首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
admin
2013-05-29
31
问题
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this work most ethically. We concluded that it is vitally important for everyone, scientists and consumers alike, to remain alert to the ethical issues we may face as the world becomes filled with embedded, invisible computers.
Computer chips have been inserted into everyday objects since the earliest days of the microprocessor. Today, an average home might have 40 chips in various devices, from remote controls to alarm clocks to wristwatches. This fact has raised few new ethical issues. But as computers become more and more ubiquitous, and less visually obvious, three questions arise. Firstly, will these chips thinking for us make us forget how to think for ourselves? Secondly, will an "information underclass" without access to these devices be created? And thirdly, will these chips invade our privacy?
The goal of ubiquitous computing is to make technology invisible and, by embedding computers into everyday things, make the things themselves smarter. But will this lead to dumber people with less control over their technology? Automobiles, for example, use embedded computers for a host of functions that improve their performance and reliability. But fewer people now know enough about their car to be their own mechanic. Should this loss of a once common skill concern us? I think not. Ever since the first pre-human shaped a stone into an axe, we have been improving our technology. The invention of the axe did represent a loss of control, because some people were better at making axes than others. But the axe also made life easier, so we had more time to develop other skills, like agriculture, art and writing. As another step along this continuum of invention, ubiquitous computing won’t make people dumber; it will give them time to get smart about other things.
I believe, however, that everyone should be given an equal opportunity to get smart about other things. In this regard, there is legitimate concern that the new ubiquitous computers won’t be equally available to everyone, thus driving a wedge between high-tech "haves" and "have-nots". But it is important to realize that the prime mover behind the latest technology is not the technology itself, but an agreement—the Internet.
Agreeing on low computers should talk to one another on the internet has tremendous advantages for exchanging information, decreasing the cost of technology and creating new market opportunities. If all chips are able to relate to each other, then information can be shared cheaply. This means that Internet access may eventually cost only a dollar or two. If the trend towards ever cheaper, more widespread access to information continues, there will be no information underclass.
Ubiquitous computing will make our lives more convenient, but it will also allow computers to know everything about us. Private actions, such as reading the newspaper, may be shared with other computers—and their owners—all over the world. When computers know so much, whom will they tell?
If a computer runs your toaster, for example, it knows when you make toast, and how many slices. By correlating toast-making activity with the license plate numbers of cars parked in front of your house, a computer could determine if a guest had spent the night. But if you were a married politician, and even if you were not, your might want to keep this information secret.
Democracy is based on the principle that if people have enough information, wise decisions will be made. In an age in which embedded computers will provide us with ever more information, it is vital that the ethical implications of this new technology be openly debated. With a little vigilance and planning, we can reap the benefits of this new technology without compromising our intelligence, our opportunities or our freedom.
While discussing whether information will be widely available in the long run, the author centers his analysis on matters of ______.
选项
A、cost
B、human nature
C、intellectual property rights
D、mass media
答案
A
解析
文中第五段在谈到电脑前景时,作者的论述都是围绕“降低成本”(decreasing the cost of technology)展开,因此A为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/XeSYFFFM
0
研究生英语学位课统考(GET)
相关试题推荐
ThedevelopmentandwidespreaduseofcomputertechnologyandtheInternethavetransformedhowwecommunicate,howwecommunica
Howmuchpaindoanimalsfeel?Thisisaquestionwhichhascausedendlesscontroversy.Opponentsofbiggameshooting,forexam
Thecar,andtheroadsittravelson,willberevolutionizedinthetwentyfirstcentury.Thekeytotomorrow’s"smartcars"wil
Thecar,andtheroadsittravelson,willberevolutionizedinthetwentyfirstcentury.Thekeytotomorrow’s"smartcars"wil
Thecar,andtheroadsittravelson,willberevolutionizedinthetwentyfirstcentury.Thekeytotomorrow’s"smartcars"wil
Giventheadvantageofelectronicmoney,youmightthinkthatweshouldmovequicklytothecashlesssocietyinwhichallpaymen
Giventheadvantageofelectronicmoney,youmightthinkthatweshouldmovequicklytothecashlesssocietyinwhichallpaymen
Themultibillion-dollarinternationalpharmaceuticalindustryhasbeenaccusedofmanipulatingtheresultsofdrugtrialsforfi
Whoeverhasskillsandknowledgeinthiscountry,Ibelieve,shouldbeproperlytreatedandrewarded______hiseducationalbackgr
Germany,Europe’seconomicpowerhouse,doesnotlackcourage:itreboundedfromtwoworldwars,digestedreunificationandhasn
随机试题
请论述高晓声小说创作的思想和艺术成就。
下列属于暖肝煎的组成药物是()
黄河公司以其房屋作抵押,先后向甲银行借款100万元,乙银行借款300万元,丙银行借款500万元,并依次办理了抵押登记。后丙银行与甲银行商定交换各自抵押权的顺位,并办理了变更登记,但乙银行并不知情。因黄河公司无力偿还三家银行的到期债务,银行拍卖其房屋,仅得价
项目准备阶段产生的工作成果有()。
下列关于船舶吨税的说法,不正确的是()。
关于商品房销售代理中“参与代理”的说法,正确的是()。
按照我国优先股试点管理办法的有关规定,上市公司公开发行优先股应当在公司章程中规定的事项有()。
牛津大学的某团队做了一项针对一般人群的噩梦研究。该团队招募了800人参与实验研究,研究了他们最近两周的睡眠时长及噩梦数量,然后给它们的严重程度打分。他们惊讶地发现,睡眠超过9小时,做噩梦的频率比睡眠9小时以下的更高。所以得出结:论睡得越久,噩梦越多。
简述进步主义教育运动的始末。
Wikipedia’sTrembling[A]Wikipediaisdying!Wikipediaisdying!That’sthelinerepeatedbythemediaeverysixmonthsorsosi
最新回复
(
0
)