首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2013-09-28
53
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farrell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farrell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident".
In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another. In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads — against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT
选项
A、political power.
B、high fares.
C、economic loss.
D、indifference.
答案
C
解析
细节题。该文章最后一段中提到人们“be aroused resentment”的原因,包括A political power,B high fares和D indifference,只有C 没有提及,所以答案为C
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/EfJMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whatistheconversationfocusedon?
ThoughIraqagreedtolettheAmericanU-2surveillanceplanejointheU.N.inspection,______.
Nearlyhalftheworld’spopulationwillexperience【C1】______watershortagesby2025,【C2】______theUnitedNations.Wars【C3】_____
Whatarethespeakerstalkingabout?
Whatarethespeakersmainlydiscussing?
Whyshouldpruningbedone?
Whichofthestatementsdoyouthinkcouldnotcauseadrivertohaveanaccident?
Theyovercameallthedifficultiesandcompletedtheprojecttwomonthsaheadoftime,______issomethingwehadnotexpected.
WhichismostappropriatetodescribeSallyaftershecamebackschool?
Wherewillthewill-bemanagersofMcDonaldbetrained?
随机试题
设计PCR引物时
张某.26岁,已婚未育,末次月经日期记不清,来医院检查时子宫底在脐上1横指,胎心音正常,估计妊娠为()。
护理质量控制以预防为主。护理部质控组运用PDCA的管理办法,定期到临床进行查找存在问题,在检查中注重要素质量、环节质量和终末质量,发现产生质量问题的原因,针对主要原因定出具体实施计划,贯彻和实施预定的计划和措施,反馈预定目标执行情况,并总结经验教训,将存在
根据《合同法》的相关规定,下列施工合同履行过程中发生的情形,当事人可以解除合同的有()。【2007年考试真题】
购买性支出包括()。
外国甲公司收购中国境内乙公司的部分资产,收购价款为160万美元,并以该资产作为m资与境内丙公司于2008年4月1日成立了一家中外合资经营企业。甲公司支付乙公司收购价款的下列方式中,符合外商投资企业法律制度规定的是()。
某市商业银行2005年第2季度有关业务资料如下:(1)向生产企业贷款取得利息收入600万元,逾期贷款的罚息收入8万元;(2)为电信部门代收电话费取得手续费收入14万元;(3)4月10日购进有价证券800万元,6月25日以860万元的
据《中国证券报》报道,相关各方已就我国民营银行试点的有关事宜达成一致。业内人士预计,入围首批试点的民营银行的牌照最快于2014年初“出炉”。民营银行的发展是我国银行业改革的大趋势,但我国政府需要采取何种政策来规避银行业的风险?
设二次型f(x1,x2,x3,x4)=x12+2x1x2-x22+4x2x3一x32—2ax3x4+(a一1)2x2的规范形式为y12+y22一y32,则参数a=_______.
A、Yes,speaking.B、Allright.C、Iamnotsure.D、Lookout.C问题问的是飞机会准时起飞吗?本题是将来时,肯定回答通常为Yes,itwill/Yes,Ithinkso等,否定回答通常为No,I
最新回复
(
0
)