首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Very soon, unimaginably powerful technologies will remake our lives. This could have dangerous consequences, especially because
Very soon, unimaginably powerful technologies will remake our lives. This could have dangerous consequences, especially because
admin
2015-01-15
36
问题
Very soon, unimaginably powerful technologies will remake our lives. This could have dangerous consequences, especially because we may not even understand the basic science underlying them. There’s a growing gap between our technological capability and our underlying scientific understanding. We can do very clever things with the technology of the future without necessarily understanding some of the science underneath, and that is very dangerous.
The technologies that are particularly dangerous over the next hundred years are nano-technology, artificial intelligence and biotechnology. The benefits they will bring are beyond doubt but they are potentially very dangerous. In the field of artificial intelligence there are prototype designs for something that might be 50,000 million times smarter than the human brain by the year 2010. The only thing not feasible in the film Terminator is that the people win. If you’re fighting against technology that is much smarter than you, you probably will not win. We’ve all heard of the grey goo problem that self-replicating nanotech devices might keep on replicating until the world has been reduced to sticky goo, and certainly in biotechnology, we’ve really got a big problem because it’s converging with nanotechnology. Once you start mixing nanotech with organisms and you start feeding nanotech-enabled bacteria, we can go much further than the Borg in Star Trek, and those superhuman organisms might not like us very much.
We are in a world now where science and commerce are increasingly bedfellows. The development of technology is happening in the context of global free trade regimes which see technological diffusion embedded with commerce as intrinsically a good. We should prepare for new and unfamiliar forms of argument around emerging technologies.
Why does the author say it is not feasible in the film Terminator that the humans win?
选项
A、Because the power of the technology was exaggerated.
B、Because the strength of the machines would be much greater.
C、Because machines with that much intelligence would not allow it.
D、Because even heroic humans would achieve nothing from such a battle.
答案
C
解析
从第2段可知,电影《终结者》中唯一不可能实现的是人类会胜出。假如你在和比自己聪明得多的技术对抗,你可能不会取胜。这两句话的关系是前果后因。因此C项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/D3OjFFFM
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
ItistheinteractionAbetweenpeople,Bratherthantheeventsthatoccurintheirlives,thatCarethemainfocusDofsocialps
What’syourearliestchildhoodmemory?Canyourememberlearningtowalk?Ortalk?Thefirsttimeyou【C1】______thunderorwatche
Revengeisoneofthosethingsthateveryoneenjoys.Peopledon’tliketotalkaboutit,though.Justthesame,thereisnothing
Computerswillflourishbecausetheyenableustoaccomplishtasksthatcouldneverbeforehavebeenundertaken.
Andreaallowedthehitchhikertotakearideinhercar,mainlybecause______Andreascreamedbecause
Presumably,excessiveconsumptionoffriedfoodshasseriousconsequencesashasbeenproved.
Thehugegrowthofglobal"ecotourism"industryisbecominganincreasingconcernforconservationistswithmountingevidenceth
Allinformationreportedtoorlikewiseobtainedbythecommissionisconsideredconfidential.
WillAmericansgoforAT&T’splanofpushingthewirelessservicesintheU.S.?
Directions:Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsaboutMyApproachtoPerson
随机试题
碘量法测定小麦粉中过氧化苯甲酰含量的原理:在丙酮溶液中,过氧化苯甲酰与碘化钾反应生成(),以硫代硫酸钠标准溶液滴定。
什么是爆炸品?
徐志摩《再别康桥》的诗性美感主要体现在
慢性溃疡性牙髓炎慢性闭锁性牙髓炎
长期服用洋地黄的患者出现心电图上ST—T呈鱼钩样改变,是因为()
定喘汤的功用是
实质性加工
某企业转让一项专利权,与此有关的资料如下:该专利权的账面余额50万元,已摊销20万元,计提资产减值准备5万元,取得转让价款28万元,应交税费1.68万元。假设不考虑其他因素,该企业应确认的转让无形资产净收益为()万元。
Inthelumberyardbythelake,wheretreesfromthewoodswereturnedintoboardsforconstructionwork,therewasanoldbrick
A、Itcostsnomorethanthenormalconstruction.B、Itdoesapoorjoboffacingextremeweather.C、Itholdsupmuchbettertoex
最新回复
(
0
)