首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
40
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/vV3GFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
【B1】【B18】
Somepeopleare(fedupwithmoderncitylife)andhavemovedtothecountry.
Somepuretheorists,likeEinstein,carelittleaboutthe______(apply)oftheirtheories.
Theyrequiredthatallthenecessarydocuments______tothepresident’sofficebeforetheendofthismonth.
Beforetheconferencebegan,aJapanesebusinessmanwasintroducedtoanAmericanbusinessmanatthelounge.TheJapanesebusine
Couldyouwritemealetter_____?
Theonlythingthatreallymatterstothechildrenishowsoonthey____returntotheirschool.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowaridcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorres
CliffordStollranacomputersysteminBerkeley,California.Asasystemadministrator,hekeptacloseeyeontherecords.One
随机试题
食管的第二个狭窄:
肺癌放射治疗时,食管反应多数出现在照射多少时,表现为进食时食管痛
上颌骨折诊断中最有决定意义的症状是
患者,男性,46岁。2003年9月就诊。间歇性发热2个月,发热间隔不规律,伴寒战、乏力、恶心、呕吐,近两日出现尿少,尿黄,头痛,腰痛,1日前出现意识障碍。发病前40天由泰国考察归国。体检:T40.5℃,R23次/min,P98次/min,BP125/80m
慢性淋巴细胞白血病易并发
衍生工具的()是未来买卖合约标的资产的价格。
秦某带着8岁的儿子买肉时,与摊主发生争执,继而互殴。秦某被摊主用刀背打击造成面部骨折,脑部受损。如该案进入诉讼程序,秦某的儿子属于()。
根据纯粹预期理论,当前一年期利率为3%,2年期利率为5%,1年之后的1年期利率预计为()。[中国人民大学2015金融硕士]
Acommercialbankshallformulateitsbusinessrules,establishandimproveitsbusinessmanagement,thesystemofcashcontrol
Agroupof5,000investorsrespondedtoasurveyaskingwhethertheyownedstocksandwhethertheyownedbonds.Ofthegroup,20
最新回复
(
0
)