首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe— the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpet
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe— the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpet
admin
2022-11-10
393
问题
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe— the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpetrated on the American people"—remember this: He was once five. That matters, because Inhofe wasn’t merely a lot younger back then, he was a lot wiser—at least where the environment is concerned. That, according to a study from the Teacher Training College in Bilbao Spain, is true not just of the gentleman from Oklahoma, but all of us.
Educators and people who work with small children know that they’re anarchists (无政府主义者) by nature, but children also live in a world full of rules. Some of those rules are taught—raise your hand in class, don’t interrupt other people; some seem more innate—don’t hit other children, don’t hurt animals. As reported in a story, psychologists like to posit the difference between telling a kindergartener that the teacher has suspended the rule against eating snacks in class and telling the same child that the teacher has suspended the no-hitting rule. In the first case, the child will grab the nearest cookie. In the second, the child will typically hesitate and refuse to hit, and may even say the teacher is wrong.
To test where living things fall on this do-no-harm spectrum, Training College researcher Jose Domingo Villaroel assembled a sample group of 118 boys and girls, ages 4 to 7, from local public schools. He started with the basics, showing the kids two sets of four pictures each—a dog, a tree, a bird and a flower; and the sun, clouds, a car and a motorcycle—and asked which of them was alive and which not. As it turned out, the youngest kids particularly would often exclude the tree from the living things category but include the car or the motorcycle.
Villaroel next asked them to respond to two situations. In the first they were presented with a set of social rules (rules against nose-picking and eating sloppily) and a set of interpersonal rules (don’t take other kids’ toys or hurt other kids). In the second they were presented the same social rules and a set of environmental rules (don’t step on flowers, don’t carve your name into a tree with a knife). In both cases they were asked to pick which rules were the worse ones to break. In both cases the social rules were abandoned first.
It was perhaps unsurprising that kids understand intuitively why harming other children is a worse offense than showing bad manners. Even at an early age children have a growing sense of empathy, and they understand what it would feel like to be hit themselves or have a toy taken away. But children aren’t flowers or trees, and yet they showed them equal concern—and that included the kids who didn’t realize that plant life is life at all.
The study is hardly airtight. It’s possible that the children did not give a hoot about the flowers and were just parroting rules they’d been taught or had observed. But they were taught the good-manners rule too. Villaroel wasn’t concerned with whether they understood right and wrong as absolutes, but rather in degrees—which thing was more right or more wrong. And on that metric, nature scored a big win.
There’s a whole lot of developmental ground covered between the time you’re a five-year-old preschooler and a 55-year-old policymaker, and our better angels don’t always survive the trip. But it’s encouraging to know we start out with them—and it’s worth trying to hang onto them as long as we can.
Which of the following is TRUE about the research conducted by Jose Domingo Villaroel?
选项
A、In the first set of experiments, the kids seemed to regard self-motion as the defining quality.
B、Jose Domingo Villaroel has got the desirable outcome from his experiments.
C、In the second set of experiments, the kids would generally hesitate before breaking social rules.
D、His research result is confirmed by the similar experiments conducted in other countries.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/LldMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Afterworkingforthecompanyforyears,he_______thepositionofmanager.
Weseemtobelightonfuel.Theunderlinedpartmeans______.
Thecomputerrevolutionmaywellchangesocietyas______asdidtheIndustrialRevolution.
_______ifIhadattendedyourhomepartyyesterdaywithoutinformingyoubeforehand?
Everymemberofsocietyhastomakea_______tostruggleforthefreedomofthecountry.
It’shightimewe______cuttingdowntherainforests.
PreparingFishforDryingandSmoking1.Driedfish■cutofftheheadifthefishislong■【T1】_______inside,rubsal
StopBeingaPeoplePleaser1.Say"no"■Givereasonsinsteadof【T1】______excuses【T1】______■Examples■It’ss
SportsMedicineSportsmedicineisthepartofthemedicalprofession/thatprovideshealthcareforpeoplewhotakepar
Onemustremembertoremainquietwhen________attendsaconcert.
随机试题
下列各组用以表示公布专利文献的国家或机构的国际标准代码,哪些存在错误?
试述上市公司股东大会决议及表决方式。
膜电位突然由静息电位改变为0mV时
患者,男性,65岁,主因“急性广泛前壁心肌梗死”入院,入院后给予扩冠、抗凝等治疗后患者胸痛减轻。人院后8小时患者突然出现严重呼吸困难,伴大汗淋漓、面色苍白、口唇发绀,并咳大量粉红色泡沫样痰,此时应采取的治疗措施中不妥的是
患者男性,32岁,既往健康。右上腹不适,乏力,恶心,食欲下降2周,巩膜黄染1周,申请腹部超声检查。超声可见肝形态饱满,右肝斜径147mm,肝实质回声均匀减低,肝内门静脉分支管壁回声增强,肝内胆管不扩张,胆总管内径6mm,胆囊大小为42mm×14mm,胆
讨论法有什么特点?它与探究一研讨教学方法在运用上有什么不同?
维持身体姿势的最基本反射是()。
在考生文件夹下,打开文档WORD1.docx,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名(WORD1.docx)保存文档。【文档开始】高速CMOS的静态功耗在理想情况下,CMOS电路在非开关状态时没有直流电流从电源Vcc到地,因而器件没有静态功耗。对
ForthepeoplewhohavenevertraveledacrosstheAtlanticthevoyageisafantasy.Butforthepeoplewhocrossitfrequentlyo
A、Studying.B、Playingcards.C、Preparingsnacks.D、Learninghowtoplaybridge.C[听力原文]Howdoesthewomanplantospendhereve
最新回复
(
0
)