首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Figuring out if millions of American workers are at risk from on-the-job exposure to hazardous chemicals has long been a thorny
Figuring out if millions of American workers are at risk from on-the-job exposure to hazardous chemicals has long been a thorny
admin
2015-03-25
31
问题
Figuring out if millions of American workers are at risk from on-the-job exposure to hazardous chemicals has long been a thorny scientific problem. Last week, it became a prickly political issue too. Two senior Democrats in Congress demanded that the Bush Administration kill a proposal to change how the Department of Labor conducts the risk assessments that underpin worker safety regulations. Senator Edward Kennedy(D-MA)and Representative George Miller(D-CA), who lead Congress’s labor committees, charged that a leaked draft of the proposal shows that the Administration is rushing to " slip through a rule that may have profound negative impacts on worker safety" before leaving office in January.
Labor Department officials reject the charge, saying that the changes they’re proposing—including one that could reduce a worker’s estimated exposure to dangerous substances—are designed to make risk assessments more "consistent, reliable, and transparent." And they say that if the new guidelines move forward, there will be plenty of time to hash out scientific issues.
Critics are skeptical. "There certainly could be an interesting and worthwhile debate about the technical assumptions that go into risk assessment, but you don’t do that by shoving new guidelines out at the last minute," says David Michaels, an epidemiologist and worker safety advocate at George Washington University in Washington, D. C.
The Administration had not publicly released the proposal as Science went to press. But the draft leaked to The Washington Post calls for several changes in how two agencies, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA)and the Mine Safety and Health Administration, approach risk assessments. One is bureaucratic: It would require the agencies to do more to notify the public—a move critics claim is designed to entangle new rules in red tape.
Another more
controversial
section calls for altering how regulators calculate a key risk measure called "working life." Currently, in most cases the agencies assume that a person works for 45 years(from age 20 to 65)and use that span to calculate potential total exposure to hazardous substances. From that, they estimate how many workers might get sick or die.
But that approach likely overstates risks, the draft says, because few workers stay in the same job for 45 years. To back that view, it includes statistics showing that less than 5% of American workers stay with the same employer for even 35 years. "Thus, the actual exposure of the overwhelming majority of workers will likely be substantially less" than current methods estimate, according to the proposal. Instead, it calls for basing assessments on studies of how long workers actually work each day, and how long they stay in the same industry.
That may not be a bad idea—but it’s not good enough to dump the 45-year assumption, says Adam Finkel, a former OSHA regulator who now teaches at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey in Piscataway. For one thing, regulators often don’t have the time or money to collect such detailed information—if it actually exists, he says. And just because workers change jobs doesn’t necessarily mean that their exposure risks go down, he adds.
Which of the following is true according to the passage?
选项
A、The proposal deemed that the risks of the workers’ exposure to hazardous substances may be over-estimated.
B、It is a good idea to let the OSHA do more to inform the public.
C、The Washington Post demanded the changes in risk evaluation.
D、David Michaels supported the proposal’s idea of changing.
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。根据第六段第一句But that approach likely overstates risks,the draft says,再联系第四段可知,the draft是泄露给The Washington Post的proposal的内容,故draft表达的意思也就是proposal想要表达的,[A]“这个建议认为对工人受有害物质危害的估计可能过高”,符合Butthat approach likely overstates risks,the draft says的意思,故正确。从第四段的最后一句可以看出,要求OSHA和Mine Safety and Health Administration这两个组织do more to notify the public有可能导致bureaucratic,即官僚主义,故排除[B];从第四段可以看出,是the draft leaked to The Washing—ton Post要求评估方式的改变,而非The Washington Post,故排除[C];从第三段可以看出David Mi-chaels对建议提出了批评,故排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/bqFRFFFM
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Youaregoingtoreadalistofheadingsandatextaboutnaturalselection.Choosethemostsuitableheadingfromthelistfor
BillGates,thebillionaireMicrosoftchairmanwithoutasingleearneduniversitydegree,isbyhissuccessraisingnewdoubtsa
Untilrecently,mostpopulationgrowthhasoccurredinrelativelydenseurbanenvironments.In【C1】______words,evenifwewerew
Untilrecently,mostpopulationgrowthhasoccurredinrelativelydenseurbanenvironments.In【C1】______words,evenifwewerew
Untilrecently,mostpopulationgrowthhasoccurredinrelativelydenseurbanenvironments.In【C1】______words,evenifwewerew
Untilrecently,mostpopulationgrowthhasoccurredinrelativelydenseurbanenvironments.In【C1】______words,evenifwewerew
Beingagoodparentishardernowthatithaseverbeenbefore.Inpressurizedmodernlives,demandstobeafulfilledindividua
EverysecondintheUnitedStatesalone,morethan250animalsareslaughteredforfood,addinguptomorethan8billionanimal
EmployeesaredemandingmorefromtheiremployersbecauseIBMismentionedinthethirdparagraphtoshowthat
随机试题
设计概算可分为以下三级()。
项目策划书应该在市场研究报告的_______部分中。()
28岁,孕3产1,确诊为双侧卵巢巧克力囊肿,左侧肿物8cm×8cm×9cm,右侧肿物5cm×5cm×4cm。最适宜的处理原则是下列哪项
患者,女性,30岁。半个月前因急性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术,7日前出现寒战高热伴右上钝痛,伴有恶心呕吐、乏力和食欲减退。查体:体温39.2℃,弛张热型,右上腹饱满,肝区叩痛,肋下2cm可触及肝。导致该病最可能的病原微生物是
关于宪法表现形式的说法,下列哪些选项是正确的?(卷一/2010年第62题)
某县生态环境局与水利局在联合执法过程中,发现某化工厂排污口建在防洪通道上,并对下游河水造成污染,遂联合作出责令该厂限期拆除其排污口的决定。县水利局工作人员田某向该厂送达决定书时,因遭到该厂职工围攻而受伤。该厂不服,以县水利局为被告向人民法院提起行政诉讼。下
一般均衡分析(2013年南京财经大学812西方经济学)
CiscoCatalyst6500交换机采用telnet远程管理方式进行配置,其设备管理地址是194.56.9.178/27,缺省路由是194.56.9.161,下列对交换机预先进行的配置,正确的是()。
Firstofall,successfullanguagelearnersare______.
Bread-makingPeoplemakebreadindifferentways,/butthebreadthat’smadeinBritaincontainsfiveingredients./There’
最新回复
(
0
)