首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
44
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/xdQYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Theprisoner______thathehadassaultedapoliceman.
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Ifbeingcarriedoutsuccessfully,theplanwillcompletelychangethetrafficconditionsinthecity.
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Thegraduatecommitteemustbeinfullaccordintheirapprovalofadissertation.
Japanandthenewlyindustrializedcountriesarepassinglabor-intensivesectsasgarment-makingovertolessdevelopednations
Thegraduatecommitteemustbeinfullaccordintheirapprovalofadissertation.
Themagistrateisnowchargedwithseveralcrimes,includingfraud,acceptingbribesandtaxevasion.
随机试题
钨极主要起传导()、引燃电弧和维持电弧正常燃烧的作用。
A.神经元细胞B.肠上皮细胞C.T淋巴细胞D.甲状腺腺泡细胞属于稳定细胞的是
患者郭某,女性,72岁,确诊为老年痴呆4年,社区护士与其家属进行有关家庭护理的指导,下列不妥的一项是
按照我国生活饮用水现行标准(GB/T5750.12一2006)的规定,可用于测定生活饮用水中的总大肠菌群的方法是
控制化学位移伪影的措施不包括
含氟矿物质中最重要的包括
下列关于我国现行工程变更价款的确定,说明正确的有( )。
下列各种筹资方式中,最有利于降低公司财务风险的是()。
某电脑公司为了赢得顾客的信赖,扩大市场份额,采取了一系列措施,例如加强产品质量宣传,进行市场调查,收集顾客反馈信息,增加售后服务网点,通过质量管理体系认证。为了向顾客提供信任,并增强顾客满意,该公司按GB/T19001—2000(ISO9001:200
Forthemostpart,schoolsaredesignedtoproducepeoplewhofitintosociety,notpeoplewhosetouttochangeit.However,sc
最新回复
(
0
)