首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a gla
admin
2018-04-04
54
问题
It seems like every day there’s some new research about whether our favorite drinks are good for us. One day, science says a glass of red wine a day will help us live longer. The next day, maybe not. It seems journalists are pretty interested in wine research and the same might be said for coffee. Now, there’s been a lot of research into whether coffee is good for our health. "The results have really been mixed," admits Neal Freedman who led the coffee study and published his findings in a medical journal recently. "There’s been some evidence that coffee might increase the risk of certain diseases and there’s also been maybe more recent evidence that coffee may protect against other diseases as well."
Freedman and his colleagues undertook the biggest study yet to look at the relationship between coffee and health. They analyzed data collected from more than 400,000 Americans ages 50 to 71 participating in the study. "We found that the coffee drinkers had a modestly lower risk of death than those no-drinkers," he said. Here’s what he means by "modestly" : those who drank at least two or three cups a day were about 10 percent or 15 percent less likely to die for any reason during the 13 years of the study. When the researchers looked at specific causes of death, coffee drinking appeared to cut the risk of dying from heart disease, lung disease, injuries, accidents and infections.
Now, Freedman stressed that the study doesn’t prove coffee can make people live longer. A study like this can never prove a cause-and-effect relationship. All it can really do is to point researchers in the right direction for further investigation. And even if it turns out that coffee is really good for you, scientists have no idea why.
According to the passage, which of the following is TRUE?
选项
A、Freedman and his colleagues hired 400,000 Americans to collect data.
B、About four hundred thousand Americans worked for Freedman’s team full time for 13 years.
C、People who took part in Freedman’s research are about 50 to 70 years old.
D、People who are 50 to 70 years old seldom drink coffee.
答案
C
解析
根据文章第二段第二句“They analyzed data collected from more than 400,000 Americans ages 50 to 71 participating in the study.”可知选项C正确,故选C。弗里德曼做研究的时候并不是雇用了这些人,所以选项A和B说法都不对。在这些参与者中,明明是有的喝咖啡,有的不喝咖啡,选项D属于无中生有。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/xjGYFFFM
0
成人本科学位英语
相关试题推荐
Notoncesincemysonwenttohighschool______travelingwithhim.
Thefoodyouboughtyesterday______.
Heaskedfor______classesathomebecausehethoughthewouldlearnFrenchmorequickly.
Itisdifficulttoimaginewhatlifewouldbelikewithoutmemory.(78)Themeaningsofthousandsofeverydayperceptions,theb
ThereasonwhyIcamelateis______Imissedthebus.
Accordingtothepassage,whichofthefollowingisthebestwayforchildrentolearnthings?Accordingtothewriter,teacher
Itwasnotaneasydecisionforhertomakeasitwouldaffectherfuturestudyincollegeandherfuturejob______.
Ididn’tdrink______thisafternoon.Iamnotfeelingquitemyselfnow.
Heisvery________inusingmoney.
随机试题
关于不协调性宫缩乏力,下列说法正确的是
COPD随着病情的发展,最终会导致
主含生物碱的中药材有
利血平+氢氯噻嗪银杏+对乙酰氨基酚
风险偏好和风险战略应由()审批。
教育部制订的《义务教育化学课程标准(2011年版)》指出:课程实施评价的重点是学业评价,其功能主要是促进学生的有效学习,改善教师的教学,进一步完善课程实施方案。义务教育阶段的化学学业评价,包括形成性评价和终结性评价,都应严格根据本标准来确定评价的目标、测
小霞能根据他人的具体情况,以平等为标准,在同情、关心的基础上对同学的学习和生活中的道德事件进行判断。根据皮亚杰的理论,小霞的道德发展处于()。
人民警察在紧急情况下可以无偿使用公民的交通工具、通讯工具等。()
①趣味是一个比喻,由口舌感觉引申出来的②文学的修养可以说就是趣味的修养③趣味对于文学的重要于此可知④辨别一种作品的趣味就是评判,玩索一种作品的趣味就是欣赏,把自己在人生、自然或艺术中所领略到的趣味表现出就是创造⑤它是一件极寻常的事,却也是一件极难的
Itseemsyoualwaysforge--yourreadingglasseswhenyouarerushingtowork,yourcoatwhenyouaregoingtothecleaners,your
最新回复
(
0
)