首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
42
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What will the author talk about in the following paragraph?
选项
A、He will continue to talk about the history of RPO.
B、He will talk about the principles of raising the efficiency and end result of the RPO solution.
C、He will talk about the types of RPO.
D、He will talk about different RPO solutions.
答案
B
解析
文中第二段提到“Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.”即:我们在看这些原则之前,先了解一下招聘流程外包的发展历史,所以,B项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/FZFsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whathasthecompanyrecentlydone?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatdidthemayorrecentlydo?
Whattypeoffacilitywasrecentlybuilt?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
Whywasthewomanbusyrecently?
随机试题
A.芳香开窍B.豁痰息风C.二者均可D.二者均不可(2005年第63;1993年第113,114题)中风,猝然昏倒,不省人事,面门唇暗,牙关紧闭,两手握固,四肢小温,喉中痰呜,舌苔白腻,脉沉滑者治宜()
油田注水水源分为地面水源、地下水源和()三种。
甲公司向乙公司购买价值50万元的彩电。合同约定,甲公司先预付20万元货款,其余30万元货款在提货后3个月内付清,并由丙公司提供连带保证担保,但未约定保证范围。提货1个月后,甲公司在征得乙公司同意后,将30万元债务转移给欠其30万元货款的丁公司。对此,丙公司
受国家政策扶持,3D打印产业及市场呈现爆发式增长。智创三维有限公司是国内一家3D打印设备制造商,该公司通过仿造国外同类产品,制造用来打印珠宝、齿科产品等中小型产品的3D打印设备。但是,受技术水平的制约,其产品质量欠佳,故障率明显高于国外同类产品。根据SWO
81,—8,1,0,1,()
左边四个图形呈现一定的规律性,请你从右边所给的备选答案中选出一个最合理的正确答案。
按照中国古代“准五服以制罪”的刑法原则,相对于侵犯一般人而言,法律对侄子殴打叔父行为的处罚()。
中国共产党提出的巩固抗日民族统一战线的策略总方针是()
“凡事预则立,不预则废”,在哲学上反映的是()
Justsevenyearsago,theTexasLegislatureprescribedthatallhighschoolersmustpasstwomathcoursesandgeometrytogradua
最新回复
(
0
)