首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally i
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally i
admin
2011-01-10
57
问题
Doctors alone must make the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, including artificial feeding, and allow a terminally ill patient to die, according to British Medical Association guidelines published yesterday.
They must consult the family, take into account views of the patient and get a second medical opinion. But ultimately the responsibility rests with the doctor, and if the family disagrees it can only challenge his or her decision in the courts.
Members of the BMA’s ethics committee, which produced the guidelines, said they were not a charter for euthanasia.
"This is not about intending to kill people. It is about intending to withdraw what people believe to be useless or non-beneficial interventions," said Raanan Gillon, a GP and professor of medical ethics at Imperial College, London. "It is the difference between foreseeing death as the outcome and intending it."
Opponents of euthanasia rejected this distinction. "I am deeply concerned that some doctors might interpret the guidelines to increase the number of unnatural deaths," said Dr Andrew Fergusson, chairman of the pressure group Healthcare Opposed to Euthanasia.
"I recognize these are very difficult matters, but I am anxious about even more power being given to doctors in the apparent absence of adequate safeguards. This guidance will be bad for some patients."
The BMA has produced the guidelines because of confusion and uncertainly among doctors over how to proceed when treatment is doing more harm than good—perhaps in the case of unsuccessful chemotherapy for cancer—or when a patient is incapacitated after a severe stroke or advanced dementia.
The House of Lords judgment in the 1993 Bland case has muddied the waters. Tony Bland was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS) after the Hillsborough disaster. The courts backed the BMA view that the artificial feeding and hydration through a tube that were keeping him alive were medical treatments.
His father won permission to have all treatments stopped and his son was allowed to die. But the Lords stated that their ruling applied only to patients in PVS and suggested each case should be referred in turn to the courts.
The BMA guidelines make clear that they feel there is no such need in cases other than PVS. These are hard decisions, but doctors are well qualified to make them. If the decision involves stopping artificial nutrition and hydration, which the document accepts is an emotive issue, then a second opinion from a specialist unconnected with the case must be sought.
The doctor must try to ascertain the patient’s own wishes. The views of children under 16 who are capable of understanding must be respected and their parents’ views sought. Living wills requesting no further treatment must be complied with.
With patients who cannot communicate, doctors must consider among other things whether the invasiveness and pain of treatment are justifiable, how likely is any improvement and how aware patients are of the world around them.
The document accuses society of "unrealistic expectations.., about the extent to which it is possible to postpone death."
But SOS-NHS Patients in Danger, a pressure group formed by relatives of patients who have died in hospital, rejected the guidelines outright.
It said: "A terminally iii patient, with weeks, months and (who knows) even years to live would not benefit from having their death hastened for the convenience of medical staff and managers when they and their family might have other plans for how they wish to spend their precious remaining time together."
Before making the final decision whether to withdraw treatment, the doctor, according to the guidelines,______.
选项
A、should refer the case to a court for approval
B、should persuade the relatives of the patient to agree to withdrawing treatment
C、should do his best to find out what the patient wants
D、should first consider whether doing so is justifiable from the point of ethics
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/2gQYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Ofalltheareasoflearningthemostimportantisthedevelopmentofattitudes.Emotionalreactionsaswellaslogicalthought
Asthemanagerwasawayonabusinesstrip,Iwasaskedto______theweeklystaffmeeting.
Thedoctorswereworriedbecausethepatientdidnotrecuperateasrapidlyastheyhadexpected.
Thepossibilitiesfor______energysources,includingsolarpower,windpower,geothermalpower,waterpowerandevennuclearene
Althoughsalmonmaytravelhundredsofmilesfromwheretheywerespawned,theywillultimatelyreturntheretolayeggs.
Undoubtedlyinninety-ninecasesoutofahundredawitnesstoanoccurrenceissomeonewhohasseenit.Therefore,someeditors
核安全核能自诞生之日起,对人类的经济社会产生了积极作用。但人们也看到,核能应用存在巨大风险。福岛核泄漏事故后,一些国家开始限制和放弃核能的开发和使用。而中国的立场是,在接下来相当长的时期内,核能仍是我们确保能源安全,保障经济社会发展,应
A、TheOriginsofGPSB、TheAdvantagesofGPSC、TheFutureofGPSD、TheIncreasingUsesofGPS:MilitaryandCivilianD本题要求把握全文结构
随机试题
论实用艺术作品受著作权法保护的条件。
Therewasatimeinthelate17thcenturywhennorespectablemonarchwouldbeseenwithoutaguitar.BothLouisXIVandCharles
桡神经损伤可致【】
甲(男,22周岁)为达到与乙(女,19周岁)结婚的目的,故意隐瞒乙的真实年龄办理了结婚登记。两年后,因双方经常吵架,乙以办理结婚登记时未达到法定婚龄为由向法院起诉,请求宣告婚姻无效。人民法院应如何处理?
基础工程中持力层为砾石层或卵石层,厚度符合设计要求时,可不进行轻型静力触探。()
建筑安装企业支付给病假在6个月以上的生产工人的工资应计入()。
在美国,自2008年以来,大学毕业生的失业率从未超过5%,而高中辍学者的失业率在2009年和2010年的高峰期却增至15%以上。在所有经合组织国家中,这一趋势已经很明显:新增的工作越来越需要拥有高学历和高技能的工人。因此,世界上很多工人正在被抛弃。以下各项
“读万卷书”,曾经被认为是非常风雅的事情。时光流转,到如今,深度投入的阅读________,取而代之的是________、________的快餐式阅读。而随着微博等新兴社交网络媒体的进一步普及,快餐式阅读越加普遍。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是:
Theymayhavecreatedappealingvisualswiththeirfavouritecoloursonpaper,moreoverwhentheywereaskedbythefamoushotel
CultureShockI.Thephasesofcultureshock1)【T1】phase【T1】________a.culturaldifferences:romantic,wonderfulandnewb.
最新回复
(
0
)