首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
admin
2017-12-31
30
问题
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are often fraught with irreconcilable cultural and financial differences. Yet M&A activity was up sharply in 2013 and reached pre-recession levels this year. So why do companies keep at it? Because it’s an easy way to make a quick buck and please Wall Street.
Increasingly, business is serving markets rather than markets serving business, as they were originally meant to do in our capitalist system.
For a particularly stark example, consider American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s recent bid to buy British drugmaker AstraZeneca. The deal made little strategic sense and would probably have destroyed thousands of jobs as well as slowed research at both companies.(Public outcry to that effect eventually helped scuttle the plan.)Rut it would have allowed Pfizer to shift its domicile to Britain, where companies pay less tax. That, in turn, would have boosted share prices in the short term, enriching the executives paid in stock and the bankers, lawyers and other financial intermediaries who stood to gain about half a billion dollars or so in fees from the deal.
Pfizer isn’t alone. Plenty of firms engage in such tax wizardry. This kind of short-term thinking is starting to dominate executive suites. Besides tax avoidance. Wall Street’s marching orders to corporate America include dividend payments and share buybacks, which sap long-term growth plans. It also demands ever more globalized supply chains, which make balance sheets look better by cutting costs but add complexity and risk. All of this hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation. As a recent article on the topic by academic Gautam Mukunda in the Harvard Business Review noted, "The financial sector’s influence on management has become so powerful that a recent survey of chief financial officers showed that 78% would give up economic value and 55% would cancel a project with a positive net present value—that is, willingly harm their companies—to meet Wall Street’s targets and fulfill its desire for ’smooth’ earnings. "
Some of this can be blamed on the sheer size of the financial sector. Many thought that the economic crisis and Great Recession would weaken the power of markets. In fact, it only strengthened finance’s grip on the economy. The largest banks are bigger than they were before the recession, while finance as a percentage of the economy is about the same size. Overall, the industry earns 30% of all corporate profit while creating just 6% of the country’s jobs. And financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money. Legendary investor Warren Buffett recently told me he’s steering well clear of exposure to commercial securities like the complex derivatives being sliced and diced by major banks. He expects these "weapons of mass destruction" to cause problems for our economy again at some point.
There’s a less obvious but equally important way in which Wall Street distorts the economy: by defining "shareholder value" as short-term returns. If a CEO misses quarterly earnings by even a few cents per share, activist investors will push for that CEO to be fired. Yet the kinds of challenges companies face today—how to shift to entirely new digital business models, where to put operations when political risk is on the rise, how to anticipate the future costs of health, pensions and energy— are not quarterly problems. They are issues that will take years, if not decades, to resolve. Unfortunately, in a world in which the average holding period for a stock is about seven months, down from seven years four decades ago, CEOs grasp for the lowest-hanging fruit. They label tax-avoidance schemes as "strategic" and cut research and development in favor of sending those funds to investors in the form of share buybacks.
All of this will put American firms at a distinct disadvantage against global competitors with long-term mind-sets. McKinsey Global Institute data shows that between now and 2025, 7 out of 10 of the largest global firms are likely to come from emerging markets, and most will be family owned businesses not beholden to the markets. Of course, there’s plenty we could do policy-wise to force companies and markets to think longer term—from corporate tax reform to bans on high-speed trading to shifts in corporate compensation. But just as Wall Street has captured corporate America, so has it captured Washington. Few mainstream politicians on either side of the aisle have much interest in fixing things, since they get so much of their financial backing from the Street. Unfortunately for them, the fringes of their parties—and voters—do care.
What is the short-term thinking of the corporate mergers and acquisitions prevalent today? What are the possible drawbacks of such thinking?
选项
答案
to pay less tax(tax avoidance)/ promote share prices in the short term / help the financial executives to gain more in fees / more concerned with "positive net present value" / such thinking would weaken+destroy(sap)long-term growth plans /("add complexity and risk")("hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation")/ does harm to companies("harm the companies")/ only to meet the targets of financial markets + to guarantee the "smooth" earnings for financial sectors
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/cQCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
Thearchaeologistsexcavatedtheruins,coveredthembackupagain,andeverything’sbacktothewayitwas.
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
WhenitrecentlyemergedthatGooglewashelpingthePentagonwiththeAIforadroneproject,someoftheiremployeeswereoutr
Neverunderestimatehowterrifiedmanypeoplearewhenfacedwiththeprospectofgoingintoasolicitor’soffice.
A、Dogscanbedomesticated.B、Dogscancommunicatewithwolves.C、Dogscancommunicatewithhumans.D、Dogscanberaisedinthe
A、Theyhavecausedaseriesofpowerfailuresrecently.B、TheyhavebetrayedtrustofthegeneralpublicC、Theyneedimprovement
A、Thelibraryshoulddeveloptowardsthemulti-operationstrend.B、Thegovernmentwilldecreaseitscapitalinputinthelibrary
Whichofthefollowingisconsideredalandmarkrulingininterracialmarriages?
随机试题
某市人民法院受理了该市人民检察院提起公诉的被告人张某盗窃案,在庭前审查阶段,下列哪些事项不属于审查的内容?
简述斑蝥的功效及主治证。
嗜温菌的生长温度为
有关停止吸氧的操作,下列正确的叙述是
国学是相对于“西学”而言的。从逻辑上说,甚至是先有西学,然后才有国学之说。晚清以前,中国士人生活于自己构想的“天下”中,不知有“西学”,也就不会说“国学”。文明尽在中国,只有中国有学,何以分中、西?待到19世纪末,因为甲午战败,士大夫产生了文化危
2016年4月15日是首个全民国家安全教育日,习近平总书记再次强调国家安全是“头等大事”。通过成立一个机构、构建一个法律体系、讲清一个问题、抓牢一个落脚点,“头等大事”得到全面落实。下列有关说法错误的是()。
鸡尾酒会效应:在鸡尾酒会上.很多人在同时进行着各种交谈.但一个人同一个时刻只能注意和参与其中的一个交谈,这是注意分配的问题。由于心理资源有限,同一时刻只能将信息加以过滤和筛选,以此刻最重要或最有兴趣的信息为注意对象。作为一个选择过滤器,注意就像收音机上的旋
下列现象中,可以说明教育对社会发展起促进作用的是
已知汉字“家”的区位码是2850,则其国标码是()。
Educationofexceptionalchildrenmeansprovisionofspecialeducationalservicestothosechildrenwhoareeitherhandicappedo
最新回复
(
0
)