首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2017-01-15
34
问题
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeep and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants; "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism. " If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U. S. , warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example; "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, And May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings("Smckers die earlier")or esteem-related warnings("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid(病态的)warning on a cigarette label may actually backfire.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou(自以为是的)customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
According to Christian Jarrett, which of the following signs can make a student motivated by self-esteem stop smoking?
选项
A、Cherish Your Health, Stop Smoking
B、Smoking Makes Your Heart Stop Earlier
C、Enjoy a Cigarette, Regret a Whole Life
D、You Look More Charming Without a Cigarette
答案
D
解析
推理题。第五段第六句说明了Christian Jarrett的研究结果:从抽烟中获得自尊心的那些学生,当他们看到与死亡相关的警告和那些与自尊心相关的警告的时候,前者会令他们更加积极地看待吸烟。据此可以推出,[D]“不吸烟,你看上去更有吸引力”是属于与自尊心相关的警示牌,故为正确答案。[A]“珍惜你的健康,停止吸烟”、[B]“吸烟使你更早地死亡”和[C]“享受一支烟,后悔一辈子”均是与死亡有关的警示牌,所以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/AhnMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Curioustouristsandreportersfromaroundtheglobeare______uponthepeacefulvillages.
Fatcannotchangeintomuscle______musclechangesintofat.
Thelittlegirl’sattentionwassuddenlycaughtbyaragdollwhich______putonthesofa,andshestoppedcrying.
Thecampaigntostoppeoplefromsmokingisinfullswing.Theunderlinedpartmeans
Thelocalslikesellingthingstotouristsbecausethetouristsareso______.
Accordingtothepassage,asurveyaboutbutterfliesiscarriedonby______.
Accordingtothepassage,asurveyaboutbutterfliesiscarriedonby______.
Accordingtothepassage,somejobapplicantswererejected______.
Thebillbanssmokingin______.
随机试题
枕骨大孔疝与小脑幕裂孔疝主要临床表现差别在于
陈某系某市交通警察大队事故中队副队长,其在处理交通事故期间,利用职务便利,采用冒名领取、虚列支出事故押金等手段,侵吞事故押金款25.6万元。另外,还伪造事故调解书,以车辆保险人的名义骗取保险公司理赔金3.2万余元。陈某在处理交通事故时,多次强行要求司机到陈
[2008年,第71题]设图5.7-1(a)、(b)所示两根圆截面梁的直径分别为d和2d,许可荷载分别为[F]1和[F]2。若二梁的材料相同,则[F]2/[F]1等于()。
某施工合同履行过程中,因施工需要临时中断道路交通,发包人委托承包人办理申请批准手续。因工程所处路段交通流量大,全天中断交通的要求未获批准,承包人只能在夜间继续施工,则由此造成的承包人损失由( )。
施工方案优化主要通过对施工方案的()对比,选择最优的施工方案,达到加快施工进度并能保证施工质量和施工安全,降低消耗的目的。
请认真阅读下列材料,并按要求作答。日月潭日月潭是我国台湾省最大的一个湖。它在台中附近的高山上。那里群山环绕,树木茂盛,周围有许多名胜古迹。日月潭很深
从众型思维枷锁:指在认知判断、解决问题时,附和多数,人云亦云,缺乏独立思考,无主见,无创新意识的一种不良思维定势。以下表现不属于“从众型思维枷锁”的一项是()。
穆罕默德.阿里改革
Whatdoweknowaboutthespeakers?
A、arenomorethanasimpletoolB、aregenerallybetterthane-booksC、bringaboutadiminishedworldD、bringaboutirreplaceabl
最新回复
(
0
)