首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
32
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
Traditional recruiting providers didn’t make strategic progress because
选项
A、they adopted new ways to help companies.
B、the solutions focused on project.
C、they didn’t find customers.
D、they had no access to best practices and innovative techniques.
答案
B
解析
文中第五段提到“Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.”即:虽然这对公司和招聘服务提供商来说是个新的挑战,但是这些解决方案主要是以项目为基础的,因此,很少把注意力集中到取得战略性的进步上。所以,B项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/eTFsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whatdidthemandorecently?
Whatdidthemandorecently?
Whathasthecompanyrecentlydone?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
随机试题
如果一个大型工程项目在签订施工承包合同后,设计资料的深度和其他条件还不足以编制比较具体的施工总进度计划时,则可先编制()。
A.脉虚者人参汤下,脉实者银花、薄荷汤下B.蜜丸,空心盐白汤送下C.蜜丸,清晨温酒下D.蜜丸,午时姜汤下E.蜜丸,空心酒化下,不拘时
女,29岁,哺乳期,右乳房肿痛2天,无发热,体检:右乳房肿胀,内象限有压痛,无波动感根据以上情况应采取哪项措施
某种饼干生产用的抗氧化剂,成分为:抗坏血酸、d/1-生育酚、蔗糖酯、乙醇、磷酸二氢钠
教师的医疗同当地国家公务员享受同等的待遇;()对教师进行身体健康检查,并因地制宜安排教师进行休养。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律:
为了加强城市管理,提升城市文明水平。市管理委员会决定举行一次监督城管执法的市民招募会,请你提出几点建议。
下列关于我国的HPV疫苗的说法错误的是()。
设n阶非零实方阵A的伴随矩阵为A*,且A*=AT.证明|A|≠0.
Inthecourseoftime,Mr.Earnshawbegantofail.Hehadbeenactiveandhealthy,yethisstrengthlefthimsuddenly;andwhen
最新回复
(
0
)