首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
admin
2017-07-14
40
问题
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us.
One day, science says a glass of red wine a day will help us live longer.
The next day, maybe not. It seems journalists are pretty interested in wine research and the same might be said for coffee. Now, there’s been a lot of research into whether coffee’s good for our health. " The results have really been mixed, " admits Neal Freedman who led the coffee study and published his findings in a medical journal recently. "There’s been some evidence that coffee might increase the risk of certain diseases and there’s also been maybe more recent evidence that coffee may protect against other diseases as well. "
Freedman and his colleagues undertook the biggest study yet to look at the relationship between coffee and health. They analyzed data collected from more than 400, 000 Americans ages 50 to 71 participating in the study. " We found that the coffee drinkers had a modestly lower risk of death than those no-drinkers, " he said. Here’s what he means by "modestly": those who drank at least two or three cups a day were about 10 percent or 15 percent less likely to die for any reason during the 13 years of the study. When the researchers looked at specific causes of death, coffee drinking appeared to cut the risk of dying from heart disease, lung disease, injuries, accidents and infections.
Now, Freedman stressed that the study doesn’t prove coffee can make people live longer. A study like this can never prove a cause-and-effect relationship.
All it can really do is to point researchers in the right direction for further investigation.
And even if it turns out that coffees really good for you, scientists have no idea why.
According to the passage, which of the following is TRUE?
选项
A、Freedman and his colleagues hired 400, 000 Americans to collect data.
B、About four hundred thousand Americans worked for Freedman’s team full time for 13 years.
C、People who took part in Freedman’s research are about 50 to 70 years old.
D、People who are 50 to 70 years old seldom drink coffee.
答案
C
解析
细节题。根据第二段第二句They analyzed data collected from more than 400,000 Americans ages 50 to 71 participating in the study.可知选项C正确,故为答案。弗里德曼做研究的时 候并不是雇用了这些人,所以A和B的说法都不对。在这些参与者中,明明是有的喝咖啡,有的 不喝咖啡,D属于无中生有。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/NOGYFFFM
0
成人本科学位英语
相关试题推荐
Everyplaceisdifferent.Thatis【C1】______makesgeographysointeresting.It【C2】______ustonewplaces,todifferentwaysofli
Americanswhoremember"thegoodoldclays"arenotaloneincomplainingabouttheeducationalsysteminthiscountry.Immigrant
Television,itisoftensaid,keepsoneinformedaboutcurrentevents,allowsonetofollowthe【C1】______developmentsinscience
Whetherornotsolarenergycansaveyourmoneydependsonmanythings.Whereyouliveisonefactor.
—Hello.MayIspeaktoMike?—______.Pleasecallbacklater.
Ineverycultivatedlanguagetherearetwogreatclassesofwordswhich,takentogether,comprisethewholevocabulary.First,t
SpeakerA:I’dliketobookaticketfornextMondaymorningtoNewYork.SpeakerB:
SpeakerA:SofarasIcansee,itisthefaultonthethirdparty.SpeakerB:______
Mr.Wilsonsaidthathedidnotwantto()anyfurtherresponsibilities.
随机试题
驾驶机动车下坡可采用熄火滑行的方法。
影响焊接变形的因素有哪些?
浪漫主义的哲学基础是____________。最早在理论上倡导浪漫主义文学思潮的国家是德国。
患者女,19岁。家人发现患者半年前出现在晚上入睡约1小时后,突然起床,吃东西,开抽屉拿东西,眼神茫然,数分钟后又自行上床入睡。次日均否认这些行为。发作没有规律,有时一周一次,有时几周一次,遂来就诊。患者肝肾功能、心电图、脑电图、头部MRI等检查均未见异
Apgar评分的内容主要包括
属于剧毒类的有机磷杀虫剂是
下列哪项不是高血压时脑部的病理变化
根据《安全生产法》规定,为加强安全管理,政府要求施工单位要为从业人员缴纳工伤保险,关于该保险费缴纳的说法,正确的是()。
唯物主义和唯心主义是两种根本对立的哲学派别,两者的斗争交织着()。
Theathleticprogramisexpectedtobringpublicitytotheschool,attractstudents,fosterstudentunity,andencouragealumni
最新回复
(
0
)