首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
69
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that______.
选项
A、it is too dull to attend lectures
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
答案
D
解析
参考文章第一句,“the quality of lecturers varies greatly”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/w5jGFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
SupposeyouworkinabigfirmandfindEnglishveryimportantforyourjobbecauseyouoftendealwithforeignbusinessmen.Now
HOWTOBOOKBookopensforBeckettShortson8September.BYTELEPHONEForcreditcard(信用卡)bookings.Callsare
—Wastheclasslongenough?—No,itwash’t______enough.
HowtoSelectaHomeComputerComputersareveryversatile.Theycandomanythingssuchasteaching,playinggames,orhelp
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
Agreenhouseisabuildingmadeofglasswhichisusedforkeepingplantswarmwhentheoutsidetemperatureishow.Inasimilar
A、magazineB、temperatureC、grandsonD、languageB
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
随机试题
阳性造影剂的特点不包括
A.经粪一口传播B.经飞沫传播C.经飞沫或接触传播D.经蚊虫传播E.经血液传播
腺垂体功能减退症常见的原因是()
必须在药品标签上印有规定标志的药品有
赵某因有盗窃行为被县公安局处以罚款100元,赵某不服,向市公安局提起行政复议。市公安局复议后决定对赵某加重处罚,决定拘留15天。下列说法正确的是:()
适用于大型机器设备或重型起重运输设备制造的厂房是()。【2007年真题】
(A)条件(1)充分,但条件(2)不充分(B)条件(2)充分,但条件(1)不充分(C)条件(1)和(2)单独都不充分,但条件(1)和(2)联合起来充分(D)条件(1)充分,条件(2)也充分(E)条件(1)和(2)单独都不充分,条件(1)和
关于台湾问题,以下哪些提法是正确的()。
Whatdoesthemanproposetodofirst?Whatarethetwospeakerstalkingabout?
【B1】【B9】
最新回复
(
0
)