首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
48
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/dtYYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Note-takingSkillsNote-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityinmanyskills,particularlyinthefollowingfourmostimport
Onemajorobstacletoeconomicdevelopmentispopulationgrowth.Thepopulationsofmostdevelopingcountriesgrewataratemuc
Ourtheoriesabouthumandiseasearetheproductofcurrentfashion【M1】______thanwewouldliketoadmit.Butjustasthe
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.ThissayingoftenattributedwiththelateDuchessofWindsorembodiesmuchofthe【M1】____
Accordingtolegend,theancientOlympicGameswerefoundedbyHeracles,asonofZeus.YetthefirstOlympicGamesforwhich
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.Therecanbefewprospectofraisingthesortofsumsne
It’seasytoseewhythepriceofgasolineissoupsettingtosomanypeople.Gaspricesaretheoneeconomicindicatoryousee
我先是被鸟的鸣声吵醒的。是个夏日的清晨,大概有几十只小鸟在我窗外的槭树上集合了,除了麻雀的吱喳声之外,还有那种小绿鸟的嘤嘤声。我认得那种声音,年年都会有一两对小绿鸟来我的树上筑巢,在那一段时间里,我每天都能听到它们那种特别细又特别娇的鸣声.听了就
除了读书之外,同知心的朋友通信,有时也教我感到一点兴奋。因为写信时可以上天下地的无所不谈,谈的话虽然都不关重要,而且大都是杂乱无章,然而不必像对社会说话时要打起什么腔调。也不必像做学术论文时必须严密地构思。有什么话便说什么,想到那里,笔便写到那里,正是个性
随机试题
关节软骨的特性不包括
肝硬化与右心衰竭的鉴别要点为
40岁妇女,发现接触性出血1个月就诊。宫颈活检报告为轻度非典型增生,进一步处理方法是
背景资料: 某施工单位承担的一项机电安装工程进入单体试运行阶段。项目部计划对一台解体出厂、现场组装的大型裂解石油气压缩机进行试运行,该压缩机转速为5850r/min。试运行前进行检查。确认试运行范围内的工程,压缩机出口管道系统设计压力为11.2MPa,组
按照《安全生产许可证条例》的规定,负责地方建筑施工企业安全生产许可证颁发和管理的部门是()。
今年国庆节期间,香港某文化交流中心(甲单位)组织香港一些中学的师生到大陆过节,交由北京某国际旅行社(乙单位)全权负责安排。由于和乙单位是常年合作关系,甲单位未派领队,乙单位派贾小姐全程接待。9月30日,旅游团从香港直飞北京,贾小姐按计划与司机去接站。还在去
结合中国人民币国际化,利率市场化改革背景,央行形成货币政策+宏观审慎政策双支柱。说明双支柱的货币政策框架的目的和作用。(上海财经大学硕博2018年)
Optimistsoutlivepessimists,anewstudyshows.Ofnearly100,000women【C1】______intheWomen’sHealthInitiative,thosewhoga
软件需求分析的任务不包括(10)。在数据流图中,O(椭圆)代表(11)。(11)
Onlyrecently______todealwiththeenvironmentalproblems.
最新回复
(
0
)