首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
1 A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that
1 A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that
admin
2012-11-22
45
问题
1 A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失) cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
2 Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate ofthe times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
3 Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident." In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
4 In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
5 As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads --against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
此题为一般推理题。综观全文,我们知道作者在此文中主要讨论了人们就审理涉及铁路公司的案子时所持的态度及其变化。A、B、C均与原文主旨有很大出入。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/wIOMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Americansbelievetimeisalimitedresource;theytrytoconserveandmanageit.PeopleintheU.S.often【C1】______seminarsor
Whetherworkshouldbeplacedamongthecausesofhappinessoramongthecausesofunhappinessmayperhapsberegardedasadoub
Thecompetitionamongproducersofpersonalcomputersisessentiallyaracetogetthebest,mostinnovativeproductstothemar
TheCarnegieFoundationreportsaysthatmanycollegeshavetriedtobe"allthingstoallpeople."Indoingso,theyhaveincre
Howmanypeoplewerekilledinthemassacre?
WhatisTina’sattitudetowardstheadvertisement?
Ifsustainablecompetitiveadvantagedependsonworkforce,skills,Americanfirmshaveaproblem.Human-resourcemanagementis
Itwasn’tallhardworkattheG8summitoftheworld’smostpowerfulleaders.Therewasgoodfood,lotsofglad-handing.Ifthe
Itwasn’tallhardworkattheG8summitoftheworld’smostpowerfulleaders.Therewasgoodfood,lotsofglad-handing.Ifthe
Oneoftheadvantagesofmostpaidworkisthatitgiveschancesofsuccessandopportunitiesforambition.Inmostworksuccess
随机试题
小建中汤与桂枝汤共有的药物是
测得某溶液的pH为8,则溶液中[H+]应表示为
患者,女,23岁。2个月前因外伤致一上前牙脱落,今要求烤瓷修复。口腔检查:缺失,间隙正常,牙槽嵴无明显吸收。牙冠1/2缺损,已露髓,探诊稍敏感,叩诊(-),无松动。左上尖牙牙冠良好,叩诊(-),无松动。余牙未见异常。最佳治疗方案是
正常小儿后囟闭合的时间一般于出生后
关于板式橡胶支座抗剪弹性模量的试验检测,请回答下列问题。若某支座3次加载测得的综合抗剪弹性模量分别为1.03MPa、1.04MPa、1.08MPa,则该板式橡胶支座的综合抗剪弹性模量应取()。
南方某加工厂新接到一批订单,需要工人加班。该企业拟延长工作时间,列选项中符合规定的是()。
彩塑是中国民间手工艺品之一,以黏土加上纤维物、河沙、水,揉合成胶泥,多在木制骨架上进行形体塑造,阴干后填缝、打磨,再着色描绘。我国的彩塑发展到盛唐达到了顶峰,这一时期的代表作品是()。
一名就读于苏州某小学的王同学,因为在上音乐课时自言自语,被音乐老师用封箱胶带施以“封嘴”半节课的惩罚。下列关于该音乐老师课堂问题处理方式的说法,不正确的是()。
Industrialism,atleastwithinourexperienceofitformorethan200years,never【B1】______apointofequilibriumoralevel
A、 B、 C、 A本句是陈述身体不舒服以至于不能来上班这一事实的陈述句。
最新回复
(
0
)