首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
22
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The passage mainly discusses ______. ( )
选项
A、who are to evaluate teachers’ lecturing
B、how to promote teachers
C、how to give lectures in classes
D、how to help improve teachers’ lecturing techniques
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/bc4GFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
WhataresomeoftheproblemsthatChromiumⅥcancause?WhathappenedtopeoplewholivedinWillitsfrom1964~19957
ThefirstAmerican______(perform)ofthisoperawasin1926.
Itoldhimhowtogethere,butperhapsIshouldhavegivenhimamap.
Apartfromthesesciencesthereisphilosophy,about______wewilltalkindetaillater.
Maxhasno______(appreciate)ofthefinerthingsinlife.
Infact,anyonewhowouldchallengeanother’sopinionislikelytobebrandedintolerant.
Onetypeofpersonthatiscommonineverycountryistheonewho______.Intheend,themanwhotriestodoaslittleashec
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
Annprefershiking______thecinema.
Mr.Smithgavehiswifetenpoundforherbirthday--tenprettypoundnotes.Sothedayafterherbirthday,MrsSmithwentshoppi
随机试题
简述项目投资的步骤。
鼻泪管阻塞合并慢性泪囊炎时,泪道冲洗可有
A.0.5×109/LB.2.5×109/LC.5.0×109/LD.7.5×109/LE.10.0×109/L白细胞分类计数时,计数100个白细胞的同时数得有核红细胞数为30个,校正前白细胞总数为13×109/L,校正后白细胞总数为(
不属于增感屏结构的是
甲是出票人,乙、丙、丁为依次背书人,戊从了处取得票据,为持票人。甲在出票时在票面记载“不得转让”字样;丙是限制民事行为能力的人。在戈提出付款遭到拒绝后,他可以采用的救济方法是下列哪项所述方法?()
某上市公司拟聘请独立董事。根据公司法律制度的规定,下列人员中,不得担任该上市公司独立董事的有()。
凤凰古城自实行一票制以来,就_______不断,被_______有与民争利之嫌。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是:
阅读材料并结合背景知识回答问题: 材料第一次革命高潮提出的、我们党过去宣传的政权归苏维埃的口号,曾是革命和平发展、使小资产阶级逐渐清除其幻想的口号。现在和平发展和使政权无痛苦地转归苏维埃已不可能,因为政权事实上已经转移到反革命、资产阶级手中。现在只有彻底
主张以通才教育培养全面发展的人的弗吉里奥在教育内容上推崇的三门课程是()。
下列哪种情形属于手段不能犯的未遂?()
最新回复
(
0
)