首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Things You Can’t Say in Canada A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into o
Things You Can’t Say in Canada A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into o
admin
2016-10-07
29
问题
Things You Can’t Say in Canada
A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into one looked down upon by all others—but it can also be a lot of fun. Every culture has its unacknowledged taboos—the things you are forbidden to say or do in polite company, the accepted truths you are not allowed to doubt. You might think that a liberal, open-minded country like Canada would be free of such taboos, but you’d be wrong. In spite of our belief in our own civilized tolerance, some things are simply not open to debate. If you try, you’re bound to shock the neighbors.
B) It’s risky to question the wisdom of the tribe. You might get stoned. On the other hand, some people might walk secretly up to you afterwards and tell you that they secretly agree. So here’s a challenge to a few of our nation’s most widely held beliefs. You say these things in public at your own danger. I will be elaborating on these points over the months to come. Feel free to stone me or secretly agree—or, even better, add to the list. At the very least, they’re sure to start a good dinner-party fight.
C) Margaret Atwood writes some really awful books. The queen of Canadian literature dominates the literary world like a giant. Nobody has won more awards than she has, and nobody is more feared. There is no such a thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of unpleasant characters and plot filled with torture. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she has put us on the global map. And because if they do, they’ll never work in this country again.
D) Recycling is a waste of time and money. Once upon a time it was easy to put out the trash. Today, the Garbage Gestapo rules our lives. Every household has become a mini version of the village dump, and every one of us has become a garbage picker, carefully separating our organic waste from our bottles and papers, and worrying about where our different kinds of garbage are supposed to go. Don’t try to sort a wine bottle into the wrong bag! The trash police will punish you. The truth about recycling is that it’s a giant waste of dollars and doesn’t help the environment. But don’t tell your kids. They won’t believe you. They’ve been brainwashed.
E) Only private enterprise can save public health care. Tommy Douglas, the CBC’s Greatest Canadian, brought us universal health care. But even his plan didn’t originally pay for everybody’s minor diseases, such as ingrown toenails. His primary goal was to make sure nobody faced financial ruin if they got sick. Today we have a system where controlling costs is more important than treating patients, and where ideology is disabling us. In some places, including Toronto, people go blind waiting for cataract (白内障) surgery. The government could restore their sight tomorrow simply by sending them to a private clinic instead of to a hospital. The cost to the government would be exactly the same. But in Canada, "private" is a dirty word, and so the government would rather you go blind. Poor Tommy would be spinning in his grave.
F) David Suzuki is bad for the environment. From global warming to farmed salmon and genetically modified crops, David Suzuki has just one message: The end is near. He is our homegrown prophet of doom, who can predict what will happen in the future. He advocates the essential wickedness of the human race. Like a modern Savonarola, he warns that unless we cast our material possessions into the bonfire, we’re all going to hell. The trouble with this predicting vision is that people are starting to isolate from the environment. And our hugely expensive investment in the unworkable Kyoto treaty, which Mr. Suzuki tells us doesn’t go nearly far enough, will wipe out more practical measures to cut smog and clean up our waste sites.
G) A national daycare program won’t do a thing to help poor kids. Cheap national daycare! Who could be against it? It’s supposed to give kids a better start in life, and nobody can object to that. But in Quebec, where the program started, universal daycare has turned out to be nothing more than a giant (and extremely costly) subsidy for relatively well-off middle-class parents. Few poor parents use the system. No doubt convenient daycare is a gift sent by god for many people. But so far there is no definitive evidence that kids who go to daycare go on to do better in school or in life. So if we want to invest billions in helping kids, why are we spending it on the kids who need help the least?
H) Group of Seven artists are overexposed genre (类型) painters. I like A.Y. Jackson as much as you do. His paintings remind me of when I went to summer camp. I grew up with a reproduction of The West Wind hanging in our living room. (That was by Tom Thomson, who wasn’t really a member of Group of Seven, but never mind.) Group of Seven were the first artists to depict the wild Canadian landscape, and they were bold young rebels in their time. But that time was 80 years ago. Today their work is the essence of bourgeois picture-postcard art—the kind of art it’s safe to take your mother to see. Enough, already. Maybe it’s time we moved on.
I) The United States is the greatest force for ever the world has ever known. Of all the shocking things you can say around the dinner table, this is the most shocking one. After all, America-criticizing is part of our national identity. At best, we see our neighbor as a well-intentioned but arrogant and wrong-doing bully (欺负弱小者) that throws its weight around too much. At worst, we see our neighbor as one of the most evil nations in the world. And yet, right now, hundreds of millions of people in desperately poor parts of the world are being liberated from millennia of suffering and serfdom. Why? Because of the United States, which has spread its idea of economic freedom—and its purchasing power—around the world.
Almost everyone in Canada becomes a garbage picker and carefully sorts out different kinds of garbage.
选项
答案
D
解析
根据题目中的garbage picker定位到D段第4句。该句中的分词结构carefully separating…是对前面的every one of us has become a garbage picker的补充说明,题目将其变为并列句,句义一致,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/g4pFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Moreandmoreoftheworld’spopulationarelivingintownsorcities.Thespeedatwhichcitiesaregrowinginthelessdevelop
Moreandmoreoftheworld’spopulationarelivingintownsorcities.Thespeedatwhichcitiesaregrowinginthelessdevelop
Aswehaveseen,thefocusofmedicalcareinoursocietyhasbeenshiftingfromcuringdiseasetopreventingdisease—especially
Livinginatimewhenanever-increasingnumberofnewsproviderspushaconstantstreamofheadlinesatuseveryday,peopleca
SocialAging:ABillionShadesofGreyA)WarrenBuffettisasymbolofAmericancapitalism.At83,healsostandsforanoticeab
Asmoredatafromaroundtheworldemergesandnewgenerationsofworkersseektoliveanddowellatonce,investmentsinyoung
A、Tolearnmostdirectroutetoeverysingleroad.B、TolearnmostdirectroutetoeveryimportantbuildinginLondon.C、Tolear
A、Ithelpsstudentsexploretheirhobbies.B、Itprovidesstudentswithopportunitiestodofieldpractice.C、Itoffersposition
TheRedistributionofHopeA)"HOPE"isoneofthemostoverusedwordsinpubliclife,uptherewith"change".Yetitmatterseno
Womenemployeesworkharderandlongerthanmendo,accordingtoanewstudybyindependentresearchconsultancythePonemonIns
随机试题
防治佝偻病方法哪项是不恰当的
男性患儿,5岁,双眼平视前方时上睑缘位于瞳孔上缘的稍下方。查体:上直肌功能正常,上睑缘上提的幅度为6mm。如采用上睑提肌缩短术后1周发现矫正不足,应采取如下哪项措施
某湖水呈现绿色、红色或黄绿色,表明
汇付是指买方将货款通过银行主动汇交卖方的一种顺汇式的支付方式,而托收是由卖方开立信用证,委托银行向买方收取货款的一种逆汇式的支付方式。 ( )
下列不是竣工决算审计内容的是()。
资本资产定价模型是确定普通股资本成本的方法之一,以下说法中正确的是()。
物联网中物体通过信息传感设备,与互联网相连接,进行信息交换和通信,下列不具备信息传感功能的设备是:
根据《中华人民共和国商业银行法》的规定,下列哪些属于不得担任商业银行董事、高级管理人员的情形?()
在窗休中添加了一个文本框和一个命令按佣.(名称分别为tText和bCommand),并编写了相应的事件过程。运行此窗体后,在文本框中输入一个字符,则命令按钮上的标题变为“计算机等级考试”。以下能实现上述操作的事件过程是______。
Howlongdoesaninterviewusuallylastaccordingtothespeaker?
最新回复
(
0
)