首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The most obvious difference between real essays and the things one has to write in school is that real essays are not exclusivel
The most obvious difference between real essays and the things one has to write in school is that real essays are not exclusivel
admin
2012-11-30
29
问题
The most obvious difference between real essays and the things one has to write in school is that real essays are not exclusively about English literature. Certainly schools should teach students how to write. But due to a series of historical accidents the teaching of writing has gotten mixed together with the study of literature. And so all over the country students are writing not about how a baseball team with a small budget might compete with the Yankees, or the role of color in fashion, or what constitutes a good dessert, but about symbolism in Dickens.
How did things get this way? To answer that we have to go back almost a thousand years. Around 1100, Europe at last began to catch its breath after centuries of chaos, and once they had the luxury of curiosity they rediscovered what we call "the classics." The effect was rather as if we were visited by beings from another solar system. These earlier civilizations were so much more sophisticated that for the next several centuries the main work of European scholars, in almost every field, was to assimilate what they knew. During this period the study of ancient texts acquired great prestige. It seemed the essence of what scholars did. As European scholarship gained momentum it became less and less important; by 1350 someone who wanted to learn about science could find better teachers than Aristotle in his own era. But schools change slower than scholarship. In the 19th century the study of ancient texts was still the backbone of the curriculum. What tipped the scales, at least in the US, seems to have been the idea that professors should do research as well as teach. This idea was imported from Germany in the late 19th century. Beginning at Johns Hopkins in 1876, the new model spread rapidly. Writing was one of the casualties. Colleges had long taught English composition, But how do you do research on composition? The professors who taught math could be required to do original math, the professors who taught history could be required to write scholarly articles about history, but what about the professors who taught rhetoric or composition? What should they do research on? The closest thing seemed to be English literature.
And so in the late 19th century the teaching of writing was inherited by English professors. This had two drawbacks: (a) an expert on literature need not himself be a good writer, any more than an art historian has to be a good painter, and (b) the subject of writing now tends to be literature, since that’s what the professor is interested in.
It’ s no wonder if this seems to the student a pointless exercise, because we’ re now three steps removed from real work: the students are imitating English professors, who are imitating classical scholars, who are merely the inheritors of a tradition growing out of what was, 700 years ago, fascinating and urgently needed work.
The other big difference between a real essay and the things they make you write in school is that a real essay doesn’t take a position and then defend it. That principle, like the idea that we ought to be writing about literature, turns out to be another intellectual hangover of long forgotten origins.
It’s often mistakenly believed that medieval universities were mostly seminaries. In fact they were more law schools. And at least in our tradition lawyers are advocates, trained to take either side of an argument and make as good a case for it as they can. Whether cause or effect, this spirit pervaded early universities. The study of rhetoric, the art of arguing persuasively, was a third of the undergraduate curriculum. And after the lecture the most common form of discussion was the disputation. This is at least nominally preserved in our present-day thesis defense: most people treat the words thesis and dissertation as interchangeable, but originally, at least, a thesis was a position one took and the dissertation was the argument by which one defended it. Defending a position may be a necessary evil in a legal dispute, but it’s not the best way to get at the truth, as I think lawyers would be the first to admit. It’ s not just that you miss subtleties this way. The real problem is that you can’ t change the question.
And yet this principle is built into the very structure of the things they teach you to write in high school. The topic sentence is your thesis, chosen in advance, the supporting paragraphs the blows you strike in the conflict, and the conclusion -- uh, what is the conclusion? I was never sure about that in high school. It seemed as if we were just supposed to restate what we said in the first paragraph, but in different enough words that no one could tell. Why bother? But when you understand the origins of this sort of "essay," you can see where the conclusion comes from. It’s the concluding remarks to the jury.
Good writing should be convincing, certainly, but it should be convincing because you got the right answers, not because you did a good job of arguing. When I give a draft of an essay to friends, there are two things I want to know: which parts bore them, and which seem unconvincing. The boring bits can usually be fixed by cutting. But I don’ t try to fix the unconvincing bits by arguing more cleverly.
The sort of writing that attempts to persuade may be a valid (or at least inevitable) form, but it’ s historically inaccurate to call it an essay. An essay is something you write to try to figure something out. Figure out what? You don’ t know yet. And so you can’ t begin with a thesis, because you don’ t have one, and may never have one. An essay doesn’t begin with a statement, but with a question. In a real essay, you don’ t take a position and defend it. You notice a door that’ s ajar, and you open it and walk in to see what’ s inside. In the things you write in school you are, in theory, merely explaining yourself to the reader. In a real essay you’ re writing for yourself. You’ re thinking out loud.
Questions aren’t enough. An essay has to come up with answers. They don’ t always, of course. Some- times you start with a promising question and get nowhere. But those you don’ t publish. Those are like experiments that get inconclusive results. An essay you publish ought to tell the reader something he didn’t already know.
But what you tell him doesn’t matter, so long as it’ s interesting. I’ m sometimes accused of meandering. In defend-a-position writing that would be a flaw. There you’ re not concerned with truth. You already know where you’ re going, and you want to go straight there, blustering through obstacles, and hand-waving your way across swampy ground ( 沼泽地 ). But that’s not what you’ re trying to do in an essay. An essay is supposed to be a search for truth. It would be suspicious if it didn’t meander.
Like a river that must flow down at each step, for the essayist this translates to: flow interesting. Of all the places to go next, choose the most interesting. Of course, this doesn’t always work. Sometimes, like a river, one runs up against a wail. Then I do the same thing the river does: backtrack. At one point in this essay I found that after following a certain thread I ran out of ideas. I had to go back seven paragraphs and start over in another direction.
Fundamentally an essay is a train of thought -- but a Cleaned-up train of thought, as dialogue is cleaned- up conversation. Real thought, like real conversation, is full of false starts, It would be exhausting to read. You need to cut and fill to emphasize the central thread, like an illustrator inking over a pencil drawing. But don’ t change so much that you lose the spontaneity of the original.
Err on the side of the river. An essay is not a reference work. It’s not something you read looking for a specific answer, and feel cheated if you don’ t find it. I’d much rather read an essay that went off in an unexpected but interesting direction than one that plodded dutifully along a prescribed course.
The idea that professors should do research as well as teach was imported from Germany in the late 19th century.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
A
解析
本题根据第四段第一、二句而设,“...seems to have been the idea that professors should do research as well as teach. This idea was imported from Germany in the late 19th century.”题干将前两句合二为一。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/C1rFFFFM
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
TheAlliedadvantageintheairgraduallyincreasedthereafterandbecame______whentheUnitedStatesenteredthewarin1917.
Olderpeoplecanquicklybecomedispiritedanddepressedby______illness.
Thedirectionswereso______thatitwasimpossibletocompletetheassignment.
Whenchildrencallaboy"foureyes",becausehewearsglasses,theyarespeakingin______.
Medicalresearches______muchoftheriseintheincidenceoflungcancertothewidespreaduseofcigarettes.
Theexhibitionisdesignedto________furthercooperationbetweenthetwocountries.
A、MIT.B、ReedCollege.C、Harvard.D、Yale.A①选项都是学校名,应该一一记录听到的相关信息:A旁边记下first(或者数字1),D2,c4,然后仔细听问题。②排名第一和最后的往往是答案。
Aglobe-spanningU.N.digitallibraryseekingtodisplayandexplainthewealthofallhumancultureshasgoneintooperationo
A、BehostiletoNancy.B、AskNancytocomeout.C、TalktoNancyherself.D、WriteNancyaletter.C对话中男士提到comingrightoutandas
A、Agunattackhappenedtoherhusbandandson.B、Hersonwasparalyzedinacaraccident.C、Americawasplaguedbygun-related
随机试题
A.好发于颅骨和下颌骨B.好发于手和足的管状骨C.好发于骶尾椎和颅底蝶枕部D.好发于股骨下端、胫骨或腓骨上端和肱骨上端E.好发于下肢长骨骨干骨瘤
胆汁的主要成分不包括()。
手少阴心经的郄穴是()手少阴心经的络穴是()
2011年12月.某市财政局派出检查组对曙光公司2011年度的会计工作进行检查。检查中了解到以下情况:1.会计王某2011年6月取得会计从业资格证书并从事会计工作至今,未办理注册登记。2.该公司2011年7月以来的现金日记账和银行存款日记账没有完全按照
甲为A合伙企业的合伙人,因故欠刘某人民币10万元,无力用个人财产清偿。刘某在不满足于用甲从合伙企业分得的收益偿还其债务的情况下,可以()。
某企业“应付账款”科目月末贷方余额40000元,其中:“应付甲公司账款”明细科目贷方余额25000元,“应付乙公司账款”明细科目贷方余额25000元,“应付丙公司账款”明细科目借方余额10000元;“预付账款”科目月末贷方余额20000元,其中:“预付A工
设函数f(x)=F(x)=∫0xf(t)dt,则()
在Forml的窗体上画一个列表框,名称为L1,通过属性窗口向列表框中添加四个项目,分别为”AAAA”、”BBBB”、”CCCC”和”DDDD”,编写适当的事件过程。程序运行后,如果单击列表框中的某一项,则该项就从列表框中消失。程序的运行情况如图2-202所
A、Midnineteenthcentury.B、Latenineteenthcentury.C、Mideighteenthcentury.D、Lateeighteenthcentury.A短文谈到,美国有很多中国餐馆,超市里也卖中
Itiscustomaryforadultstoforgethowhardanddullandlongschoolis.Thelearningby【C1】______ofallthebasicthingsmu
最新回复
(
0
)