首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these stran
admin
2015-06-14
36
问题
Barack Obama invited a puzzling group of people into the White House: university presidents. What should one make of these strange creatures? Are they chief executives or labour leaders? Heads of pre-industrial guilds or champions of one of America’s most successful industries? Defenders of civilisation or merciless rack-renters?
Whatever they might be, they are at the heart of a political firestorm. Anger about the cost of college extends from the preppiest of parents to the grungiest of Occupiers. Mr. Obama is trying to channel the anger, to avoid being sideswiped by it. The White House invitation complained that costs have trebled in the past three decades. Arne Duncan, the secretary of education, has urged universities to address costs with "much greater urgency".
A sense of urgency is justified: ex-students have debts approaching $1 trillion. But calm reflection is needed too. America’s universities suffer from many maladies besides cost. And rising costs are often symptoms of much deeper problems: problems that were irritating during the years of affluence but which are cancerous in an age of austerity.
The first problem is the inability to say "no". For decades American universities have been offering more of everything—more courses for undergraduates, more research students for professors and more rock walls for everybody—on the merry assumption that there would always be more money to pay for it all. The second is Ivy League envy. The vast majority of American universities are obsessed by rising up the academic hierarchy, becoming a bit less like Yokel-U and a bit more like Yale.
Ivy League envy leads to an obsession with research. This can be a problem even in the best universities: students feel short-changed by professors fixated on crawling along the frontiers of knowledge with a magnifying glass. At lower-level universities it causes dysfunction. American professors of literature crank out 70,000 scholarly publications a year, compared with 13,757 in 1959. Most of these simply moulder: Mark Bauerlein of Emory University points out that, of the 16 research papers produced in 2004 by the University of Vermont’s literature department, a fairly representative institution, 11 have since received between zero and two citations. The time wasted writing articles that will never be read cannot be spent teaching. In "Academically Adrift" Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa argue that over a third of America’s students show no improvement in critical thinking or analytical reasoning after four years in college.
Popular anger about universities’ costs is rising just as technology is shaking colleges to their foundations. The Internet is changing the rules. Star academics can lecture to millions online rather than the chosen few in person. Testing and marking can be automated. And for-profit companies such as the University of Phoenix are stripping out costs by concentrating on a handful of popular courses as well as making full use of the Internet. The Sloan Foundation reports that online enrolments grew by 10% in 2010, against 2% for the sector as a whole.
Many universities’ first instinct will be to batten down the hatches and wait for this storm to pass. But the storm is not going to pass. The higher-education industry faces a stark choice: either adapt to a rapidly changing world or face a future of cheeseparing. It is surely better to rethink the career structure of your employees than to see it wither(the proportion of professors at four-year universities who are on track to win tenure fell from 50% in 1997 to 39% ten years later). And it is surely better to reform yourself than to have hostile politicians take you into receivership.
A growing number of universities are beginning to recognise this. They understand that the beginning of wisdom in academia, as in business in general, is choosing what not to do. They are in recovery from their Ivy League envy. They are also striking up relations with private-sector organisations. And a growing number of foundations, such as the Kauffman Foundation, are doing their best to spread the gospel of reform and renewal.
All the following are mentioned in the passage to deal with problems of college EXCEPT
选项
A、active reform.
B、sensible choices.
C、structural adjustments.
D、cost reduction.
答案
D
解析
细节题。第七段第三句指出“The higher-education industry faces a stark choice:either adapt to arapidly changing world or face a future of cheeseparing.”,此处提到“调整适应”和“面对举步维艰的未来”两种选择,之后对于解决问题提出个人建议,以及高校采取的解决办法,这些办法中没有提到减少开支的问题,故[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ccYYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
WhichofthefollowingnewspaperdoesNOTbelongtothebroadsheetofBritain?
WhichofthefollowingdoesLi-Fimostprobablystandfor?
IntroductiontotheSportsStudiesDepartmentThismini-lecturegivenbytheSportsStudiesDepartmentontheUniversity’sOpen
WhichofthefollowingpartiesadvocatestheindependenceofQuebec?
Whenapidgincomestobeadoptedbyapopulationasitsprimarylanguage,andchildrenlearnitastheirfirstlanguage,thent
Ineducation,Nigeriahasamothertonguepolicywhichrequiresthateverychildistaughtinamothertongueatthepreprimary【
TheSeattleTimesCompanyisonenewspaperfirmthathasrecognizedtheneedforchangeanddonesomethingaboutit.Inthene
和平共处五项原则中国用以指导自己同各国发展关系的一贯原则,是“互相尊重主权和领土完整、互不侵犯、互不干涉内政、平等互利、和平共处”五项原则。我们的国家有100多年被侵略、被压迫的苦难经历,中国人民决不愿再回到过去的屈辱地位,也决不会把任何其他民族置
没有一个人将小草叫做“大力士”,但是它的力量之大,的确是世界无比。这种力,是一般人看不见的生命力,只要生命存在,这种力就要显现,上面的石块,丝毫不足以阻挡,因为它是一种“长期抗战”的力,有弹性,能屈能伸的力,有韧性,不达目的不止的力。种子不落在肥
随机试题
Earlychildhoodisatimeoftremendousgrowthacrossallareasofdevelopment,especiallythelanguageskills.Frombirthupt
简述企业决策按涉及时间长短的分类及各种类型决策的特点。
干燥综合征合并双下肢皮肤紫癜,最可能原因是
髋关节前后位摄影时,应使足尖
腹胀按之不坚,胁下胀满或疼痛,饮食减少,食后胀甚,得嗳气、矢气稍减,小便短少,舌薄苔白腻,脉弦。治疗方法首选
下列各项中,属于资本性支出的是( )。
根据教师发展的五阶段理论,达到()的教师对教学情境有敏锐的直觉感受力,教学行为达到流畅、灵活的程度。
下列关于“一带一路”倡议的说法,不正确的是()。
Ifyoutryto______payingyourtaxes,youriskgoingtoprison.
TheGreatDepressionspreadfromtheUStotherestofthecapitalistworld,yetitaffectedtheAmericansthemost.Itgave【66】
最新回复
(
0
)