首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
admin
2018-06-06
53
问题
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant groups think it offers little hope to low-skilled, mostly Hispanic would-be migrants. Right-wingers snarl that it is nothing but an "amnesty" for illegals. Companies, who it had been hoped would support the new compromise, hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers. And the left is complaining because it fears it will depress low-end wages. It would be nice to be able to report that opposition across so full a spectrum is a sign that the bill is a well-crafted compromise. In fact, it may well turn out to be doomed.
That would be a pity, because there are some good things in the proposal. Most important, it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of what to do about the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already in America, most of them working hard at low-paid and disagreeable jobs. Deporting a population the size of Ohio’s is impossible, economically illiterate and morally wrong. The new bill would make the 12 million legal, and offer them a path, though a winding one, to full citizenship.
The right doesn’t like this, of course, and points out that amnesties(which this really isn’t, given the fines and hurdles involved)have in the past drawn fresh waves of migrants. So the other side of the bargain gives conservatives everything they could wish for in terms of razor-wired fences, surveillance drones, armed border guards and a programme that will force companies to check the legality of their workers. Such measures are probably necessary to win support and rebuild trust in the immigration system. No bill would pass without them.
The bad part of the deal is what happens to would-be immigrants once all those sensors and spy-planes are in place. The bill proposes a dual system. A guest-worker programme would allow 400,000 people a year to enter the country to work for two years, after which they must go home for a year, with a six-year cap on the total time they can spend in America. The other part is a new method of granting residence permits, carrying the right to work. Such "green cards" currently go mostly to relatives of American citizens or to people sponsored by an employer. The bill would bring in a "points" system for 380,000 people a year, similar to those in use in Canada and Australia. Permits for family members would be restricted, to cover only spouses and young children. Employers would have less ability to sponsor the people they need.
There are several problems. One is that extended families help build vibrant communities in a way that guest workers don’t. Second, the government should not be in the business of telling companies whom they ought to hire. There are ways round this, such as awarding points not for specific jobs, but still the problem is that most of the green cards will be used up by Indian software designers, Bosnian engineers or the similarly blessed. America does indeed need such folk, but it also needs legions of the less-skilled, too.
That will continue to mean a large, poorly paid and constantly rotating alien underclass with little stake in American society. On May 23rd, the Senate voted to scale the guest worker programme back to 200,000. So the illegals will keep coming—except that now their journey will be still more dangerous and they will be even further beyond the law. The current bill is better than nothing: but unless it is improved, it will not solve the main problem of the illegals.
What does the word "amnesty"(Para. 1)mean?
选项
A、Favorable policy.
B、Solution.
C、Obstacle.
D、Key initiative.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/6TCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Orperhapshelooksatarun-downmountainhouseand,rememberingRousseauratherthanseeingwithhiseyes,decidesthat"those
Withsomuchmomentumpushingforacure,theemphasisfromresearchersandfrontlineoncologistsisonmorevigilanceaboutthe
Ifthereisanyendeavorwhosefruitsshouldbefreelyavailable,thatendeavorissurelypubliclyfinancedscience.Morally,ta
Mozart’splaceinhistoryisdueinparttothefactthathisfatherrecognizedandnurturedhistalentfromanearlyage,virtu
Leonardmayhaveactedaudaciouslyindetermininghisbook’sformatandpresentation,buthisresponsetoProfessorDudek’sinvi
"Oh,forgoodness’sake,Laura!"heretortedangrily."I’mjusttoodamntiredtoputupwithanynonsense-especiallysomethin
Mosttrivialargumentsaresaidtobebasedonmattersofprinciple.Whyshouldprinciplesmattersomuch?Whycannotwebemore
Followingayearoffastdevelopment,bythefirstquarterofthisyear,Chinahashadabout1,100e-commercewebsites.
A、ThesugarindustryvariesinprosperityamongproducingcountriesinLatinAmericaB、Worldsugarproducersallsufferfromsho
我很高兴应邀与各位交流一下不同文化所形成的交际模式。作为一名在中国教学的美国人,我的报告基于我个人的经历和体会。来自不同文化背景的人们往往都认为自己的行为方式是“正常的”。但涉及到说话方式时,有些在本族人看来很自然的话语却被外族人视为荒诞,甚至会
随机试题
心房和心室收缩在时间上不重叠,后者必定落在前者完毕后的原因是
胃大部切除后,呕吐物不含胆汁的并发症是
外科临床上,代谢性碱中毒最常见的病因是
首先考虑的诊断为( )现阶段最适宜的治疗方法( )
能代表病毒体的是病毒的
关于误差和精确度的正确说法有()。
一、注意事项1.考试,与传统作文考试不同,是对分析驾驭材料的能力与对表达能力并重的考试。2.作答参考时限:阅读资料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”依次作答。二、资料1.2003年
美国的知识分子——2006年英译汉及详解IsittruethattheAmericanintellectualisrejectedandconsideredofnoaccountinhissociety?Iamgo
Thevalueofhousesinmanybigcities___________(翻了一番还多)since1.
Themethodformakingbeerhaschangedovertime.Hops(啤酒花),forexample,whichgivemanyamodembeeritsbitterflavor,are
最新回复
(
0
)