首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-04-23
28
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
Which of the following best indicates the main idea of the passage?
选项
A、Immigration is an economic policy as well as a politic policy.
B、Immigration will raise wages for the average native-born worker.
C、Immigration helps the economy and most American workers.
D、Immigration policy should be primarily oriented around the national goals.
答案
C
解析
该题为归纳总结题。该文章主要探讨扩大合法移民数量政策的益处,即有助于本国经济的增长和提高普通本国工人的工资。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ByjYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、hedidn’twanttoapprovetheresignationofEducationMinister.B、theresignedofficialswantedtheopportunitytoprovethei
Britain’seastmidlandswereoncethepictureofEnglishcountryside,alivewithflocks,shepherds,skylarksandbuttercupsthe
Istheliterarycriticlikethepoet,respondingcreatively,intuitively,subjectivelytothewrittenwordasthepoetresponds
Ablindbabyisdoublyhandicapped.Notonlyisitunabletosee,butbecauseitcannotreceivethevisualstimulusfromitsenv
然而,或是因为中国人与其他人太不一样,或是因为他们工作起来很有耐心,他们能成功地把表面看来毫无价值的开采地(miningclaim)变为有利可图的东西,这使他们成为爱嫉妒的竞争者们的眼中钉。他们受到了多种形式的骚扰。经常阻止他们在开采地上开矿;一些地区甚
A、hedidn’twanttoapprovetheresignationofEducationMinister.B、theresignedofficialswantedtheopportunitytoprovethei
社区教育是外来名词,由联合国教科文组织对社区教育的界定引入到对我国社区教育的定义。随着我国经济的发展,城市化进程的加快,大批城乡居民搬迁新居,从而产生了一个个居民小区,社区由此形成。而社区教育适应了社区居民精神生活和终身学习的需要,满足了居民的受教育的权利
A、HewantedtheU.S.tostayaloofintheinternationalcommunity.B、Hewasnearingtheendofhistenure.C、HehasbeentheU.
WhenLewisZiskawantedtoseehowawarmerwoodwithmorecarbondioxideintheairwouldaffectcertainplants,hedidn’tset
随机试题
某珠宝店失窃,五个职员涉嫌被拘审。假设这五个职员中,参与作案的人说的都是假话,无辜者说的都是真话。这五个职员分别有以下供述:张说:“王是作案者。王说过是他作的案。”王说:“李是作案者。”李说:“是赵作的案。”赵说:“是孙作的案。”孙没说一句话。
企业在发展战略中选择和实施主导型技术,对企业竞争力、发展前途都会起决定性的作用,这说明企业技术创新战略具有()
A、化湿、解暑B、化湿、明目C、化湿、消积D、化湿、平喘E、化湿、行气藿香的功效是
下列关于建筑市场诚信行为的公布的说法,错误的是()。
消防远程监控系统的用户信息传输装置在墙上安装时,其底边距地(楼)面高度宜为()m。
对于同样的经济业务进行账务处理,如果采用的记账程序不同,所采用的会计凭证、会计账簿和会计报表的种类和格式也会不同。
如信用证规定“shipmentonorabout15thOct.2013”,那么装运期应为()。
无处分权的人处分他人财产,经权利人追认或者无处分权的人订立合同后取得处分权的该合同有效。()
根据消费税法律制度的规定,下列各项中,应在生产、进口、委托加工环节缴纳消费税的有()。
在识别和评估与会计估计相关的重大错报风险时,下列各项中,注册会计师认为应当了解的有()。
最新回复
(
0
)