首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent f
admin
2012-01-14
50
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
Which of the following can be inferred from Paragraph 4 about the power of the curse of the Pharaoh’s tomb?
选项
A、It is supported by science.
B、It is a rumor denied by scientific fact.
C、It is still a myth.
D、It does punish people who disturb the tomb.
答案
B
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:关于第四段所提到的诅咒的力量,可以作出以下哪一项推论?根据本段,Carter团队中的一些人的意外死亡似乎应验了这一诅咒,但是Carter却在多年以后平静地去世。所以,这证明了谣言并不正确,已经被事实所否定,因此选B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ymlYFFFM
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
CompletethesentencesbelowwithNOMORETHANONEWORDfromthepassage.Writeyouranswersinboxes7-9onyouranswersheet.
DothefollowingstatementsagreewiththeinformationgiveninReadingPassage1?Inboxes11-13onyouranswersheet,writeTR
AccordingtoMrSingh,onwhichthingdomanypeoplemakesuperficialobservations?AccordingtoMrSingh,thebiggestproblem
AccordingtoMrSingh,onwhichthingdomanypeoplemakesuperficialobservations?HowmanychildrendoesMrSinghhave?
Theprofessorsaysthatsuperhighways______.【30】
Choosethecorrectletter,A,BorC.Therestaurantisfamousfor
ChooseTHREEletters,A-F.WhichTHREEthingsarethestudentsrequiredtosubmittotheirprofessor?AawrittensummaryBnote
Whatdoesthepassagemainlydiscuss?Itcanbeinferredfromparagraph3thatPasteuremployedaswam-neckedflaskto
NarratorListentoapartofalectureinanecologyclass.WhatistheHydrologiccycle?
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?TherearemanylegendsabouttheworldfamousEgyptianPharaohs’tombs,whichhavelainsilentf
随机试题
以下属于以节约成本为基础的收益分享计划的是()。
蔡某,男,75岁,已婚,汉族。两年前妻子去世,独自居住,近1年来患者出现对任何事情不感兴趣,做事丢三落四,记不住家属的名字,情绪变得易激惹,性格变得自私、挑剔,近期出现重复购买相同的物品,记忆力差,说话没有逻辑,由家人送入医院。首选的治疗药物是
关于肾上腺皮质腺瘤声像图特征叙述,不正确的是
高比密尿可见于以下疾病或情况,不包括
患者,男,43岁,耳鸣耳聋日久,耳中如蝉鸣,按之鸣声减弱,时作时止,劳累后加剧,兼有腰膝酸软,乏力,遗精,脉虚细。治疗除主方外,宜配( )。
下列费用中,不属于建筑安装工程直接工程费的有()。
甲公司购进一台价值120万元的机器设备,向保险公司投保。保险合同约定保险金额为60万元,但未约定保险金的计算方法。后保险期间发生了保险事故,造成该设备实际损失80万元;甲公司为防止损失的扩大,花费了6万元施救费。根据保险法律制度的规定,保险公司应当支付给甲
质量方针是由组织的最高管理者正式发布的该组织总的质量宗旨和质量方向,其基本要求应包括()。
提出科学发展观主要体现了党对国家的()。
Thegovernmentistobanpaymentstowitnessesbynewspapersseekingtobuyuppeopleinvolvedinprominentcases【C1】______thet
最新回复
(
0
)