首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Living with parents edges out other living arrangements for 18- to 34-year-olds A) Broad demographic (人口的) shifts in marital
Living with parents edges out other living arrangements for 18- to 34-year-olds A) Broad demographic (人口的) shifts in marital
admin
2022-07-23
49
问题
Living with parents edges out other living arrangements for 18- to 34-year-olds
A) Broad demographic (人口的) shifts in marital status, educational attainment and employment have transformed the way young adults in the U. S. are living, and a new Pew Research Center analysis highlights the implications of these changes for the most basic element of their lives—where they call home. In 2014, for the first time in more than 130 years, adults ages 18 to 34 were slightly more likely to be living in their parents’ home than they were to be living with a spouse or partner in their own household.
B) This turn of events is fueled primarily by the dramatic drop in the share of young Americans who are choosing to settle down romantically before age 35. Dating back to 1880, the most common living arrangement among young adults has been living with a romantic partner, whether a spouse or a significant other. This type of arrangement peaked around 1960, when 62% of the nation’s 18- to
34-year-olds were living with a spouse or partner in their own household, and only one-in-five were living with their parents.
C) By 2014, 31.6% of young adults were living with a spouse or partner in their own household, below the share living in the home of their parent(s) (32.1%). Some 14% of young adults lived alone, were a single parent or lived with one or more roommates. The remaining 22% lived in the home of another family member (such as a grandparent, in-law or sibling (兄弟姐妹), a non-relative, or in group quarters like college dormitories.
D) It’s worth noting that the overall share of young adults living with their parents was not at a record high in 2014. This arrangement peaked around 1940, when about 35% of the nation’s 18- to 34-year-olds lived with mom and/or dad (compared with 32% in 2014). What has changed, instead, is the relative share adopting different ways of living in early adulthood, with the decline of romantic coupling pushing living at home to the top of a much less uniform list of living arrangements.
E) Among young adults, living arrangements differ significantly by gender. For men aged 18 to 34, living at home with mom and/or dad has been the dominant living arrangement since 2009. In 2014, 28% of young men were living with a spouse or partner in their own home, while 35% were living in the home of their parent(s). Young women, however, are still more likely to be living with a spouse or romantic partner (35%) than they are to be living with their parent(s) (29%).
F) In 2014, more young women (16%) than young men (13%) were heading up a household without a spouse or partner. This is mainly because women are more likely than men to be single parents living with their children. For their part, young men (25%) are more likely than young women (19%) to be living in the home of another family member, a non-relative or in some type of group quarters.
G) A variety of factors contribute to the long-run increase in the share of young adults living with their parents. The first is the postponement of, if not retreat from, marriage. The average age of first marriage has risen steadily for decades. In addition, a growing share of young adults may be avoiding marriage altogether. A previous Pew Research Center analysis projected that as many as one-in-four of today’s young adults may never marry. While cohabitation (同居) has been on the rise, the overall share of young adults either married or living with an unmarried partner has substantially fallen since 1990.
H) In addition, trends in both employment status and wages have likely contributed to the growing share of young adults who are living in the home of their parent(s), and this is especially true of young men. Employed young men are much less likely to live at home than young men without a job, and employment among young men has fallen significantly in recent decades. The share of young men with jobs peaked around 1960 at 84%. In 2014, only 71% of 18- to 34-year-old men were employed. Similarly with earnings, young men’s wages (after adjusting for inflation) have been on a downward trajectory (轨迹) since 1970 and fell significantly from 2000 to 2010. As wages have fallen, the share of young men living in the home of their parent(s) has risen.
I) Economic factors seem to explain less of why young adult women are increasingly likely to live at home. Generally, young women have had growing success in the paid labor market since 1960 and hence might increasingly be expected to be able to afford to live independently of their parents. For women, delayed marriage—which is related, in part, to labor market outcomes for men—may explain more of the increase in their living in the family home.
J) The Great Recession (and modest recovery) has also been associated with an increase in young adults living at home. Initially in the wake of the recession, college enrollments expanded, boosting the ranks of young adults living at home. And given the weak job opportunities facing young adults, living at home was part of the private safety net helping young adults to weather the economic storm.
K) Beyond gender, young adults’ living arrangements differ considerably by education—which is tied to financial means. For young adults without a bachelor’s degree, as of 2008 living at home with their parents was more prevalent than living with a romantic partner. By 2014, 36% of 18- to 34-year-olds who had not completed a bachelor’s degree were living with their parent (s) while 27% were living with a spouse or partner. Among college graduates, in 2014 46% were married or living with a partner, and only 19% were living with their parents(s). Young adults with a college degree have fared much better in the labor market than their less-educated counterparts, which has in turn made it easier to establish their own households.
Around the mid-20th century, only 20 percent of 18- to 34-year-olds lived in their parents’ home.
选项
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/R7biFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
在窗体上有命令按钮“Command1”,文本框“Text1”,编写如下程序:Functionresult(xAsInteger)AsBooleanIfxMod2=0Thenresult=TrueEls
中国的人口发展形势非常严峻,为此国家统计局每10年进行一次全国人口普查,以掌握全国人口的增长速度及规模。按照下列要求完成对第五次、第六次人口普查数据的统计分析:对两个工作表中的数据区域套用合适的表格样式,要求至少四周有边框、且偶数行有底纹,并将所有人口
Whydoestheideaofprogressloomsolargeinthemodernworld?Surelybecauseprogressofaparticularkindisactually【C1】___
Chicago’sChildren’sHospitalistheluckyreceiverofasurprise$18milliongiftfromGladysHolm.Sheoncewasasecretarywh
WhatdoesthespeakersayaboutthecostofRicksonCenterservices?
Accordingtothereport,whatmeasurewillthegovernmenttake?
Howmuchhastheinternationalchildren’swelfarepledgedforpovertyreductionoverthenextdecade?
Sinceadvertisementexpensesformpartofthecostofproduction,whichhastobecoveredbythesellingprice,obviouslyitis
Thehumanthirstforknowledgeisthedrivingforcebehindoursuccessfuldevelopmentasaspecies.Butcuriositycanalsobeda
A、Sheisonlyacountrygirloriginally.B、SheleavesChicagotoearnaliving.C、Sheisamodelofcleanliving.D、Shelivesa
随机试题
简述拍卖的一般程序。
Misconductisawordthatisalwaysonprofessors’minds.Incidentsinthenewstendtodescribethemostseriousviolationsof
下列哪些表现有助于甲状腺恶性结节的诊断()(2003年)
A.显于风关B.达于气关C.达于命关D.透关射甲E.未超风关病情凶险者,指纹的表现是
痛经的治疗阐述中,错误的为
重要性与审计风险之间存在正向关系。重要性水平越高,审计风险越高;重要性水平越低,审计风险越低。()
经营漂流旅游企业应对漂流工具操作人员进行的培训为()。
10个相同的盒子中分别装有l~10个球,任意2个盒子中的球数都不相同。小李分三次每次取出若干个盒子中的球,每次取出的盒子中的球数之和都是上一次的3倍,且最后剩下1个盒子。那么,剩下的盒子中有多少个球?
已知某日巴黎外汇市场欧元兑美元的报价为:即期汇率1.2810/403个月掉期率60/106个月掉期率120/50求:客户买入美元,择期从即期到6个月时的择期汇率;
Manyoftoday’scollegestudentsaresufferingfromaformofshock.Lisaisagoodexampleofastudentinshock.Sheisanatt
最新回复
(
0
)