American teenager. Only colleges that have rapidly expanded their student bodies, like Columbia and the University of Chicago, have avoided the pattern. Obviously, the averages do not apply equally across the board. For students from the Northeast applying to elite colleges in the region, college admissions have probably become even more difficult in recent decades than these statistics suggest. Not only have colleges globalized, they have also become less regional, admitting more students from states like North Carolina, Texas and Washington.
[J] To many individual students, the newfound difficulty probably doesn’t cause much harm (even if it does cause anxiety). Over the last 20 years, several large colleges, like N.Y.U. and the University of Southern California, have improved markedly, effectively increasing the number of seats on elite campuses, Noodle has noted. And there is still scant (不足的) evidence that the selectivity of the college one attends matters much. Students with similar SAT scores who attended colleges of different selectivity — say, Penn and Penn State — had statistically identical incomes in later years, according to research by the economists Stacy Dale and Alan Krueger.
[K] There was one exception, though: low-income students, who did seem to benefit from attending an elite college. Maybe they benefited more from the social contacts they made there or were more likely to drop out if they did not attend a top college. Either way, the research stresses a problem with the way colleges have globalized. With only a handful of exceptions (including Harvard, Amherst, M.I.T. and Yale), colleges have not tried hard to recruit an economically diverse group of foreign students. The students instead have become a revenue source. Sarah Turner and Kelli Bird, University of Virginia economists, have found that the enrollment of undergraduate foreign students fluctuates with the economic growth and exchange rates of those students’ countries of origin. The pattern is much stronger among undergraduates than doctoral students — a sign that the undergraduates’ families are paying their way.
[L] In recent years, college administrators have repeatedly claimed that enrolling a more economically diverse group of students is a top priority. But their actions don’t always match their words. While some have made progress, the students at many remain overwhelmingly affluent. On average, about 15 percent of students at elite colleges receive Pell grants, which as a rule of thumb go to students in the bottom half of the income distribution.
[M] Foreign students — typically well-off ones — have become another group that college admissions offices have decided should be well represented in every freshman class, along with "legacy" applicants (the children of alumni), varsity (校队) athletes and underrepresented minorities. A large fraction of these groups comes from high-income families. And all of them, along now with students from around the world, are a higher priority for colleges than poor students. Low-income applicants are left to compete for the remaining slots with applicants who have the highest test scores, most impressive extracurricular activities and most eloquent essays.
[N] The globalization of elite colleges, then, is a fitting case study of how higher education has transformed itselfin the last half century. After decades of being dominated by male students coming from a narrow network of prep schools, these schools have become a patchwork of diversity — gender, race, religion and now geography. Underneath the surface, though, that patchwork still has some common threads.
From 1984 to 1994, as college-age population fell, admission to colleges was easier for American students.
选项
答案
G
解析
段倒数第2句提到,从l984年到1994年,许多大学的入学都变得容易了。接下来的句子解释原因:在此期间,国家的大学适龄人口从1984年的1,650万下降到1994年的1,410万,外国学生的人数则相对稳定。题目整合了原文两句话的信息。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/k9OFFFFM
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Somepeoplebelievethatyouhavetobeaspecialkindofpersontosellaproduct.Butalthoughitisclearthatasuccessfuls
Thepast50yearshaveseenmassiveexpansionofagriculture,withfoodproductionmorethandoublinginordertomeetdemand.B
OnModestyAttentiontodetailissomethingeveryonecanandshoulddo—especiallyinatightjobmarket.BobCrossley,ahum
A、Theyreceivefullattentionfromparentsforsometime.B、Theyareborntobemorecompetitive.C、Theyarerequiredtoberole
A、Harmtosingersdonebysmokyatmospheres.B、Sideeffectsofsomecommondrugs.C、Voiceproblemsamongpopsingers.D、Hardship
A、Theyareeagertobecomefamous.B、Manylackprofessionaltraining.C、Fewwillbecomesuccessful.D、Theyliveaglamorouslife
A、Alearningteststrategy.B、Aninterestexperiment.C、Ateachingevaluationprocedure.D、Amockapplicant’sinterview.C事实细节题。
A、Shehasconfidenceinhim.B、Shehasalsowonascholarship.C、Sheissurprisedatthenews.D、Sheisnotinterestedinthene
3Dglasseshelpdoctorsperforminvasivesurgerywhentheirhandsareobscuredfromview.Moviegoersaren’ttheonlyoneswe
ApowerfulearthquakestruckanareanearthenortherncoastofChileonWednesday.Theearthquakecameadayafteranevenstro
随机试题
阅读《论气节》中的两段文字,然后回答问题。……气是敢作敢为,节是有所不为——有所不为也就是不合作。这敢作敢为是以集体的力量为基础的.跟孟子的“浩然之气”与世俗所谓“义气”只注重领导者的个人不一样。后来宋朝几千太学生请愿罢免奸臣,以及明朝东林党的攻
王某,男性,35岁,全身大面积烧伤,仅余面部、颈部和前胸的7处巴掌大的面积未烧伤,则其烧伤面积为()。
证券的票面要素有( )。
从投资人的角度看,下列观点中不能被认同的是()。
马老师在带领学生欣赏日本枯山水时,有学生小声嘀咕“日本有什么好看的”,马老师恰当地引导学生“艺术无国界”,并通过介绍枯山水对中国园林山水的借鉴与在精神层次上的新发展,让学生有了新认识。马老师的做法遵循了课标理念中的()。
未来对于()相当于()对于保护
室内装修污染是新出现的环境污染,是指因装修行为对室内环境所产生的污染,主要是由于人们在室内装修过程中采用不合格装修材料以及不合理的设计造成的。根据上述定义,下列属于室内装修污染的是:
个体力图获得、巩固和利用某种社会资源的内在需要,试图以自己的思想、意图控制他人的愿望,这种动机是
静态图像常用JPEG标准进行信息压缩。目前JPEG中使用(21)算法,它属于(22)方法。JPEG是有损压缩,恢复的图像质量低于原来的图像,为了获得较高信息压缩比,误差主要在(23)中引入。运动图像常采用MPEG标准,它比JPEG有更高的信息压缩比,因为它
A、Therepairmanhadfinishedcleaningtheplugs.B、Therepairmanhadjuststartedworkingonhercar.C、Therepairmanhadlostt
最新回复
(
0
)